Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Harsh Vibhore Singhal v. The Cabinet Secretary, Government of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Government's policy permitting Sikh passengers to carry Kirpans on domestic flights, holding that it is a constitutionally protected religious freedom and not subject to judicial interference absent fundamental rights violation.
Biogenetic Drugs Pvt. Ltd. v. Central Medical Services Society & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of a tender bid for non-compliance with eligibility criteria, emphasizing limited judicial interference in expert technical evaluations in public procurement.
Anil Kumar v. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence
The Delhi High Court granted bail to an undertrial accused held for over eight years in a commercial quantity NDPS case, emphasizing the constitutional right to speedy trial and personal liberty despite statutory bail restrictions.
Dynamic Drilling and Services Private Limited v. Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging disqualification of a damaged rig's bid in a government tender, holding that judicial interference in tender decisions is limited and the rejection was neither arbitrary nor mala fide.
Asian Hotels (North) Ltd v. Sital Dass Sons & Anr.
Delhi High Court allowed appellant's appeal to carry out urgent repairs of licensed premises during arbitration, modifying the Arbitral Tribunal's order and protecting appellant's possession rights.
Deepjot Singh Anand v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that Section 100A of the CPC bars a second Letters Patent Appeal against a Single Judge's judgment in a Land Acquisition reference, rendering the present appeal not maintainable.
Mr. Asit Ahmed Advocate v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court directed government funding and support for indigenous rare disease therapies, mandated free treatment for patients, and emphasized CSR facilitation and crowdfunding publicity to address treatment accessibility.
Peeyush Aggarwal v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR against a petitioner who was a bona fide purchaser and victim of property fraud, holding that no criminal offence was made out against him.
Transasia Private Capital Limited & Anr. v. Parmanand Agarwal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed defendant no.2's application to set aside a summary suit decree, holding that absence of original documents in electronic filing and failure to show special circumstances disentitle relief under Order XXXVII Rule 4 CPC.
Chander Shekher Neerav v. Kanika Chanana
The Delhi High Court disposed of the appeal by permitting the mother to travel abroad with the child for professional reasons subject to mutually agreed visitation and custody terms ensuring the child's welfare and parental access.
VA Tech Wabag Limited v. Delhi Jal Board
The Delhi High Court upheld the three-year blacklisting of VA Tech Wabag Limited by Delhi Jal Board for contractual and environmental deficiencies, holding that due process and natural justice were duly followed.
Smt. Kasturi & Ors. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal holding that the deceased was a bona fide passenger who died in an untoward train accident, remanding the matter for compensation and condoning delay in filing the appeal.
Aftab Alam v. Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board
The Delhi High Court upheld DUSIB’s rejection of slum dwellers’ rehabilitation claim for failing to prove possession before 2006 and clarified that “nearby areas” means contiguous or adjacent clusters only.
Suchit Prasad Jain v. Neeraj Puri
The Delhi High Court modified an order directing deposit of rent arrears by the petitioner, allowing deposit at a higher quantum with withdrawal rights limited to agreed rent, pending final trial.
Himani Malhotra v. Indraprastha College of Women and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to expedite constitution of the Appeal Committee and process subsistence allowance for a terminated teacher during the pendency of her appeal under Ordinance XII-A.
Bennett Coleman & Co. Ltd v. MAD (India) Pvt. Ltd
The Bombay High Court held that an arbitration clause printed on the back of tax invoices, accepted and acted upon by the parties, constitutes a valid arbitration agreement warranting appointment of a sole arbitrator.
Namrata Avinash Kadu v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
The Bombay High Court quashed a preventive detention order for failure to place the anticipatory bail order before the detaining authority and supply it to the detenu, violating Article 22(5) rights and vitiating subjective satisfaction.
State of Maharashtra and Ors. v. Prabhakar Rangnath Kulkarni and Ors.
The High Court held that Civil Courts have jurisdiction to entertain suits challenging land acquisition where mandatory procedural requirements under the special resettlement statute are not complied with, and dismissed the revision application against the Trial Court's order upholding such jurisdiction.
IFFCO Tokio General Insurance Company Ltd. v. Namrata Namdeo Vishe & Ors.
The Bombay High Court dismissed the insurer's appeal, holding that insurers must indemnify third-party victims despite invalid driver licenses but may recover the amount from the insured under the 'pay and recover' doctrine.
DLF LTD. v. IL&FS ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking appointment of an arbitrator against IL&FS group companies, holding that the NCLAT moratorium under Sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act bars arbitration proceedings during the resolution process.