Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Sunil Madan Mandhan v. The State GNCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the probate of a Will executed by the Testator, rejecting the appellant's allegations of forgery and undue influence due to lack of credible evidence.
Hitesh Sharma & Anr. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC based on an amicable settlement between estranged spouses, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Surender Basoya v. Sanjeev Joon
The Delhi High Court upheld the cancellation of a Sale Deed due to dishonour of post-dated cheques, affirming the suit as commercial and dismissing the appeal challenging the decree for recovery, possession, and injunction.
M/S Fire Immune Systems v. M/S Elesco Traders Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Commercial Court's decree for possession and mesne profits, holding that a suit instituted by a company Director is maintainable, landlord-tenant relationship was proved, and a fresh suit after return of plaint is permissible when a subsequent cause of action arises.
Sanjay Aggarwal v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that investigation and attachment proceedings under the PMLA are not barred by SFIO jurisdiction under the Companies Act, and a Provisional Attachment Order can be validly issued without a prior chargesheet if supported by sufficient material.
CYBERSEC INFORMATICS v. AVION NETWORK
The High Court allowed the petitioner an opportunity to file a Written Statement to the amended plaint and held that framing additional issues is within the trial court's discretion.
Kanchan Saini & Anr. v. Shiv Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order permitting the respondent to file newly created ownership documents during trial despite delay, dismissing the petitioners' challenge.
Kanika Kandhari v. Rishi Kandhari
The Delhi High Court set aside Family Court orders dismissing restitution petition without evidence and non-quantified maintenance, directing fresh adjudication with proper procedure and quantification.
Jitesh @ Jitu v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail applications of accused involved in heroin trafficking, holding that recoveries from co-accused can be clubbed to attract the statutory bar under Section 37 NDPS Act given the commercial quantity and incriminating material.
Nikita Jain alias Nikki Jain & Anr. v. Ram Phal alias Ram Pal and Anr.
The High Court held that under Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC, only the court may recall witnesses for clarifications and parties cannot summon new witnesses after evidence closure, dismissing the petitioners' application to summon an attesting witness to prove a Will.
The President Indian Association of Private Psychiatry and Ors v. Dr Goutam Saha and Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging an ex-parte injunction as not maintainable but directed the trial court to expedite the hearing of all pending interlocutory applications by pre-poning the scheduled date.
Sunil Nigam @ Sushil Nigam v. Sanjeet Kumar
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file the respondent’s income tax returns as additional documents despite earlier rejection, subject to costs and the respondent’s right to challenge proof.
United Poly Engineering Pvt. Ltd v. Yatra Online Pvt. Ltd
The High Court upheld the trial court’s order permitting examination of a substituted witness with the petitioner’s consent and dismissed the petition challenging refusal to cross-examine the substituted witness.
Rajesh Kumar v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging termination from ITBP service on medical grounds, holding that absence of a Medical Review Board request and finality of statutory appeal upheld the termination order.
Suresh Sahu & Another v. State of Bihar
The Supreme Court acquitted appellants of murder charges due to defective examination under Section 313 CrPC, non-examination of key police witness, and unreliable prosecution evidence.
Milind Vinod Seth v. State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court allowed a petition to correct the petitioner’s name in educational records to match his birth certificate, emphasizing that name changes by choice after school certificates are generally not permitted but relief can be granted on peculiar facts.
Sachin Dattaram Kadam v. State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court quashed the FIR and chargesheet against the applicant, holding that mere presence at the bar without any overt act does not constitute an offence under the Maharashtra Prohibition of Obscene Dance Act and Maharashtra Police Act.
Aniruddha A. Sheth v. Maharashtra State Minority Commission & Paras Subhaschandra Jain
The Bombay High Court held that the Maharashtra State Minority Commission lacked jurisdiction to entertain a commercial dispute complaint and quashed the notices and proceedings initiated by it.
Ganpat Shankar Chougule v. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
The Bombay High Court dismissed appeals by occupants of unauthorized structures on cooperative society land, holding they lacked legal title, suppressed prior litigation, and were not entitled to injunctions against lawful demolition notices under Section 349 of the MMC Act.
Sushil Kumar Jain v. Kiran Chadha
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction of a tenant for non-payment of rent and bona fide requirement by the landlady, holding that the landlord's better title sufficed and the tenant failed to raise a triable issue.