Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Aakash Packaging v. Arenel (Private) Limited
The Bombay High Court set aside an arbitral award for rejecting admitted contemporaneous evidence and relying on hearsay, holding it conflicted with public policy and shocked the conscience of the Court.
Mahadeo Sitaram Navale; Chaturabai Mahadeo Navale v. Baputao Ramchandra Navale & Ors.
The High Court allowed the second appeal, setting aside the decree for specific performance of an ancestral property sale agreement held to be a security for loans, and upheld the trial court's dismissal of the suit.
ICRA Limited v. Naresh Takkar
The Delhi High Court held that amounts payable under an arbitral award and settlement constitute judgment debts exempt from TDS deduction, directing the deductor to seek refund of wrongly deducted TDS from tax authorities.
JV Industries Pvt Ltd v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that redemption fine under the Central Excise Act is covered as penalty under the SVLDR Scheme and waived upon payment of duty, directing refund of encashed redemption fine and issuance of discharge certificate.
Lokesh Pathak v. Designated Committee, SVLDRS, Central GST, Delhi West
The Delhi High Court held that redemption fine is covered under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme's waiver of penalty and duty, allowing petitioners to avail scheme benefits and directing issuance of discharge certificates.
Gaurav Jain v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that redemption fine is covered under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme and discharge certificates must be issued for show cause notices involving confiscation upon payment of prescribed duty, overruling the CBIC's exclusion of redemption fine.
Remco Industries India v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that redemption fine is covered under the SVLDR Scheme as penalty or duty, and taxpayers who pay the settled amount, even with minor delays due to technical glitches, are entitled to discharge certificates and relief from further proceedings.
Radhey Shyam Aggarwal v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that redemption fine is covered under the penalty waiver of the Sabka Vishwas Scheme, and discharge certificates must be issued without requiring separate payment of redemption fine.
Meeta Singh v. Union of India & Anr.
Writ petitions challenging resignations tendered over two decades ago were dismissed on grounds of inordinate delay and laches without examining merits, applying principles of constructive res judicata and Order II Rule 2 CPC.
M/S MONEYWISE FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT. LTD v. MAHAVEER ENTERPRISES THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR AND ANR.
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that the Court's role is limited to prima facie examination of the arbitration agreement's existence without delving into arbitrability or validity.
Anything Skool Ltd. v. Liberty Footwear Company
The Delhi High Court disposed of long-pending family business appeals due to repeated failed settlement attempts, granting liberty to revive if disputes remain unresolved.
CLIX CAPITAL SERVICES PVT LTD v. SH RAJENDRA PRASAD SINGH
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act after prima facie finding of a valid arbitration agreement, emphasizing limited judicial scrutiny and deferring substantive disputes to arbitration.
Chootu v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentence of a minor girl's sexual assault under Section 376(2)(g) IPC based on credible prosecutrix testimony corroborated by medical and forensic evidence, dismissing the appellant's appeal.
Ashish Chopra v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed illegal tax demands and refund adjustments against the petitioner arising from employer defaults, directing removal of demands from the portal and refund of adjusted amounts.
Mahendra Kumar Jhanwar v. Income Tax Officer Ward 36(1) New Delhi
The Delhi High Court remanded the reassessment proceedings under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act for the Assessing Officer to decide the limitation and validity issues through a reasoned order in light of recent judicial precedents.
Kanodia Technoplast Ltd v. DCIT, CEN CIR 19, Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed a reassessment notice issued beyond the three-year limitation period and involving escaped income below Rs. 50 lakhs, holding such proceedings invalid under the Income Tax Act, 1961.
M/S SPML INFRA LIMITED v. MIS BHAVANI ENTERPRISES
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, upholding the arbitral award for claim no.1 as within limitation and separable from other barred claims.
Chegg India Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner CGST Mohan Cooperative Industrial Estate
The Delhi High Court held that the GST Appellate Authority has full power to reconsider refund claims afresh and remanded the matter for comprehensive adjudication to avoid contradictory findings on export of services and ITC refund claims.
Soham Ramesh Kumbhar v. National Medical Commission
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking a fifth attempt at the Phase I MBBS exam, holding that the four-attempt limit under the Graduate Medical Education Regulations is mandatory and cannot be relaxed by the Court on compassionate grounds.
SU KAM POWER SYSTEMS LIMITED v. OFFICE OF REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES AND ANR.
The Delhi High Court held that a company sold as a going concern under the IBC cannot be held liable for offences committed prior to the sale, and prosecution lies only against the officers in default at the relevant time.