Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax - 4 Delhi v. Mitsubishi Corporation (India) Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order deleting disallowance under Section 40(a)(i) as payments to foreign associated enterprises without permanent establishment in India are not taxable, and thus no TDS under Section 195 is required.
Ashiana Ispat Limited v. Kamdhenu Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that writ petitions challenging trademark registration procedures are maintainable under Article 226, but procedural fairness requires affected parties be given opportunity to respond before adverse orders, and remanded the matter for fresh hearing.
Kailash Katyal v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld framing of charges under Sections 308, 353, and 332 IPC against the petitioner, holding that a prima facie case existed based on identification and material on record, and that injury severity is not determinative for Section 308 IPC.
Neetu v. State (NCT of Delhi)
Anticipatory bail was denied to an OPD assistant accused of large-scale embezzlement and forgery, as custodial interrogation was necessary for investigation despite allegations of police misconduct.
Vinkal Girish Shah v. State (N.C.T. of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail applications of accused involved in a jewellery theft case, holding that prima facie evidence and prior antecedents justify denial of bail pending trial.
Ankit Raj v. State of NCT of Delhi and Others
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 376 IPC, holding that the existence of a marriage ceremony negated the allegation of rape on false promise of marriage and that the relationship was consensual.
Kishan Lal & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi)
Delhi High Court upheld convictions under Sections 308/34 and 341 IPC but granted probation to appellants considering their age and conduct, suspending their sentences subject to good behavior bonds.
Lt. Col. Atul Chaudhary v. Smita Chaudhry and Ors.
The High Court held that intervention under Order I Rule 10 CPC is not permissible after withdrawal and dismissal of an appeal, and dismissed the petitioner’s challenge to the dismissal of his application for intervention.
M/S INTERNATIONAL PRINT O PAC LTD. v. REKHA GOYAL
The High Court directed the Trial Court to reconsider the petitioner's procedural application afresh in light of insolvency proceedings produced belatedly, without expressing any opinion on the substantive dispute.
JWO Prashant Kaushik v. 677635 EX WO Raj Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption of service connection and limiting its review to errors of law apparent on record.
Union of India v. Pt Munshi Ram & Associates Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act for a 303-day delay in filing, holding that procedural delays and clerical errors do not constitute sufficient cause for condonation of delay.
Ms. Gargi Srivastava v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that candidates who submit rectified Income and Asset Certificates for the correct financial year upon UPSC's request and issued by competent authorities are entitled to EWS reservation, but certificates submitted after the cut-off date cannot be accepted.
Union of India v. Ex PO Log (F and A) Pawan Kumar Uniyal
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension to a retired serviceman, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising post-entry are attributable to service unless rebutted by the employer.
Union of India v. Hav Has Bahadur Gurung
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that such disability is service-related absent contrary proof and limiting its review to legal errors only.
M/S Gaurav Trading Co. v. Naveen Jain Sole Proprietor of M/S Metalcraft
The Delhi High Court disposed of a commercial appeal as infructuous following the respondent's withdrawal of the underlying suit.
Constable Krishna Swamy Shogokar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition directing the respondents to treat it as a representation and decide it within six weeks, leaving the petitioner free to pursue legal remedies thereafter.
Smt. Sharmila Devi v. The Registrar General, Delhi High Court
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn on the petitioner's request after partial hearing.
XXXXX v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside the Trial Court's order directing forensic examination of the accused's mobile phone, holding that the Coordinate Bench did not mandate such seizure and remanded the matter for fresh consideration on defence evidence.
Jeetendra Kumar Singh v. Director of Education & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a retrospective "deemed suspension" under Rule 115(4) of DSEAR pending fresh disciplinary inquiry after termination was set aside on technical grounds.
Akshay Thakur v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a consensual relationship case under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, emphasizing that consent between adults negates rape charges and unexplained FIR delay undermines prosecution credibility.