Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Deputy Superintendent of Police v. R. Soundirarasu
The Supreme Court held that at the discharge stage in disproportionate assets cases under the Prevention of Corruption Act, the prosecution need only establish a prima facie case and the accused must satisfactorily account for assets, setting aside the High Court's discharge of accused for improper evaluation of evidence.
Gopalbhai Panchabhai Zalavadia v. The State of Gujarat
The Supreme Court upheld the State Government's lawful possession and mutation of agricultural land under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, dismissing the appellants' claims for restoration of possession.
Pushpalata v. Vijay Kumar
The Supreme Court held that properties purchased by the father with his funds and held in the names of his minor sons were benami for the benefit of the HUF under Section 4(3)(a) of the Benami Transactions Act, allowing the appeal and decreeing the suit.
Adani Ports and Special Economic Zone Limited v. The Board of Trustees of Jawaharlal Nehru Port Authority & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that termination of a disputed concession agreement shall not disqualify the appellant from future tenders, leaving the validity of the tender qualification clause open for separate adjudication.
Adani Ports and Special Economic Zone Limited v. The Board of Trustees of Jawaharlal Nehru Port Authority & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that disputed termination of a concession agreement pending arbitration cannot disqualify a party from future tenders and left the validity of the tender clause open for separate challenge.
Beerbal Prasad Rajoriya v. State of Madhya Pradesh
The Supreme Court granted anticipatory bail in a delayed FIR case involving serious offences under Sections 376(2)(n) and 506 IPC, emphasizing cooperation and non-interference conditions.
Beerbal Prasad Rajoriya v. State of Madhya Pradesh
The Supreme Court granted anticipatory bail to the appellant in a serious criminal case due to delay in FIR and directed release on bail subject to conditions ensuring cooperation with investigation.
Peacock Industries Ltd. v. Union of India
The Supreme Court upheld the denial of excise duty refund where the returned goods were valued as scrap below the duty paid, affirming that refund value must be the market value of excisable goods under Section 173-L of the Central Excise Act.
Aastha Manoj Sonwane v. Manoj Tukaram Sonwane
The Supreme Court allowed the transfer of matrimonial proceedings under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act from Nashik to Dwarka and directed the Family Court to explore settlement through mediation.
Aastha Manoj Sonwane v. Manoj Tukaram Sonwane
The Supreme Court allowed the transfer petition to move matrimonial proceedings under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act from Nashik to Dwarka Family Court, directing mediation and record transmission.
Surbhi Goyal (Agrawal) v. Ashutosh Banka
The Supreme Court allowed the transfer of a divorce petition from the Family Court in Uttar Pradesh to the Family Court in Bihar for convenience and proper adjudication.
Pinki v. Abhishek Kumar Singh
The Supreme Court allowed the transfer of a matrimonial proceeding from the Family Court, Gurugram to the Family Court, Arwal, Bihar, emphasizing convenience and fairness.
Pinki v. Abhishek Kumar Singh
The Supreme Court allowed the petitioner’s transfer petition, directing the matrimonial case filed in Gurugram Family Court to be transferred to the Family Court at Arwal, Bihar for convenience and proper adjudication.
Neelam Parashar v. Shashank Sharma
The Supreme Court dismissed the petition seeking transfer of a matrimonial case from the Family Court in Uttar Pradesh to Delhi, holding no sufficient grounds for transfer were made out.
Aprajita Chakraborty v. Anirban Biswangri
The Supreme Court allowed the transfer of a matrimonial petition from the Family Court at Thane to a competent court at Gaya, directing mediation and immediate transmission of records.
Aprajita Chakraborty v. Anirban Biswangri
The Supreme Court allowed the transfer petition to move a matrimonial dispute from the Family Court at Thane to the competent court at Gaya, directing exploration of mediation.
Monika Kumari v. Abhishek Yadav
The Supreme Court allowed the transfer of matrimonial petitions from the Family Court at Jabalpur to the Family Court at Kota and directed the courts to consider mediation for settlement.
Monika Kumari v. Abhishek Yadav
The Supreme Court allowed the transfer of matrimonial petitions from the Family Court at Jabalpur to the Family Court at Kota and directed mediation efforts for settlement.
DR. SEEMA SIKKA v. DR. PRANAV SIKKA
The Supreme Court dismissed the transfer petitions seeking relocation of family law proceedings from Uttar Pradesh to Delhi and directed the Family Court to consider mediation for settlement.
DR. SEEMA SIKKA v. DR. PRANAV SIKKA
The Supreme Court dismissed the transfer petitions seeking to move family law proceedings from Uttar Pradesh to Delhi, emphasizing the need for sufficient cause for transfer and encouraging mediation.