Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Atul Mohan v. Punjab National Bank
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging termination for prolonged unauthorized absence, holding that absence without substantiated medical cause and failure to join duty justifies dismissal under bank disciplinary regulations.
Neha Malav v. Dean (Admissions Branch), University of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that courts will not direct fresh counselling rounds after admission closure, especially where the candidate scored below the last cut-off marks.
CRPL Infra Private Limited & Anr. v. Ministry of Food Processing Industries, Government of India
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal directing reconsideration of grant eligibility under the PMKSY Scheme, holding that only pre-EOI expenditure can be excluded and that denial based on project nearing completion or finality clauses is arbitrary and unsustainable.
Vedanta Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 25(1)
The Delhi High Court set aside the reassessment order under Section 148A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and remanded the matter for fresh consideration in light of a subsequent GST order closing proceedings on the same issue.
Dr. Aditya Sehrawat v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the transfer of a paramilitary medical officer, holding that adequate medical facilities exist at the new posting and that transfer orders should not be interfered with absent violation of guidelines or extreme hardship.
Dr Aniruddha Narayan Malpani v. The Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging an appointment as infructuous after the term of the appointed member expired.
Parag Prakash Rudrangi v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR alleging rape on false promise of marriage due to prolonged consensual relations, inconsistencies, and lack of corroborative evidence, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process.
Mangal Singh Rawat v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted the petitioner liberty to appeal against a demolition order and stayed coercive action for eight weeks without expressing any opinion on the merits.
Aman Carriers v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside IOCL's holiday listing of a vendor for an inadvertent bid format error, holding that blacklisting requires a valid show cause notice and cannot be imposed without due process.
Union of India & Ors. v. MWO Surendra Kumar Retd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's petition and upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension to a retired Air Force personnel suffering from Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that such disability is attributable to military service unless rebutted by clear evidence.
Jaya v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court permitted withdrawal of a writ petition to enable filing a fresh petition with the correct prayer clause, disposing the original petition as withdrawn.
Shriram General Insurance Company Ltd. v. Ashok Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company’s appeal against a motor accident compensation award, upholding 100% functional disability assessment and attendant charges for gratuitous family care.
Mukesh Kumar Verma v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a BSF disciplinary charge sheet, holding that courts should not interfere with valid disciplinary proceedings unless jurisdictional defects or absence of misconduct are shown.
M/S SHIV TOBACCO CO. v. VINOD KUMAR
The High Court of Delhi allowed the appellants to withdraw their appeal and disposed of the matter accordingly.
M/S Tharu and Sons Pvt Ltd v. Divisional Railway Manager Northern Railways
The Delhi High Court held that at the stage of appointing an arbitrator under Section 11, the Court's role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and arbitrability disputes must be decided by the arbitrator.
Sh. Ravinder Goel v. Sh. Ashwani Arora
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, the court’s role is limited to prima facie satisfaction of an arbitration agreement’s existence and appointed an arbitrator accordingly.
Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. P.R. Thareja Prop Goldy Constructions Company and Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed MCD's appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act, upholding the arbitral award and affirming limited judicial interference in arbitration matters.
Poonawalla Fincorp Limited v. Up Money Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator and directed arbitration proceedings under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, dismissing the petition for interim relief and leaving all substantive issues to be decided by the arbitrator.
Hakam Rai Takkar v. State (Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted probate to the petitioner as Executor of a duly executed Will under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 in an uncontested proceeding.
Dr. Kirti Sharma v. Dr. Kapil Parasha
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's dismissal of a perjury complaint in matrimonial proceedings, holding that minor contradictory statements do not warrant prosecution under Section 340 CrPC unless expedient in the interest of justice.