Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
MITC Rolling Mills Private Limited and Anr. v. M/s Renuka Realtors
The Supreme Court held that an order rejecting the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC is a decree and appealable under Section 13(1A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, allowing the appeal and restoring it for merits consideration.
R. Rajendran v. Kamar Nisha
The Supreme Court held that DNA testing cannot be compelled without displacing the statutory presumption of legitimacy under Section 112 of the Evidence Act and emphasized the protection of privacy and bodily autonomy in criminal investigations.
Dr B S Kushwah Institute of Medical Sciences v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Medical Assessment and Rating Board's disapproval of a medical college's application to increase MBBS seats based on biometric attendance data showing gross faculty deficiency, dismissing the writ petition challenging the decision.
The Board of Mumbai Port Authority v. Halani Star & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that the Court has discretion to condone delay in filing additional written statements under Order VIII Rule 9 CPC in commercial suits, allowing a 684-day delayed filing subject to costs.
Lok Everest Co-Op.Hsg. Soc. Ltd. v. Jaydeep Developers
The Court held that the Developer is entitled to complete construction of Wing C[5] as disclosed in the 1993 layout plan and utilize additional FSI arising from change in law without fresh consent, dismissing the Plaintiff’s interim injunction application.
Sahadev Rama Gadling v. Union of India
The Bombay High Court held that in absence of an express order excluding suspension, the suspension period must be counted as qualifying service for pension under Rule 23 of CCS Pension Rules, allowing pension to a compulsorily retired government servant.
Manoj Shankar Deshpande v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court acquitted a public servant accused of accepting bribe where prosecution evidence showed the subsidy was released before the alleged bribe payment, creating reasonable doubt.
Deepak Pandey v. M/S FIITJEE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act after prima facie finding a valid arbitration agreement, limiting judicial scrutiny to existence and leaving arbitrability to the tribunal.
VASU CHEMICALS LLP v. GAIL (INDIA) LIMITED
The Court held that under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, only a prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement is to be examined and appointed a sole arbitrator, leaving limitation and other objections to the arbitral tribunal.
BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD v. UTTEZ DIGITAL INDIA PVT. LTD
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, the Court's role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed an arbitrator accordingly, leaving substantive disputes to arbitration.
S.H. Associates India Pvt. Ltd. v. Bhambri Solar Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court limited its inquiry under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act to a prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed a sole arbitrator to resolve the contractual disputes.
Anil Kumar Upadhaya v. UOI and Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition challenging the conviction under the Border Security Force Act and IPC, holding that no error apparent on the face of the record justified review.
Jeetu Singh Chauhan v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that a candidate honourably acquitted on merits cannot be denied appointment in the SSB on grounds of prior judicial custody or alleged involvement in a criminal case, and quashed the cancellation of his appointment for violating natural justice and constitutional principles.
Union of India v. 672796 HFO Banshidhar Gairola
The High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that disabilities not recorded at entry are service-related unless rebutted by the employer.
Global Tech Fab v. Government of NCT Delhi & Anr
Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file an appeal without further pre-deposit, set aside provisional attachment, and deferred the validity of CGST notifications pending Supreme Court ruling.
Reetika v. Rajinder Kumar Jindal & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's limited visitation rights granted to grandparents and financial safeguarding directions for the minor child, dismissing the mother's appeal for interference.
Ram Ashish v. The Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration without prior notice and reasoned order is impermissible and directed cancellation to be effective only from the date of the Show Cause Notice, while ordering disposal of the pending appeal with a personal hearing.
Metallicz Media Private Limited v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court remanded a GST adjudication matter for fresh hearing after holding that the petitioner was denied natural justice, while leaving the validity of the impugned notifications pending before the Supreme Court.
Sunil Kumar Gupta v. Commissioner of Customs
The Delhi High Court held that failure to issue a Show Cause Notice within the statutory period under Section 110 of the Customs Act mandates unconditional release of seized goods without penalty.
M/S Stalwart India Alloys Limited v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the retrospective cancellation of GST registration for lack of procedural fairness and directed a fresh hearing after re-inspection, reaffirming that retrospective cancellation is impermissible without explicit notice.