Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Government of NCT of Delhi v. Krishna Saini
The Supreme Court overruled Pune Municipal Corporation and held that land acquisition proceedings do not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession is taken or compensation is tendered, allowing the Government of NCT of Delhi's appeal.
Government of NCT of Delhi v. Krishna Saini & Ors.
The Supreme Court overruled the High Court's declaration of lapse of land acquisition proceedings under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, clarifying that possession taken or compensation tendered prevents lapse, and upheld the acquisition initiated under the 1894 Act.
Land Acquisition Collector (South), New Delhi and Anr. v. Suresh B. Kapur & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that land acquisition proceedings do not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if either possession is taken or compensation is paid, overruling prior inconsistent decisions and allowing the appeal.
Land Acquisition Collector (South), New Delhi and Anr. v. Suresh B. Kapur & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that land acquisition does not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if either possession is taken or compensation is paid, overruling contrary High Court decisions and clarifying the law in light of Indore Development Authority.
Sunita Devi & Anr. v. The State of Haryana
The Supreme Court allowed pre-arrest bail to appellants cooperating with investigation in a cheating case, setting aside the High Court's refusal of bail.
Sunita Devi & Anr. v. The State of Haryana
The Supreme Court allowed pre-arrest bail to appellants cooperating with investigation in a cheating case, setting aside the High Court's refusal of bail.
Central Bureau of Investigation v. P.S. Jayaprakash; Central Bureau of Investigation v. Dr. Siby Mathews
The Supreme Court set aside the Kerala High Court's anticipatory bail orders in a long-pending espionage-related case, remanding the bail applications for fresh consideration with directions to consider individual roles and the Supreme Court's prior directions.
Central Bureau of Investigation v. P.S. Jayaprakash; Central Bureau of Investigation v. Dr. Siby Mathews
The Supreme Court set aside the Kerala High Court's anticipatory bail orders in a CBI espionage case and remanded the bail applications for fresh consideration based on individual roles and Supreme Court directions.
Pramod Singh Kirar v. State of Madhya Pradesh
The Supreme Court held that a candidate acquitted of a criminal offence and who truthfully discloses the same cannot be denied appointment solely on that ground, restoring his appointment as Police Constable.
Pramod Singh Kirar v. State of Madhya Pradesh
The Supreme Court held that a candidate acquitted in a criminal case and who truthfully disclosed the same cannot be denied appointment solely on that ground, restoring his candidature for Police Constable.
State of Jharkhand v. Linde India Limited
The Supreme Court held that oxygen used as a refining agent in steel manufacture is not a raw material under the Bihar Finance Act, and thus taxable at the standard rate, allowing the State's appeal and setting aside the High Court's contrary order.
Secretary, Government of NCT of Delhi v. Mahipal Singh
The Supreme Court held that land acquisition proceedings do not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession was taken or compensation tendered before the Act's commencement, overruling Pune Municipal Corporation.
Vikram Jamnadas Kothari v. Barclays Wealth Trustees (India) Pvt. Ltd.
The Bombay High Court held that the Section 11 Court's role is limited to prima facie examination of an arbitration agreement's existence and directed reference of disputes under the Escrow Agreement to arbitration, rejecting the Dosti Group's contention of abandonment.
Lt Col Rahul Jain v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that it lacks jurisdiction to entertain writ petitions against final orders of the Armed Forces Tribunal, directing the petitioner to approach the Supreme Court under Section 32 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act.
Umesh Babu v. Jawaharlal Nehru University
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing JNU to relieve the petitioner for deputation, holding that undue delay in disciplinary proceedings and an exonerative inquiry report preclude arbitrary denial of deputation relief.
Khosla Medical Institute v. Delhi Development Authority & Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal setting aside the cancellation of lease by DDA, holding that non-compliance with Section 53B notice was waived after prolonged litigation and that no conclusive evidence proved transfer of property violating lease terms.
Dabur India Limited v. Ashok Kumar and Ors.
Delhi High Court directs domain registrars and banks to enhance verification and compliance mechanisms to protect trademark rights in domain name disputes and mandates government agencies to provide coordinated guidelines.
Indu Rani @Indu Rathi v. Pushpa & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that succession to agricultural land under the Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 prevails over the amended Hindu Succession Act, 2005 where succession crystallized before the amendment, and dismissed the plaintiff's suit for lack of cause of action due to failure to plead existence of coparcenary property.
Harshit Nandrajog & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC following a voluntary and amicable settlement between the parties recorded through mediation.
Mohd. Ajmal v. The State (Govt. of NCT Delhi) & Anr.
Anticipatory bail was denied to the accused in a serious rape and dowry demand case due to the gravity of allegations and need for thorough investigation.