Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Mukesh Rajora v. Pension Trust & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the Pension Trust is liable to pay pension and terminal benefits to employees who opted for voluntary retirement under Rule 48A after transfer from DVB to DISCOMs, directing release of dues withheld since 2020.
Harmeet Singh v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that simultaneous disciplinary proceedings and inquiry for the same allegations are impermissible and directed termination of the inquiry while allowing continuation of disciplinary proceedings with amended charge-sheet if necessary.
Ashok & Ors. v. Khyali Ram & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Executing Court's order issuing warrants of possession in execution of a permanent injunction decree, affirming that such execution under Order XXI Rule 32(5) CPC applies to both prohibitory and mandatory injunctions and rejecting fraud allegations lacking particulars.
versus
The Delhi High Court held that the Trial Court erred in refusing to take on record a written statement filed within the Supreme Court’s extended limitation period and directed the Trial Court to proceed accordingly.
Suresh Kumar Rathee v. The Registrar Co Operative Group Housing Societies Parliament Street Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that in absence of an appeal under the Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, a speaking order by the Registrar can be challenged by filing a revision petition under Section 116 before the Financial Commissioner, and dismissed the writ petition accordingly.
Rita Saxena v. Center for Railway Information Systems
The Delhi High Court reviewed and set aside the reduction of performance appraisal marks due to arbitrariness and lack of communication, directing reconsideration of grading in favor of the petitioner.
Mohsin Akhtar and Anr. v. ICICI Bank and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that recovery proceedings must first be pursued against the property developer and landowner before proceeding against allottees, dismissing the petition challenging premature recovery action.
Vineet Gupta v. Reserve Bank of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition concerning double allotment of a flat, directing parties to seek remedies before the NCLT as per the DRT recovery order.
Nirmal Chandra Mandal v. DG CISF
The Delhi High Court directed the CISF to decide the petitioner's pending representation against his transfer within a stipulated time, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.
Department of Transport, GNCTD v. Star Bus Services Pvt Ltd
Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award against the Department of Transport, GNCTD, dismissing challenges of fraud and delay, affirming limited court interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
Hridesh Kumar Pathak v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that recovery proceedings against the petitioner cannot proceed until recovery against other defendants is exhausted, and refused to stay the proceedings but protected the petitioner's rights pending further remedies.
M/S MN AUTOMOBILE PRIVATE LIMITED v. GURIQBAL SINGH & ANR.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to condone delay in filing the written statement under the Commercial Courts Act, emphasizing adjudication on merits over procedural technicalities.
Mohit Bhanot v. Anupam Batura
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to examine witnesses as per an amended list despite non-payment of costs due to COVID-19 delays, imposing compensatory costs on the petitioner to protect the respondent's interests.
Meet Malhotra v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that members of rifle clubs may only temporarily use a third firearm for target practice under license and must not possess more than two firearms, dismissing a review petition challenging this interpretation.
Davinder Kaur v. Union of India & Ors.
Delhi High Court allowed a petitioner declared unfit due to tattoo to undergo fresh medical examination before a newly constituted Medical Board, with the Board's final decision being binding.
Vijay Pratap Singh Chauhan v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed respondents to decide the petitioner’s pending representation for promotion within four weeks and restrained any promotion until such decision is communicated.
Ram Naresh Maurya v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the Municipal Corporation of Delhi to permit street vendors holding valid certificates to continue vending within their designated zones in compliance with prescribed conditions under the Street Vendors Act, 2014.
AB v. CD
The Delhi High Court accepted the parties' settlement in family law appeals, allowed withdrawal of appeals, ordered disbursement of funds, and imposed confidentiality and privacy protections.
Shajan Jacob v. Reserve Bank of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the procedural safeguards in DRT recovery proceedings, dismissing the petition while allowing the petitioner to pursue remedies and requiring exhaustion of recovery steps before payment enforcement.
Pratibha Vats v. Vivek Kaushik
The Delhi High Court set aside a contested divorce decree upon amicable settlement and allowed amendment of the petition to divorce by mutual consent with waiver of the statutory waiting period.