Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Dhiraj Sahni v. Rishi Anand
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal upholding the trial court's order striking off the appellant's written statement under Order XIII-A CPC due to procedural defaults and non-appearance.
Nirmala Singh v. High Court of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking re-evaluation of judicial service exam answer sheets, holding that explicit rules prohibiting re-evaluation bar judicial interference absent patent error.
Smt. Rajbala & Ors. v. Sh. Krishan Kumar Sharma & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the latest Income Tax Return filed before the accident should ordinarily be the basis for determining compensation in motor accident claims, setting aside the Tribunal's averaging of multiple years' ITRs.
Shri Ram General Insurance Company Ltd v. Baby Khushi
The Delhi High Court upheld the MACT award holding the truck driver liable for rash and negligent driving causing injury, rejecting contributory negligence based solely on the Scooty driver's lack of license.
Umrao Rawat v. Union of India and Anr
Delhi High Court allowed a petition directing grant of invalid pension to a constable invalided due to psychiatric illness attributable to military service despite less than 10 years of qualifying service.
Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) Delhi v. M/S Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences
The Delhi High Court upheld that interest earned on government grants must be included in determining substantial government financing for exemption under Section 10(23C)(iiiac) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
New Era Cap Co. Inc. v. M/S Galaxy Caps
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to New Era Cap Co. Inc. against Galaxy Caps for unauthorized use of the 'NEW ERA' trademark and logos, ordering destruction of infringing goods.
Pritee @ Pitambari Devi & Anr. v. Shashi Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the MACT's dismissal of a motor accident claim due to failure to prove the involvement of the insured vehicle in the accident.
Rajkumar Gupta v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of the accused in a serious sexual offence case, relying on victim identification during TIP and DNA evidence linking him to the crime, despite his absence in the FIR and initial statements.
Ashish Kundra and Anr v. A.B. Grain Spirits Pvt. Ltd and Ors
The Delhi High Court disposed of contempt appeals on the basis of a settlement and assurance of payment, setting aside the contempt order subject to compliance.
Ajit Kumar and Others v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Municipal Corporation of Delhi to allow duly licensed street vendors to vend peacefully within their zones strictly in accordance with their Certificates of Vending and applicable laws.
Subhash Mendiratta v. Sureshb Mendiratta
The Delhi High Court held that a suit cannot be dismissed under Order XII Rule 6 CPC solely on the basis of a DNA report without formal expert evidence and trial, emphasizing the need for clear admissions before summary judgment.
Verizon Trademark Services LLC & Ors. v. Vikash Kumar
The Delhi High Court declared the trademark VERIZON as a well-known trademark under the Trade Marks Act, 1999, granting it protection in relation to telecommunication services.
Omansh Thakur v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of the 75% Class XII marks eligibility criterion for NIT admissions and dismissed the petition of a candidate who failed to meet this criterion and complete admission formalities.
Kanwal Nain Singh & Ors. v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed two FIRs arising from a private neighbor dispute based on a mutual settlement, subject to conditions including tree plantation to promote social good.
Rajiv Kumar & Ors. v. The State Govt NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes after the parties amicably settled and obtained a mutual consent divorce.
Ravinder Dabas v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging land mutation due to inordinate delay and held that non-substitution of legal representatives of a deceased respondent led to abatement of the appeal in toto.
Union of India v. M/S Parishudh Machines Pvt. Ltd
The Delhi High Court allowed release of the entire deposited arbitral Award amount to the MSME respondent under its inherent powers after dismissal of the challenge petition, subject to security, to prevent undue hardship and ensure justice.
Pradeep Kumar Verma & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act based on an amicable settlement between estranged spouses, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Ragini Sharma v. NCT of Delhi and Another
The Delhi High Court quashed a theft FIR under Section 380 IPC on the ground of an amicable family settlement, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.