Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
International Merchandising Company v. Commissioner, Service Tax, New Delhi
The Supreme Court held that service tax applies to manpower supply services without requiring employer-employee relationship but reversed tax on programme producer services and disallowed extended limitation and penalty in a dispute involving interpretation of statutory provisions.
L. NARASIMHAIAH v. THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER
The Supreme Court dismissed the Review Petition for lack of any error apparent on record, after condoning the delay in filing.
L. Narasimhaiah v. The Divisional Controller
The Supreme Court dismissed the Review Petition for lack of any error apparent on record, condoning delay but refusing to interfere with its earlier decision in the Special Leave Petition.
State of Gujarat v. Pravinkumar R. Patel
The Supreme Court dismissed a Review Petition due to an unexplained delay of 794 days, refusing to condone the delay on limitation grounds.
State of Gujarat v. Pravinkumar R. Patel
The Supreme Court dismissed a Review Petition due to an unexplained delay of 794 days, refusing to condone the delay.
Naveen v. State of Haryana & Others
The Supreme Court held that the power to summon additional accused under Section 319 CrPC is extraordinary and requires strong evidence, and set aside the High Court’s order summoning the appellant due to insufficient evidence of complicity.
Naveen v. State of Haryana & Others
The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in summoning the appellant as an additional accused under Section 319 CrPC without strong and cogent evidence, and set aside the order summoning him.
Raghunath Behera v. State of Odisha
The provided text contains only the case title and an extensive list of diary numbers without substantive judgment content.
D. KRISHNA MOHAN v. HON’BLE SECRETARY
The Supreme Court dismissed the Review Petition and refused permission to list it in open court, holding that no grounds existed to justify interference with the earlier order.
Seema Khattar v. The Project and Equipment Corporation of India Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging termination of a public servant, holding that the disciplinary inquiry complied with natural justice and findings were supported by evidence.
Directorate of Enforcement v. PC Financial Services Private Limited
The Delhi High Court held that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 should not be exercised to bypass the statutory appellate remedy under the PMLA when the Appellate Tribunal is functional, and directed the appeal to be restored and decided on merits.
Ram Narain Prasad v. UOI & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the denial of second financial upgradation under the ACP Scheme, holding that the Screening Committee's administrative evaluation need not be disclosed or interfered with absent statutory mandate.
YORK TECH PVT. LTD. v. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
The Delhi High Court held that once a Letter of Intent accepting a bid is issued and complied with, the authority cannot arbitrarily withdraw the plot or reject the bid, quashing the DDA's withdrawal and directing issuance of demand letter and conveyance.
Constable Charan Singh v. Govt. of NCTD through the Commissioner of Police and Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside a cryptic Tribunal order dismissing a police constable's challenge to major punishment and remanded the matter for fresh consideration with a speaking order.
JK INTERIORS v. ANJU ALAGH
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition under Article 227 as not maintainable since an appeal remedy was available under the Code of Civil Procedure against the impugned civil court order.
Mukut House Developers Private Limited v. Gurinder Singh Kairon & Anr.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration Act despite the underlying agreement being allegedly unstamped, relying on the Supreme Court's directive to not stall arbitration proceedings pending Larger Bench decisions on stamp duty issues.
Union of India v. Premwati
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing payment of interest at the GPF rate on delayed ex-gratia compensation to the family of a deceased railway employee.
The Workman v. The Management of M/S Jai Prakash Associates Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that part of the cause of action arising in Delhi makes the Government of NCT of Delhi the appropriate government under the Industrial Disputes Act, setting aside the Labour Court's award for lack of jurisdiction and remanding the matter for adjudication.