Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Paramjit Singh Nagi v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a writ petition challenging a posting order under a superseded policy, granting liberty to pursue remedies under the current service policy.
Dharamvir Singh v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of an alternative plot allotment application under the Scheme of 1961, holding that the petitioner was ineligible due to residence in village deh abadi and failure to submit requisite documents despite repeated notices.
Alok Kumar Yadav and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to prepare and operate a Reserve Panel/Wait List and offer appointment to petitioners against vacancies arising within one year, upholding DoPT guidelines and prior judicial precedents.
ICICI BANK LTD v. Yogeshwar Sharma
Delhi High Court allowed the bank's appeal and appointed a receiver to take possession of a vehicle securing a defaulted loan, clarifying the applicability of CPC provisions over arbitration law in such suits.
Mona Sharma v. Vishal Gautam
The Delhi High Court set aside the direction to deposit keys of disputed property with the court, maintaining status quo possession and restraining alienation during pending civil suits between siblings.
Mohinder Singh Arora & Ors. v. State (N.C.T of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld a civil court's order directing production of documents related to disputed properties while emphasizing that applications challenging suit maintainability under Order VII Rule 11 CPC must be decided first.
Anil Goel v. Satish Goel
The Delhi High Court held that only parties served with a valid notice invoking arbitration under Section 21 can be referred to arbitration under Section 11, limiting arbitration to the two brothers and excluding other family members despite their signatures on the family settlement.
State NCT of Delhi v. Riyazuddin
The Delhi High Court held that an accused's indefeasible right to default bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. arises when the bail application is filed before the chargesheet, and subsequent filing of the chargesheet does not defeat this right.
Monty Bahadur Karotiya v. Commissioner of Police, Thane
The Bombay High Court quashed a preventive detention order for failure to furnish vital injury certificates to the detenu, violating his constitutional right to make an effective representation under Article 22(5).
Amol Ambadas Bankar & Amol Bhagwan Shende v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the conviction of appellants for murder based on strong circumstantial evidence including motive, recovery of incriminating articles, and DNA identification of the deceased.
KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LTD. & ANR. v. RUBFILA INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
The Supreme Court held that exemption from enhanced power tariff under the Kerala Government Order is available only from the date of commercial production, not energisation, and rejected the respondent's parity claim based on a withdrawn concession.
KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LTD. & ANR. v. RUBFILA INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
The Supreme Court held that exemption from enhanced power tariff under the Kerala Government Order is from the date of commercial production, not energisation, and rejected the respondent's claim to parity based on a withdrawn benefit granted to another unit.
Priya Dhawan & Anr. v. Delhi University & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the University of Delhi to correct the petitioners' and their father's names in its records in accordance with public documents, rejecting the university's requirement of a decree of separation for such change.
M/S PORNSRICHAROENPUN CO. LTD & ANR. v. M/S L’OREAL INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR.
Delhi High Court held that the phrase 'HAIR SPA' is a generic, descriptive term incapable of exclusive trademark protection and set aside injunction restraining its use alongside the distinctive 'BERINA' mark.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-8 v. S.P. Singla Construction Pvt. Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that additions under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act require incriminating material found during search, and in its absence, additions cannot be sustained in assessments finalized before the search.
Angellina Arenja v. Nitij Arenja
The Delhi High Court directed the Family Court to hear and decide the urgent application on merits, rejecting a hyper-technical maintainability objection.
Star India Pvt Ltd & Anr. v. Moviesghar.art & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunctions and confirmed blocking orders against rogue websites streaming the film 'Bhuj: The Pride of India', directing domain name suspension and upholding Plaintiffs' exclusive copyright rights.
Ram Guru v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of a father for sexual assault on his minor daughter under the POCSO Act, ruling that credible sole testimony of the victim suffices despite minor contradictions and procedural lapses in adducing forensic evidence.
Sidharth Jeitley v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for kidnapping and murder based on a complete chain of circumstantial and forensic evidence, dismissing the appeal.
Humesh @ Babu @ Murari v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and life sentences of appellants for murder under Section 302/34 IPC based on credible eyewitness and forensic evidence despite minor discrepancies.