Search Judgments

Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name

Ajay Kumar Bhagat and Ors. v. B.L. Sherwal and Anr.

Delhi High Court · 31 Dec 1991 · 2023:DHC:5402

The Delhi High Court dismissed a civil contempt petition for non-compliance of an interim order due to delay beyond the one-year limitation period under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

civil petition_dismissed

Bank of Baroda v. Devshi Valji Kundadia

High Court of Bombay · 28 Sep 1991

The Bombay High Court upheld the industrial tribunal’s setting aside of a bank employee’s dismissal for misappropriation due to perverse enquiry findings and unreliable evidence, directing reinstatement with 60% backwages.

labor appeal_dismissed

Ari Singh (Deceased) Thr. LRs v. UOI

Delhi High Court · 22 Jul 1991 · 2024:DHC:563

The Delhi High Court dismissed a restoration application filed after a 25-year delay due to insufficient grounds for condonation of delay and upheld the dismissal of the original appeal for default.

civil appeal_dismissed

Gammon India Limited v. Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd.

High Court of Bombay · 09 Jul 1991

The Bombay High Court upheld the setting aside of an arbitral award on claims relating to electricity charges, price variation, and excavation costs, affirming limited judicial interference under Sections 34 and 37 of the Arbitration Act.

civil appeal_dismissed

Anwar Liyakat Khan v. Ramesh Dattatraya Dhone

High Court of Bombay · 27 Feb 1991

The High Court held that a consent decree obtained by fraud can be recalled by the court which passed it, even on application by third parties, and that the bar on suits under Order XXIII Rule 3A CPC applies to all, but does not preclude recall applications under Section 151 CPC.

civil appeal_allowed

Genarosa A. Annes and Ors. v. Haji Esmail Haji Essa Supariwala and Ors.

High Court of Bombay · 09 Jan 1991

The High Court upheld eviction of tenant from part of premises after finding tenancy was split by surrender of other portions by joint tenant, rejecting plea of indivisible tenancy and invalid demand notice.

civil appeal_dismissed

Vipin Kumar and Anr v. Union Public Service Commission and Ors

Delhi High Court · 20 Sep 1990 · 2025:DHC:345-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld UPSC's recruitment process, ruling that introducing a screening test with 50% interview weightage before commencement was lawful and not arbitrary.

administrative appeal_dismissed

Suhas Damodar Sathe v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

High Court of Bombay · 07 Feb 1990

The Bombay High Court held that a development agreement conferring extensive proprietary rights constitutes a conveyance under the Maharashtra Stamp Act, attracting higher stamp duty and penalty.

tax petition_dismissed

M. Yogeshwar Raj v. Air India Limited

High Court of Bombay · 04 Feb 1990

The Bombay High Court held that writ petitions under Article 226 are not maintainable against Air India Limited post-privatization as it ceased to be a 'State' under Article 12, while recognizing the limited scope of writ jurisdiction against private entities performing public functions.

constitutional petition_dismissed

Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors. v. Inder Jit Dua

Delhi High Court · 20 Sep 1989

The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's order granting Selection Grade under the Career Advancement Scheme to a regularised Lecturer without requiring a Master's degree, affirming that CAS benefits extend to pre-1996 recruits appointed by upgradation.

administrative appeal_dismissed

Vithoba Bua Sodmise and Ors. v. Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal and Ors.

High Court of Bombay · 28 Apr 1989

The court upheld the rejection of a tenancy case that sought to reopen a compromise decree, holding such proceedings barred by res judicata and dismissing the petition challenging the same.

property petition_dismissed

Milton Plastics Limited v. Mudit Nagpal & Ors.

High Court of Bombay · 01 Apr 1989

The Bombay High Court held that reopening of income tax assessment beyond four years without tangible material showing failure to disclose material facts is invalid and quashed the reassessment notice and order for Assessment Year 1997-98.

tax petition_allowed

M/s. S V Jadhav v. The Income Tax Officer Ward 1, Sangli

High Court of Bombay · 01 Apr 1989

The Bombay High Court quashed the reassessment notice and order under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, holding that the Assessing Officer lacked valid reason to believe that income had escaped assessment after accepting the assessee's explanation.

tax petition_allowed

Suresh Dnyane Tanpure v. Deputy Collector, Rehabilitation

High Court of Bombay · 31 Mar 1989

The Bombay High Court dismissed petitions seeking alternate land allotment under the 1999 Act for land acquired in 1989, holding the Act is not retrospective and the claims are barred by delay and laches.

administrative petition_dismissed

Sabu Trade Pvt Ltd v. Raj Kumar Sabu

Delhi High Court · 20 Mar 1989 · 2024:DHC:2072

The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction in favor of RKS/STC restraining defendants from using the SACHAMOTI trademark, upholding the prima facie validity of registered trademark rights pending trial.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed

K. Gupta v. Najma W/o. Ramzanali Rasekhinejad And Ors.

High Court of Bombay · 02 Dec 1988

The Bombay High Court dismissed the appeal challenging eviction from a disputed room held in breach of an interim order, upholding the City Civil Court's direction to restore possession to the Court Receiver.

civil appeal_dismissed

Nizamuddin Husainsaheb Pirjade v. The State of Maharashtra

High Court of Bombay · 01 Dec 1988

The Bombay High Court dismissed the petition challenging land acquisition due to inordinate delay and held that acquisition does not lapse if possession or compensation is taken, reaffirming the discretionary nature of writ relief in stale claims.

property petition_dismissed

Sakhubai Baburao Kadam and others v. Sudhakar Sambhaji Kadam and others

High Court of Bombay · 24 Nov 1988

The High Court upheld eviction of tenant for default in rent payment, holding that clandestine deposits in Court without landlord's knowledge do not constitute valid payment under the Bombay Rent Act.

civil petition_dismissed

Vijay Parbati Sashte v. Commissioner of Police, Pune & Ors.

High Court of Bombay · 16 Jun 1988

The High Court quashed a detention order due to an unexplained two-month delay by prison authorities in forwarding the detenue's representation, violating constitutional safeguards under Article 22(5).

criminal appeal_allowed

Umar Ali Shakir Shaikh v. Commissioner of Police, Pune

High Court of Bombay · 16 Jun 1988

The Bombay High Court quashed a preventive detention order due to unexplained delay by jail authorities in forwarding the detenue's representation, violating his fundamental rights under Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

constitutional petition_allowed