Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. JITENDER PAL SINGH
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal and upheld a 50% liability apportionment for a head-on collision caused by the offending vehicle's rash driving and contributory negligence of the car driver.
Axalta Coating System Pvt. Ltd v. M/S Grand Auto Capital & Ors.
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, holding that the Court's role is limited to verifying the existence and validity of the arbitration agreement, especially when respondents do not appear.
The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Som Dutt Sharma & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the MACT's award of compensation for a fatal motor accident, rejecting contributory negligence and confirming the entitlement of the deceased's dependent despite her death during the claim pendency.
Kamal Kishore v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 304-A IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement and compensation paid to the deceased's legal heirs, applying the inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Kapil Singh Gaur and Anr. v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed municipal authorities to consider petitioners' representations and take expeditious action to maintain cleanliness near a canal, disposing of the public interest litigation accordingly.
ANAND CIS (INDIA) PVT LTD v. THE COMMISSIONER VALUE ADDED TAX DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND TAXES
The Delhi High Court directed the VAT Department to decide the petitioner's refund claim with interest under the Delhi VAT Act, considering the principle of unjust enrichment, expeditiously and in accordance with law.
Renuka Sharma v. The Sr Divisional Manager, LIC of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the removal of an employee for unauthorized absence, ruling that disciplinary punishment cannot be challenged on grounds of parity with other employees who were wrongly treated leniently.
Madan Mohan Sharma v. Kishan Gupta & Anr
The High Court dismissed the petitioner's objections to execution proceedings for lack of original title documents, upholding the decree holder's possession decree affirmed by the Supreme Court.
Dr. Kulbhushan Sehgal v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a project employee with over 15 years of continuous service in ICMR is entitled to regularisation in a vacant Scientist post, setting aside the CAT's dismissal of his claim.
Ritesh Jindal v. Kanta Devi
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to summon complete bank records and witnesses for effective defence in a Section 138 NI Act case, setting aside the Trial Court’s order that had closed defence evidence.
Sh. Ravinder Singh Raghav v. Sh. Lokesh Upadhyay
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's closure of the petitioner's right to cross-examine the complainant in a cheque dishonour case due to non-filing of a required application under Section 145(2) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, dismissing the petition for lack of sufficient cause.
Dr. Hans U. Nagar v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the SDM's order directing removal of a gate on a private road, held that Section 133 Cr.P.C. requires jurisdictional facts of obstruction on a public or common passage, and directed appointment of security guards to ensure free passage pending further proceedings.
Kulpreet @ Manni v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 341, 506, and 354 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's withdrawal of prosecution.
D.T.C. v. Samay Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court’s finding that the disciplinary inquiry against a conductor was perverse and reinstated him with 50% back wages due to the management’s failure to prove misconduct.
Mr.Amit Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Archana Sahadeva, Mr.Soham Kumar, Advs. v. DRUGS CONTROLLER GENERAL OF INDIA AND ANR. .....
The Delhi High Court upheld the ban on Etodolac + Paracetamol FDC but set aside the ban on S(+) Etodolac + Paracetamol FDC for lack of separate expert consideration, remanding the matter for fresh evaluation.
Dinesh Kumar Chauhan & Ors. v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement and the complainant's decision not to pursue prosecution.
Pardeep Chauhan @ Kitty v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR arising from a domestic dispute under Sections 308, 342, and 506 IPC after the parties settled amicably and were living together, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Devendra Jain v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 354A IPC and Section 8 POCSO Act based on an amicable settlement and no objection from the victim and her guardian.
IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. JITENDER PAL SINGH
The Delhi High Court upheld the MACT's award apportioning 50% liability on the insurance company for a head-on collision caused by a vehicle driving on the wrong side, while also finding contributory negligence on the car driver.
IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. JITENDER PAL SINGH
The Delhi High Court upheld the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's award apportioning 50% liability to the appellant insurance company for a head-on collision, finding contributory negligence on the car driver.