Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Javed & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and criminal proceedings following an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's withdrawal of prosecution.
Devender Sharma v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties.
Ankit Tomar & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Pawan Kumar Gupta v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the rejection of the petitioner’s juvenility plea, holding that the Supreme Court’s prior adjudication bars re-litigation of age determination under section 7A of the Juvenile Justice Act.
B. L. Naik v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld a uniform retirement age of 60 years for CAPF personnel, ruling that those retired before the judgment date are entitled only to recalculated pension benefits and not to rejoining service.
ANEUSER BUSCH INBEV INDIA LIMITED v. COMMISSIONER (EXCISE, ENTERTAINMENT AND LUXURY TAX)
The Delhi High Court quashed the blacklisting order against the petitioner for failure to issue a proper show cause notice, holding that principles of natural justice were violated and such defects cannot be cured by appellate proceedings.
B. L. Naik v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the rationality of fixing the judgment date as cut-off for uniform retirement age benefits in CAPFs, dismissing petitions of those retired earlier seeking continuation in service or enhanced pension options.
B. L. Naik v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of implementing a uniform retirement age of 60 years for CAPFs from the date of its judgment, denying pre-judgment retirees the option to rejoin service but granting pensionary benefits.
B. L. Naik v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the uniform retirement age of 60 years for CAPF personnel effective from the Dev Sharma judgment date, denying continuation options to those retired earlier but granting adjusted pensionary benefits.
Bharat Singh & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed extension of uniform retirement age benefits to all CAPF personnel who retired before 31 January 2019 but had not attained 60 years, affirming non-discrimination and broad applicability of its earlier judgment.
Bharat Singh & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed uniform extension of retirement age benefits to all CAPF personnel retired before 31 January 2019 but under 60 years, affirming non-discrimination and uniformity in service conditions.
Bharat Singh & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed uniform extension of retirement age benefits and pensionary recalculations to all CAPF personnel retired before 31 January 2019 but under 60 years, affirming the non-discriminatory principle established in Dev Sharma.
Capital Ventures Pvt. Ltd. v. KRBL Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a contempt petition alleging forum shopping in IPR suits, directing an administrative enquiry and continuation of interim measures to ensure transparent case listing.
Bharat Singh & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed extension of uniform retirement age benefits and consequential pensionary relief to all CAPF personnel retired before the judgment date but under 60 years, affirming non-discrimination and uniform treatment principles.
Rohtash (Deceased) Thr Lrs v. Satbir & Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that successive suits on the same cause of action filed without court's permission after withdrawal without liberty are barred under Order XXIII Rule 1 CPC.
Sushila Bhatt v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that the first appellate court must independently appreciate evidence and decide criminal appeals on merits rather than remanding cases without clear findings.
Bharat Singh & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed uniform extension of retirement age benefits to all CAPF personnel who retired before 31 January 2019 but had not attained 60 years, affirming non-discrimination and broad applicability of its earlier judgment.
Bharat Singh & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed extension of uniform retirement age benefits and adjusted pensionary benefits to all CAPF personnel who retired before 31st January 2019 but had not attained 60 years, affirming the principle of non-discrimination irrespective of party status.
Manish & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323, 452, 506, and 34 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Bharat Singh & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Union of India to extend uniform retirement age benefits and associated pension calculations to all CAPF personnel who retired before 31 January 2019 but had not attained 60 years, affirming non-discrimination and broad applicability of its earlier judgment.