Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Indian Bank and another v. Mahaveer Khariwal
The Supreme Court upheld the employee's voluntary retirement under Regulation 29 of the Indian Bank Employees Pension Regulations, 1995, quashing the employer's rejection and subsequent disciplinary actions as illegal.
Indian Bank v. Mahaveer Khariwal
The Supreme Court upheld the employee's voluntary retirement under Regulation 29 of the Indian Bank Employees Pension Regulations, 1995, quashing the employer's rejection and invalidating subsequent disciplinary actions.
Anjali Brahmawar Chauhan v. Navin Chauhan
The Supreme Court dismissed the review petition and allowed matrimonial trial proceedings via video conferencing during the COVID-19 pandemic despite prior restrictions.
Anjali Brahmawar Chauhan v. Navin Chauhan
The Supreme Court dismissed the review petition and directed matrimonial trial proceedings to be conducted via video conferencing during the COVID-19 pandemic despite prior restrictions on such practice.
MS. X v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
The Supreme Court directed the State of Jharkhand to ensure protection, free education for minor children, housing assistance, and legal aid to a rape victim facing social ostracism and identity disclosure.
MS. X v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
The Supreme Court directed the State of Jharkhand to ensure protection, free education, housing assistance, and legal aid to a rape victim and her minor children, emphasizing statutory and constitutional safeguards including prohibition of victim identity disclosure.
HARYANA SPACE APPLICATION CENTRE (HARSAC) v. M/S PAN INDIA CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD.
The Supreme Court invalidated the appointment of a government official as arbitrator due to conflict of interest and appointed a sole arbitrator to conclude delayed arbitration proceedings within six months.
HARYANA SPACE APPLICATION CENTRE (HARSAC) v. M/S PAN INDIA CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD.
The Supreme Court invalidated the appointment of a government official as arbitrator due to conflict of interest and appointed a sole arbitrator to complete delayed arbitration proceedings within six months.
Siddharth Murarka v. Supreme Court of India
The Supreme Court permitted a sole proprietor Advocate on Record to use a professional style on letterheads and Vakalatnamas while leaving any broader change to registration styles to the rule-making authorities.
Siddharth Murarka v. Supreme Court of India
The Supreme Court permitted an Advocate on Record to use a sole proprietorship style name on letterheads and Vakalatnamas while leaving broader changes to registration styles to Rule-making authorities.
State of Uttarakhand v. Sureshwati
The Supreme Court held that absence of a domestic enquiry does not automatically invalidate termination; the Labour Court may examine evidence on merits, and the employee must prove continuous service to claim protection against retrenchment.
State of Uttarakhand & Ors. v. Sureshwati
The Supreme Court held that absence of a domestic enquiry does not invalidate termination if the employer justifies it with evidence, and the employee fails to prove continuous employment and illegal termination.
Delhi Tamil Education Association v. Director of Education and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that aided linguistic minority schools have constitutional and statutory autonomy to fill vacancies of Principals and teachers without prior DoE approval, setting aside the DoE’s rejection based on alleged absence of Managing Committees.
Garg Builders v. Hindustan Prefab Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that parties must follow the contractually stipulated dispute resolution procedure before arbitration and that the court's role at the arbitrator appointment stage is limited to verifying the arbitration agreement's existence.
Bajranga v. The State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors
The Supreme Court held that acquisition of surplus land under the Madhya Pradesh Ceiling Act must await the decision of a pending civil suit on title, and failure to comply with statutory procedural safeguards invalidates such acquisition.
Bajranga v. The State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors
The Supreme Court held that acquisition of surplus land under the Madhya Pradesh Ceiling Act must be stayed pending a civil court's decision on title disputes, and failure to comply with statutory procedural safeguards vitiates acquisition proceedings.
Lakhvir Singh v. State of Punjab
The Supreme Court allowed probation under Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act to appellants under 21 at the time of offence despite mandatory minimum sentence under Section 397 IPC, emphasizing rehabilitation over strict imprisonment.
Lakhvir Singh v. The State of Punjab & Anr.
The Supreme Court held that young offenders under 21 years at the time of offence are entitled to probation under Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, notwithstanding the mandatory minimum sentence under Section 397 IPC, and released the appellants on probation after serving half their sentence.
Rama Narang v. Ramesh Narang
The Supreme Court held the respondents guilty of civil contempt for wilful disobedience of its consent orders regarding joint management of a family company, upheld the validity of CLB’s intervention to resolve deadlock, and emphasized strict compliance with court undertakings.
Rama Narang v. Ramesh Narang
The Supreme Court held that wilful disobedience of its consent orders in a family company dispute constitutes civil contempt, upheld the validity of statutory authority orders regulating company management, and emphasized compliance with court undertakings and statutory provisions.