Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Sandeep alias Baba alias Imran v. State
The Delhi High Court acquitted appellants in a murder case due to failure of prosecution to conclusively prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt in a circumstantial evidence case.
Bablu v. State NCT of Delhi
Delhi High Court modified appellants' conviction from murder under Section 302 IPC to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part II IPC, holding that the assault was in heat of passion without premeditation.
Navi v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction for murder based on the appellant's conduct, forensic DNA evidence, and post mortem report, dismissing the appeal challenging the admissibility of confession and forensic evidence.
Liyakat Ali v. The State of NCT Delhi
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of murder and related charges due to insufficient and inconclusive circumstantial and DNA evidence, emphasizing the need for conclusive proof beyond reasonable doubt.
Narender v. State
Delhi High Court upheld convictions of four appellants for murder based on credible eyewitness and forensic evidence but acquitted one appellant due to identity doubts.
Madhu Bala v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the murder conviction of Madhu Bala, ruling that appeals by accused persons of unsound mind must be postponed until fitness to defend is established, and affirmed the admissibility of dying declarations recorded by police.
Jagdish v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for murder based on circumstantial and DNA evidence, emphasizing the accused's failure to discharge the burden under Section 106 of the Indian Evidence Act.
Jitender alias Vikash alias Allu v. The State of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction based on a voluntary and truthful dying declaration recorded by police in presence of a doctor, affirming that such declaration can be sole basis for murder conviction under Section 302 IPC.
Nikhil Rana v. State
The Delhi High Court set aside the murder conviction of Nikhil Rana due to incomplete circumstantial evidence and unreliable ballistic and mobile phone data, dismissing conspiracy charges against all accused.
Sandeep @ Sandy v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and life sentences of six appellants for the murder of ASI Jogender and Munesh, affirming the sufficiency of circumstantial evidence including CCTV identification and recovery of weapons.
Anil Kumar v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal upholding the appellant's conviction for murder and related offences based on credible CCTV evidence, forensic reports, and admissions under Section 313 Cr.P.C.
Umakant alias Anil Kumar v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the murder conviction of appellant Umakant based on circumstantial evidence and modified the sentence of co-accused Sumit Kumar, affirming that absence of direct cause of death or corpus delicti does not preclude conviction when the chain of circumstances is complete.
Raj Kumar & Anr. v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of appellants for rape and related offences based on the credible sole testimony of the prosecutrix despite absence of DNA corroboration, modifying the sentence for rape from 30 to 20 years imprisonment.
Aman @ Sonu v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the convictions of appellants for gang rape under Sections 366/34 IPC and 376-D IPC, relying on consistent prosecutrix testimony, DNA and call records, while modifying life sentence to life imprisonment.
Pradeep Kumar v. State of U.P
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions of police officers for custodial death of a detainee, rejecting the suicide theory and emphasizing the importance of forensic evidence and police record scrutiny in custodial death cases.
Parveen Rana v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC based on a complete chain of circumstantial evidence including extra-judicial confession, voice analysis, and recovery of weapon, while modifying the sentence in default of fine.
Satender Solanki v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court set aside the appellant's conviction for murder due to unreliable eyewitness testimony, investigative lapses, and procedural irregularities, acquitting him for lack of proof beyond reasonable doubt.
Sandeep Kumar v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant in a dowry death case due to failure of prosecution to prove dowry demand and cruelty beyond reasonable doubt and successful rebuttal of statutory presumption.
Pawan Kumar v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the murder conviction of appellant Pawan Kumar based on reliable child witness testimony and forensic evidence, while acquitting co-appellants for lack of sufficient proof.
Dilip Mishra v. State
Delhi High Court upheld convictions of appellants for murder and related offences based on credible eyewitness, medical, and forensic evidence establishing their participation in an unlawful assembly.