Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Sunder Kukreja v. The State
The Delhi High Court upheld the framing of charges under Sections 354, 354D, and 506 IPC against the petitioner, dismissing his petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing the FIR and charge framing orders.
Sunder Kukreja v. The State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of FIR and charge framing under Sections 354, 354D, and 506 IPC, holding that prima facie offences are made out and no exceptional circumstances exist to interfere under Section 482 CrPC.
IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. MUNNA KUMAR & ORS
The Delhi High Court held that an insurer who fails to prove timely communication of policy cancellation to the RTO remains liable to pay compensation to the claimant and may recover it from the vehicle owner and driver.
Sunil Podar v. The National Trust for Welfare of Person with Autism, Cerebral Palsy, Mental Retardation and Multiple Disabilities and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of citizenship restrictions in the National Trust Rules and Regulations for appointment of guardians of persons with disabilities, holding such delegated legislation intra vires the parent Act and consistent with the State's parens patriae obligation.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 v. Green Mark Infra Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's power under Section 254(2) and Rule 25 to recall an ex parte order passed on merits due to non-receipt of notice, emphasizing the right to a fair hearing and the Tribunal's power to rectify its mistakes.
Shatrughan Shahi v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of FIR alleging investment fraud, holding that the allegations disclose cognizable offences and the case must proceed to trial.
Shabnam v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging anticipatory bail granted to the accused, holding that bail orders cannot be set aside on irrelevant grounds or without compelling reasons.
Prajol Biswal and Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce proceedings.
Central Public Information Officer, Employees Provident Fund Organisation v. Alok Dutta Jha
The Delhi High Court held that information relating to an employee's vigilance clearance and disciplinary records is personal information exempt under Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act, and the CIC's order directing disclosure was set aside.
Mohd Mubasshir Badar Khan v. Jamia Millia Islamia
The Delhi High Court set aside university orders imposing campus ban and cancelling admission for failure to provide the petitioner an opportunity of hearing, emphasizing adherence to natural justice.
J. B. Chemicals and Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. OKVIK Lifesciences and Anr.
The Delhi High Court recorded and decreed a settlement resolving a trademark infringement dispute where the defendant acknowledged the plaintiff's trademark rights and agreed to cease infringing activities and pay damages.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -7 v. R.K Jain Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revenue's appeal, holding that the PCIT's revision under Section 263 was unjustified as the AO's assessment was neither erroneous nor prejudicial given the substantiated job work expenses.
Arjun & Anr. v. State
The Delhi High Court modified the sentence of appellants convicted for assaulting a police officer by releasing them on time served and imposing an additional fine, considering prolonged trial duration and family circumstances.
Suresh Babu v. State
The Delhi High Court modified the appellant's sentence by releasing him on the period already served and imposing an additional fine, considering his prolonged incarceration and family responsibilities.
Ajit Sarkar v. Chairman, Managing Committee, Air Force Schools/Air Force Golden Jubilee Institute & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that compulsory retirement imposed as a penalty on a teacher of a recognized private school is a major penalty challengeable only before the Delhi School Tribunal under Section 8(3) of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973, and not by way of a writ petition.
Vineet Jhavar v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of an accused involved in a large-scale cyber extortion racket, emphasizing the gravity of cybercrimes and the need to deny bail during ongoing investigation where the accused absconded.
The New India Assurance Company Ltd v. Kamla Devi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a driver’s murder during the course of employment establishes proximate cause for compensation liability under the Employees’ Compensation Act, and insurer’s denial based on alleged fake license fails if employer exercised due care.
State v. Bijinder Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of a public servant accused of bribery, holding that mere recovery of tainted money without proof of demand or voluntary acceptance is insufficient for conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act.
FLG Offr Deepak Gupta Retd v. Union of India and Others
The Delhi High Court directed the petitioner to first make a representation against the impugned medical certificate and disposed of the writ petition without issuing writs, emphasizing exhaustion of administrative remedies before judicial intervention.
Moinuddin v. Waseem Ahmed and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition upholding the trial court’s dismissal of a possession suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act for being barred by limitation due to failure to prove dispossession within six months.