Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. SHYAM SUNDER & ORS
The Delhi High Court upheld the claimant's income based on bill books, reduced future prospects to 40%, and rejected disability enhancement without cross-appeal in a motor accident compensation appeal.
Susheel Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging disqualification from CISF recruitment for lacking a valid driving license for a motorcycle with gear, affirming strict adherence to prescribed eligibility criteria.
State v. Munesh Pal
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal seeking reimbursement of prosecution expenses from an economically disadvantaged accused, upholding the trial court's order awarding victim compensation and sentence after considering the victim impact report.
Kamlesh Kumar v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court converted the petitioner’s medical invalidation into compulsory retirement due to denial of review medical examination and procedural unfairness, granting pension and benefits.
Ranjeet Singh v. The State and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Lok Chand alias Lokesh v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a 16-year-old FIR for loan default after full repayment and No Dues Certificates, imposing social service conditions for misuse of the criminal justice system.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 v. N. S. Software
The Delhi High Court held that once commercial expediency of a loan is established, interest paid is allowable without repeated demonstration, and disallowance on diversion of funds as interest-free advances to partners is unjustified if revenue neutrality applies.
Puja Gulati v. Col Arun Gulati
The Delhi High Court directed completion of cross-examination before the Local Commissioner within a fixed timeframe, balancing procedural efficiency and fairness in divorce proceedings.
Pfizer Inc & Ors. v. West-Coast Pharmaceutical Works Limited
The Delhi High Court granted a permanent injunction restraining the defendant from manufacturing or selling patented Crizotinib products based on the defendant's undertaking and absence of infringement, while dismissing jurisdictional objections.
Anuj Sharma v. Amit Sharma
The High Court upheld that documents like GPA and Agreement to Sell do not transfer ownership but create possessory rights entitling the Plaintiff to maintain a suit for mandatory injunction against a licensee, and dismissed the revision petition challenging rejection of plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.
Prashan Kumar v. Union of India and Others
The Delhi High Court quashed the medical board’s rejection of a candidate for recruitment due to non-compliance with prescribed medical examination guidelines and directed a fresh examination.
Amit Kumar & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that police must register FIRs and conduct proper investigations into the suspicious deaths of two IIT Delhi students alleging caste-based atrocities, setting aside the High Court's refusal to direct FIR registration.
Suchinder Kumari Bhola v. Pawan Kumar Babbar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of connected appeals by allowing withdrawal and enforcing a mediated settlement involving property transfer and compounding of offences.
New Hanuman Nagar SRA Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. v. Apex Grievance Redressal Committee
The Bombay High Court upheld the reinstatement of the Developer in a slum rehabilitation scheme, holding that non-procurement of NOC did not invalidate the scheme and that the Petitioner Society lacked locus and had not exhausted statutory remedies.
Yashwant Govind Sakhare & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that failure to acquire land reserved under a town planning scheme within statutory timelines under Section 127 of the MRTP Act results in automatic lapsing of the reservation and directed the State to release the land accordingly.
Chitra Sonawane v. Thane Municipal Corporation
The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition by minority society members challenging redevelopment approvals, holding that the majority's consent governs redevelopment and that the amended UDCPR 2020 provisions do not apply retrospectively.
Satish v. New Delhi Municipal Council & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed a writ petition permitting the legal heir of a deceased vendor to approach the Town Vending Committee for substitution of the vendor's name in the municipal vendor list.
Nisar Ahmed v. Agya Pal Singh
The Delhi High Court allowed the landlord’s eviction petition for bonafide requirement of Wakf property premises by himself and dependent married daughters, holding the petition maintainable before civil courts despite the Wakf Act and emphasizing that financial status is irrelevant to bonafide need.
Anil Goel and Ors. v. State and Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 406, 420, and 120-B IPC based on a complete settlement between private parties, directing the petitioners to plant trees as a restorative condition.
Rajkumar & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 506, 509, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes upon the parties' voluntary amicable settlement, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.