Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
R. S. Misra v. Union of India & Anr.
Delhi High Court remanded the petitioner’s service benefits claim to CAT for fresh consideration, holding that termination with pay in lieu of notice does not forfeit past service and the petitioner is entitled to full salary and leave benefits during deemed service.
Deepika v. Union Public Service Commission
The Delhi High Court allowed correction of a bona fide error in the petitioner’s examination application form and permitted her to participate in the interview stage, exercising its extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226.
Ritesh Soni v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that procedural irregularities in a competent court's trial do not permit a de novo trial under the BSF Act, upholding the constitutional bar against double jeopardy.
Sandeep Jain v. Additional Director DRI (Directorate of Revenue Intelligence) and Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition seeking advocate presence during recording of statement under Section 108 Customs Act, holding such presence is not a right absent credible apprehension of coercion.
Sudhanshu M. Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging DERC tariff orders on pension fund charges, holding that statutory appeal under Section 111 of the Electricity Act, 2003 is the proper remedy.
Ram Kishan & Anr v. Delhi Cantonment Board & Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Delhi Cantonment Board's jurisdiction over the petitioners' land, directing the disputed factual issue to be adjudicated by the trial court in the pending civil suit.
Abhishek Dutt and Anr. v. N.C.T. of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the PIL seeking enhanced protective and medical facilities for Safai Karamcharis, holding that adequate steps have been taken and administrative mechanisms suffice for oversight.
Aravali Infra Power Limited v. Michigan Engineers Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award, holding that rejection of expert evidence by the arbitrator with reasons does not warrant interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Avadh Kaushik v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL filed immediately after a fire incident, holding that authorities must be given reasonable time to act before judicial intervention.
Sudhanshu M. Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging DERC tariff orders including pension fund contributions, holding that the petitioner must pursue statutory appeals under Section 111 of the Electricity Act, 2003.
Step Ahead Foundation v. Bureau of Indian Standards and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the lawful cancellation of a tender after the petitioner was declared lowest bidder, emphasizing limited judicial review and absence of mala fide in administrative decisions.
M/S PUSHPAK ENTERPRISES v. M/S PINE WOOD INFORMATION SYSTEM P LTD
The Delhi High Court allowed the dissolution of a company under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956, where winding up was complete or could not proceed due to lack of assets.
Rajeev & Ors. v. State of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under multiple IPC sections following an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Manju Devi & Ors. v. Mohd Sabir & Ors.
Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to correct the multiplier and enhance non-pecuniary damages in a motor accident compensation claim, directing the insurer to pay the enhanced amount with interest.
National Insurance Company v. Geeta & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the insurer's appeal granting it the right of recovery against the insured owner for breach of policy where the driver held only an LMV licence but drove a heavier vehicle.
M/S Mitsubishi Corporation India Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner Value Added Tax, Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the discretionary pre-deposit order under Section 74 of the DVAT Act, holding the 5% deposit direction lawful and reasonable.
Sakshi Mehta v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the discharge of the accused from rape charges under Section 376 IPC, holding that sexual intercourse between legally married spouses does not constitute rape under Indian law.
Kuldeep Kumar & Ors. v. The State (Govt. of NCT Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under dowry harassment and related offences following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties.
Arun Mishra & Ors. v. The State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual divorce decree, emphasizing prevention of abuse of process.
Charat Singh v. The State of Delhi
Anticipatory bail was denied to the accused in a murder case due to serious allegations, non-cooperation with investigation, and pending forensic verification of alibi evidence.