Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Arcelormittal India Pvt Ltd v. JSC OGCC Kazstroyservice
The Delhi High Court granted an ex parte decree in favor of the plaintiff for recovery under a corporate guarantee, affirming jurisdiction, limitation, and non-enforceability of foreign interim orders.
Raj Kumari v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors
The Delhi High Court directed the Municipal Corporation of Delhi to allow a street vendor to vend peacefully at her designated site strictly in accordance with her valid Certificate of Vending and its terms.
D. B. Madan v. Punjab National Bank
The Delhi High Court held that an employee acquitted after full trial and whose departmental charge sheet was quashed is entitled to full pay and pension benefits for the suspension period, overruling the bank's denial based on 'benefit of doubt' acquittal.
Rajvir Singh v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed issuance of Vigilance Clearance to an AIS officer pending an inconclusive Preliminary Enquiry, enabling him to attend an international certification course.
Yash Mehta & Anr. v. Yash Pal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal seeking a restraint order in a specific performance suit, holding that the appellants failed to establish a prima facie case due to cancellation of the collaboration agreement and lack of possession.
Daeyoung Jung v. Bar Council of India
Delhi High Court held that a duly qualified foreign national from a country permitting Indian citizens to practice law is entitled to enrolment as an advocate under Section 24(1)(a) of the Advocates Act, 1961, and Bar Council of India cannot refuse enrolment on extraneous grounds.
Akhand Prakash Shahi v. DG BSF & Anr.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the petition challenging a suspension order by directing the respondents to communicate the confirmation in writing and advised the petitioner to seek remedy before the appropriate forum.
Shiv Shanker v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed a writ petition directing the Municipal Corporation of Delhi to permit the petitioner to vend within the permitted zone strictly in accordance with the terms of his Certificate of Vending under the Street Vendors Act, 2014.
Gopal Johari v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition invoking Section 423 IPC for fraudulent execution of a deed, holding the dispute to be civil in nature with no criminal offence made out and upholding concurrent findings of the lower courts.
Gilead Sciences Ireland Uc v. Gopal Agrawal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and costs to the plaintiff for trademark infringement and passing off against defendants using a deceptively similar mark 'HARVOBAY' to the registered trademark 'HARVONI'.
India Skills Pvt. Ltd. v. Neeraj Kumar Pathak & Manoj Kumar
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal in a defamation suit, holding that statements asserting outstanding dues were not false or defamatory as the appellant failed to prove the falsity of such claims.
M/S. SIMPLEX INFRASTRUCTURES LIMITED v. NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking injunction against termination of an infrastructure contract and invocation of bank guarantees, holding that injunctions in such contracts causing delay are barred under Section 20A of the Specific Relief Act.
Ajeet Kumar and Ors. v. Guru Harkrishan Public School Kalkaiji Branch and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed an unaided minority school to implement 6th and 7th Pay Commission pay revisions with arrears and interest, affirming employees' entitlement to pay parity with government school employees under the Delhi School Education Act.
Gorakhnath Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to treat the writ petition as a representation under the MACP Scheme and decide it within eight weeks, allowing further challenge if aggrieved.
Ramesh Manglani v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner accused of money laundering under PMLA, holding that on prima facie assessment he lacked control and mens rea, and emphasizing the application of twin conditions for bail under section 45 of the PMLA.
BENTLEY SYSTEMS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 13(2)(1), MUMBAI & ANR
The Delhi High Court set aside reassessment notices issued to a merged entity and allowed the Assessing Officer to recommence proceedings by issuing fresh notices to the amalgamated company in accordance with law.
Tofik & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC based on an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
HALDIRAM INDIA PVT. LTD v. M/S KRISHNASHREE FOODS & ORS.
The Delhi High Court decreed the suit based on a lawful settlement wherein defendants admitted plaintiff's trademark and copyright ownership and undertook to cease infringement, granting permanent injunction and binding the parties to the settlement terms.
Rajeev Sharma v. Deepti Sharma
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte divorce decree and allowed the parties to proceed with a mutual consent divorce based on a comprehensive settlement covering custody and property division.
Praefinium India Opportunities F Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle International Taxation 2 (2) (2) New Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside the AO's order under Section 148A(d) for failure to consider the assessee's reply and directed fresh proceedings ensuring procedural fairness.