Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Food Inspector v. Pushottam Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the reduction of sentence for food adulteration under the Food Safety and Standards Act, applying the principle of beneficial construction to grant the accused the benefit of reduced punishment.
Paramjeet Singh @ Parmeet v. State, Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354 and 509 IPC after the parties amicably resolved their dispute and the complainant supported the quashing.
Dinesh Dayal v. Yogeshwar Dayal
The Delhi High Court held that a trial court cannot transfer a suit to the High Court under Section 151 CPC and that valuation objections are to be raised at the final decree stage, dismissing the petitioner’s transfer application.
Biji Rajesh v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court upheld the Competent Authority's permission for repair and renovation involving internal alterations within a prohibited area near Humayun Tomb, clarifying that such works do not amount to prohibited construction under the Ancient Monuments Act.
M.D. Overseas Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the review petition to quash the Show Cause Notice issued to M.D. Overseas Ltd., holding that notifications are effective only upon gazette publication and cannot be applied retrospectively.
Union of India v. Mridula Kapur
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order releasing the respondent's properties from attachment under PMLA, holding that acquittal under the PC Act precludes treating those properties as proceeds of crime.
Kundan Care Products Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed a review petition to quash a Show Cause Notice, holding that notifications not yet gazetted cannot apply retrospectively to gold coin imports.
Abhishek Aggarwal v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging an ordinance as infructuous after the ordinance was replaced by a new Act, granting liberty to challenge the new Act.
Aman Verma & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR arising from a matrimonial dispute on the ground of amicable settlement and reconciliation between the parties.
Bayer Crop Science Limited v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed Customs and DGFT to retransmit and process shipping bills for MEIS benefits after technical glitches hindered automatic data transmission.
VIPUL KUMAR ..... Through Mr. Pradeep Rana with Mr. Sumit Chaudhary, Mr. Kanwar Kochar, Mr. Anushasit Arya, Ms. Akansha Bansal and Mr. Abhishek Rana, Advocates v. THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI .....
The Delhi High Court set aside trial court judgments in cross FIR cases decided separately after a long gap, directing fresh trial following the Supreme Court's procedure to avoid conflicting decisions.
Dhiraj Kumar Arora & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's decision not to prosecute.
State v. Vimal Kumar @ Karwa
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal against acquittal in a POCSO sexual assault case, holding that material contradictions in the victim's testimony and lack of corroborative evidence created reasonable doubt, entitling the accused to benefit of doubt.
Ayush Jain v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed proceedings against a resigned director under Section 138 NI Act due to forged signatures and lack of responsibility for the company’s business at the relevant time.
Union of India v. Ritu Chaudhary
The Delhi High Court upheld the quashing of delayed disciplinary proceedings against government employees due to absence of witnesses and original documents, emphasizing the necessity of timely and properly substantiated charges.
Union of India v. Ritu Chaudhary
The Delhi High Court upheld the quashing of delayed disciplinary proceedings lacking witnesses and original documents, affirming that unexplained delay and failure to prove charges vitiate such proceedings.
Union of India v. Ritu Chaudhary
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's quashing of delayed disciplinary proceedings lacking witness proof and original documents, emphasizing procedural fairness and timely action under Central Civil Services Rules.
Union of India v. Ritu Chaudhary
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's quashing of delayed disciplinary proceedings lacking original documents and witness lists, emphasizing the necessity of timely action and proper proof in government service misconduct cases.
Rajesh Rai v. Union of India; Raj Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court expunged arbitrary below benchmark ACR gradings and directed grant of NFU from 1st July 2008, affirming judicial review against irrational service record assessments.
Shehzad v. State; Sumit v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for robbery and use of a deadly weapon under Section 397 IPC despite non-recovery of the knife, emphasizing credible witness testimony and medical evidence as sufficient proof.