Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Rajni Gupta @ Rajnee v. The State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 394/34 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement between parties and the complainants' consent to discontinue prosecution.
Anuj Ghai and Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings based on an amicable settlement between the parties and withdrawal of prosecution by the complainant.
Shri Mahavir & Anr. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 452, 323, 506, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's consent to discontinue prosecution.
Kartar Singh & Anr v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the setting aside of FIR registration order, holding that judicial discretion under Section 156(3) CrPC must be exercised with proper application of mind and that police proceedings were not illegal.
Shubham Bansal v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The High Court upheld the Sessions Court's order directing further investigation under Section 173(8) Cr.P.C., dismissed the petition challenging limitation and maintainability of revision, and affirmed the power of courts to ensure proper investigation despite procedural delays.
Ashok Kumar Chaudhary & Ors. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that contractual Domestic Breeding Checkers continuously employed in sanctioned posts are entitled to pay parity with similarly placed contractual employees, ruling that denial of such pay violates Article 14.
Avtar Singh Arora v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court set aside a DPC decision downgrading an officer's APAR already acted upon for promotion, directing a fresh DPC to consider his promotion with due regard to all relevant material including his representation.
Chandra Prabha Khanna v. CBI
The Delhi High Court directed deferral of recording an accused's statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. due to medical incapacity to communicate, pending further medical clarification.
Bhagayshree Digambar Mungre & Anr. v. Small Farmers Consortium & Anr.
The court held that a director who resigned before the cheque issuance date cannot be held liable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, quashing proceedings against such director.
Arun Kumar v. Dr. Harsh Vardhan
The Delhi High Court dismissed an election petition alleging corrupt practice due to discrepancies in asset disclosure, holding that mere valuation differences without proof of undue influence do not invalidate an election.
Court on Its Own Motion v. Delhi Jal Board & Ors.
The Delhi High Court suo motu petition on groundwater depletion was disposed of after noting adequate administrative measures for rain water harvesting and directing strict enforcement of existing regulations.
Punjab National Bank & Anr v. S K Kardam
The Delhi High Court set aside a promotion order based on an unchallenged rejection of a communicated downgraded ACR, holding that courts cannot direct promotion but only ensure procedural fairness in promotion processes.
Central Bureau of Investigation v. Sanjeev Kumar & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that when witnesses are recalled to prove certification under Section 65-B, the electronic evidence such as CDs must be played and proved on record to ensure a just trial.
Anil @ Bunty v. State
Bail was denied to the accused in a sexual assault case involving a mentally challenged minor due to strong corroborative forensic evidence and victim testimony.
Nitya Nand Sinha v. M/S HL Promoters Private Limited and Anr
The Delhi High Court held that a General Manager on probation performing managerial and supervisory duties is not a workman under the Industrial Disputes Act, and his termination during probation was lawful and not retrenchment.
Sr. Divisional Manager, LIC of India v. Renuka Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld the removal from service of an employee for unauthorized absence after a fair enquiry, rejecting the Industrial Tribunal’s interference based on alleged discriminatory punishment and clarifying the limited scope of equality under Article 14.
Roshan Lal v. Ram Nath Garg
The High Court upheld the appointment of a Local Commissioner to measure disputed properties but restricted the commissioner's role to factual tasks, excluding legal opinions on amalgamation, and allowed limited additional evidence.
Sunil Verma v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Trial Court to promptly dispose of the petitioner's application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. seeking investigation into a partnership investment dispute, condemning undue judicial delay.
Nikhil Singh & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR and related proceedings following an amicable settlement and the complainant's consent to discontinue prosecution.
Asif v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR and all proceedings based on an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's decision not to prosecute.