Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Priyanka Singh v. Bimlesh Kumari & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Trial Court to expeditiously decide the petitioner’s application under Order XXXIX Rule 7 CPC while recognizing pandemic-related delays and declined to impose rigid time frames generally.
M/S DWARKESH DIAMONDS PVT LTD v. KULDEEP BAKSHI
The Delhi High Court held that leave to defend in a summary suit must be granted if triable issues exist, but where the defence is plausible yet improbable, conditional leave with deposit of the disputed amount is appropriate.
KRBL Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 13(1), Delhi
Delhi High Court directs Revenue to issue tax refund with interest and pass appeal effect orders within six weeks following favorable ITAT and CIT(A) decisions.
Devendra Singh v. Globe Detective Agency Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Labour Court’s rejection of illegal termination claim where the petitioner admitted non-termination and refusal to comply with transfer.
Bhopal Singh v. Urmila Devi & Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed the husband's appeal and granted divorce on the ground of irretrievable breakdown of marriage and mental cruelty despite adultery not being proved.
Aero Club v. Bhawna Trading Co. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages against defendants for infringement of the registered trademark 'WOODLAND', decreeing the suit ex-parte against one defendant and recording a settlement with the other.
Rajesh Sharma v. Kusum Lata
The Delhi High Court held that an application for leave to defend filed within time but before the wrong court due to inadvertent error must be treated as timely, and procedural mistakes should not defeat the right to defend in eviction proceedings.
Triloki v. Ashok Hotel
The Delhi High Court upheld illegal termination of a contractual employee but modified the award to enhance compensation in lieu of reinstatement, emphasizing the judicial trend favoring compensation over reinstatement in such cases.
M/S JIWAN AUTO PRIVATE LIMITED v. COMMISSIONER OF VAT & ANR.
The Delhi High Court directed payment of undisputed VAT refund with interest from the date petitioner was intimated to pursue the claim, rejecting the petitioner's request to limit interest to three years.
Rakesh Kumar Bhola v. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence Headquarters, New Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to an accused under the NDPS Act due to prolonged trial delay violating his right to speedy trial, balancing stringent bail conditions with constitutional liberty.
KRBL LIMITED v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 13(1) & ORS
The Delhi High Court directed the Revenue to pass appeal effect orders and release refunds with interest to the petitioner pursuant to the ITAT order, emphasizing statutory compliance and constitutional mandates.
M/S DWARKESH DIAMONDS PVT LTD v. URMIL BAKSHI
The Delhi High Court held that leave to defend in a summary suit must be granted unless the defence is frivolous, and where the defence is plausible but improbable, conditional leave with deposit may be imposed.
Ram Karan v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that compassionate appointment is a humanitarian concession, not a right, and dismissed the petition seeking such appointment after a long delay and in absence of available vacancies.
Bharat v. The State
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a POCSO case involving a minor niece, holding that consent of a minor is immaterial but bail is permissible after completion of investigation and filing of chargesheet under appropriate conditions.
Kaushalya Devi v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's discharge of accused from murder charges due to lack of prima facie evidence while affirming dowry-related charges against the husband, emphasizing the limited scope of charge framing and the need for further investigation if warranted.
Surjeet Kaur v. Sardar Raja Singh Oberoi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a secured creditor under the SARFAESI Act is neither a necessary nor proper party in a partition suit and dismissed the application for its impleadment.
MUFG BANK LTD v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 2
The Delhi High Court directed income tax authorities to comply with ITAT and High Court orders by passing appeal effect orders and issuing refunds to MUFG Bank Ltd within six weeks.
Bharat Construction Co Ltd v. Engineering Project India Ltd
The Delhi High Court allowed transfer of arbitration-related petitions to a single court to avoid parallel proceedings and conflicting judgments.
DLF Ltd. v. Alka Gupta
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the NCDRC's order allowing an affidavit authorizing individual prosecution of a jointly allotted flat complaint, leaving maintainability issues open for adjudication.
BELL SPORTS, INC. v. THE REGISTRAR OF TRADEMARKS
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal against cancellation of a trademark opposition due to alleged defective payment, holding that the Registrar must notify defects before the deadline to enable rectification and permitted fresh payment.