Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Rajesh Kumar & Ors. v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 323/308/34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.
Nargis Kalra v. The Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted Letters of Administration to the petitioner, a Class I legal heir, for the Testator's Will, dispensing with the administrative-cum-surety bond requirement in an uncontested succession matter.
M/S PINEAPPLE INFRA PROJECTS LTD v. SANTOSH KAUR & ORS
The High Court held that a plaint cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC based on defendants' pleadings or documents and upheld the Trial Court's order dismissing the petitioner's application for rejection of plaint in a partition suit.
M/S Swarn Cosmetics (India) v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of digitally authenticated GST Show Cause Notices and orders, held pre-consultation notices under amended Rule 142(1A) discretionary, and directed the petitioner to pursue statutory appellate remedies.
Sunita Shah v. Commissioner of Customs, IGI Airport & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside a customs confiscation order for non-issuance of a valid Show Cause Notice and directed unconditional release of seized gold bangles, emphasizing mandatory procedural compliance and natural justice.
M/S R GUPTA METAL STORE v. CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DELHI NORTH
The Delhi High Court held that writ petitions challenging orders involving fraudulent availment of Input Tax Credit under the CGST Act are not maintainable and directed the petitioner to pursue statutory appellate remedies.
M/S SWARN COSMETIC (INDIA) v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order for failure to afford the petitioner a hearing, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of extension notifications pending before the Supreme Court.
Shree Balajee Traders v. Sales Tax Officer Class II Avato Ward 71 & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order for failure to afford the petitioner an opportunity to be heard, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of extension notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.
M/S HARI CATERING SERVICES v. Union of India & Ors.
Delhi High Court granted a 7-month extension to a catering stall licensee at Mahesana Railway Station, affirming its jurisdiction and relying on prior similar orders under the uniform Indian Railways Catering Policy, 2017.
Seema Devi & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioners to file a regularization application for unauthorized construction and restrained demolition pending its consideration with a personal hearing under Section 248 of the Cantonment Act, 2006.
Jyoti Jain v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted petitioners liberty to seek temporary desealing of properties sealed for unauthorized construction, subject to compliance with MCD directions and regularization procedures.
Rashtriya Rajdhani Kshetra Tipahiya Chalak Union Delhi Regd v. The Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to allow auto-taxi operators to continue parking at Anand Vihar Railway Station on payment of prescribed charges and submission of declarations, restraining arbitrary displacement or additional charges without a reasoned order.
Shriram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Nisha Sharma & Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal, upholding the Tribunal's award of compensation to the legal heirs of a deceased victim in a motor accident caused by rash and negligent driving.
DR REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED & ORS v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR
The Delhi High Court upheld FSSAI's regulatory ban on using 'ORS' in food product names to prevent consumer confusion and protect public health, dismissing the petition challenging the orders.
S.K. Singhal v. Union of India & Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's review petition and refused to allow new documents post-conclusion, affirming the limited scope of review and the lawfulness of disciplinary proceedings under CCS (CCA) Rules.
Taruna v. State Through SHO PS Jahangir Puri & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking Habeas Corpus relief over alleged fraudulent adoption, holding that disputed factual issues and delay render the writ petition not maintainable.
Staff Selection Commission and Others v. Dinesh Chandra
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing the Staff Selection Commission to empanel the respondent, ruling that administrative lapses in obtaining verification reports cannot prejudice a candidate's empanelment rights.
Union of India v. Laxman Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT order granting Group A classification and attendant benefits to certain officers from the date of the 2009 office memorandum, dismissing the Union of India's challenge.
Mohd Shafi v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to treat the writ petition as a representation and pass a reasoned order within four weeks, allowing the petitioner to seek further remedies if aggrieved.
V Balasubramanian v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Tribunal's dismissal of a contempt petition, holding that delay in deciding a transfer representation without mala fide does not amount to contempt.