Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
M/S ICICI BANK LIMITED v. SANTOSH KUMAR
The Delhi High Court directed Trial Courts to follow a prescribed procedure and dispose of applications for appointment of receivers and sale of hypothecated vehicles expeditiously, allowing ICICI Bank to sell the vehicle by public auction after due notice.
M/S ICICI BANK LIMITED v. JITENDRA CHATURVEDI
The Delhi High Court directed trial courts to expeditiously dispose of applications for appointment of receivers and permission to sell hypothecated vehicles in loan recovery suits, allowing ICICI Bank to sell the vehicle by public auction under prescribed safeguards.
M/S ICICI BANK LIMITED v. PANKAJ
The Delhi High Court directed expeditious disposal of applications for appointment of receivers and sale of hypothecated vehicles in loan recovery suits, endorsing a detailed procedure for repossession and public auction with borrower notice.
M/S ICICI BANK LIMITED v. SACHIN KUMAR
The Delhi High Court directed Trial Courts to expeditiously dispose of applications for appointment of receivers and sale of hypothecated vehicles in loan default cases, following prescribed procedural safeguards to protect vehicle value and ensure fair recovery.
M/S ICICI BANK LIMITED v. DEEPANSHU BANSAL & ANR
The Delhi High Court directed expeditious disposal of applications for appointment of receivers and sale of hypothecated vehicles in loan default cases, prescribing a detailed procedure to protect parties' rights and facilitate recovery.
M/S ICICI BANK LIMITED v. PRADEEP KUMAR
The Delhi High Court directed Trial Courts to follow a prescribed procedure and dispose expeditiously applications for appointment of receiver and sale of hypothecated vehicles in loan recovery suits, allowing ICICI Bank to sell the vehicle by public auction with due notice.
U R Dubey v. Assam Company India Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that a suit for recovery of salary dues based on a written contract falls under Order XXXVII CPC and must be treated as a summary suit with summons issued accordingly, setting aside the Trial Court's order treating it as an ordinary suit.
Mohd Anees v. Noor Hasan
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition against an eviction order as withdrawn on the tenant's undertaking to vacate the premises by a specified date and pay use and occupation charges, staying execution of the eviction order accordingly.
Sat Narain Mittal & Anr v. Radhey Shyam Gupta Thr Lrs
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging eviction after the tenant undertook to vacate the premises by a specified date and pay use and occupation charges, staying execution of the eviction order subject to conditions.
Samrat Ray & Ors. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's decision not to pursue prosecution.
Rajiv Tyagi & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR and proceedings based on an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's refusal to prosecute further.
Delhi Subordinate Service Selection Board v. Puneet Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's order setting aside the cancellation of a recruitment exam, holding that innocent candidates cannot be arbitrarily penalized for irregularities affecting others.
Delhi Subordinate Service Selection Board v. Puneet Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's order setting aside the cancellation of a recruitment exam for six cleared candidates, emphasizing that cancellation of an entire selection process is arbitrary when innocent candidates can be segregated from tainted ones.
Raj Kumar v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court held that a displaced person occupying public land before 15th August 1950 and meeting the Gadgil Assurance Scheme criteria is entitled to plot allotment, rejecting extraneous grounds and directing the DDA to allot the plot.
Golden Times Services Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT
The Delhi High Court held that the ITAT must decide appeals on merits and that limitation for recall applications under Section 254(2) begins from actual knowledge of the order, quashing the ITAT's dismissal of recall application solely on limitation grounds.
M/S INTER ADS EXHIBITION PVT LTD v. BUSWORLD INTERNATIONAL COOPERATIEVE VENNOOTSCHAP MET BEPERKTE ANASPRAKELIJKHEID
The Delhi High Court held that a determinable joint venture contract validly terminated on breach cannot be restored or specifically enforced under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act, and the petitioner’s remedy lies in arbitration for damages.
Nand Ram v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging municipal actions on unauthorized construction as offshoots of a civil dispute, upholding the appellate tribunal's order and directing SDMC to act per law.
Salim Hussain v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner's writ challenging rejection of furlough, holding that the delay in surrender was satisfactorily explained and the punishment order had been set aside, thus the denial was unjustified.
Salim Hussain v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court quashed a jail punishment for conspiracy imposed without supporting police chargesheet, emphasizing the primacy of police investigation and criminal trial over internal jail disciplinary actions.
Rakesh & Anr. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking transfer of criminal proceedings from Dwarka Courts to Patiala House Courts, holding that unsubstantiated allegations of threat do not justify transfer under Section 482 CrPC.