Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Union of India & Ors. v. EX PO LOG SC Manish Kumar Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal’s grant of disability pension for Type II Diabetes Mellitus, holding that the disease was presumed attributable to long military service absent cogent contrary evidence from the medical board.
State v. Vijay Yadav & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside the acquittal under section 308 IPC and convicted the accused under section 323 IPC for causing simple injuries without intention to cause death.
UPL Limited v. The Union of India
The Bombay High Court quashed a 12-year-old show cause notice for service tax due to inordinate and unjustified delay in adjudication, emphasizing strict adherence to statutory timelines and principles of natural justice.
Dhyan Investments & Trading Company Ltd. v. Central Bureau of Investigation
The High Court held that while the petition to quash charges framed is maintainable under Article 226 and Section 482 CrPC due to absence of alternate remedy, the settlement between other parties does not extinguish criminal liability against the petitioners, and thus the criminal proceedings cannot be quashed.
Mohd. Tariq v. State and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from a matrimonial dispute following a genuine and voluntary settlement between the parties, emphasizing the court's power under section 482 CrPC to put an end to such proceedings when no useful purpose would be served.
Amit Guglani & Anr. v. L and T Housing Finance Ltd. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that while disputes under interlinked agreements can be referred to arbitration under the umbrella agreement's clause, failure to issue a mandatory Section 21 notice precludes court intervention under Section 11(6) for appointment of an arbitrator.
Christian Louboutin SAS & Anr. v. M/S The Shoe Boutique – Shutiq
The Delhi High Court granted injunction and damages against a defendant for manufacturing and selling shoes that slavishly imitated the plaintiffs' registered 'RED SOLE' and 'SPIKED SHOE STYLE' designs, emphasizing the unreliability of AI-generated legal evidence.
Swami Vivekanand College of Education v. National Council for Teacher Education
The Delhi High Court held that a final show cause notice under Section 17 of the NCTE Act must be preceded by a show cause notice on the same grounds, and quashed the impugned FSCN issued without prior notice, granting the petitioner time to comply.
Dharambir Rai v. The State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court admitted the appeal against conviction under POCSO and IPC, suspended the sentence pending appeal, and granted bail subject to conditions, emphasizing proper evidence appreciation.
Tej Pal & Ors. v. State of NCT Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce decree, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Kulvinder Singh Gehlot v. Parmila
The Delhi High Court allowed the husband's appeal and granted divorce on grounds of mental cruelty and desertion, holding that long separation and false allegations constitute cruelty under the Hindu Marriage Act.
M/S Valley Iron & Steel Co. Ltd v. Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 5, New Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed the reassessment notice under Section 148 for AY 2011-12, holding that the AO lacked valid reasons to believe that income had escaped assessment, and the reopening amounted to impermissible change of opinion.
Rajni Nagpal v. Reeta Bhayana
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner’s appeal under Article 227, setting aside the trial court’s closure of evidence due to a witness’s judicial custody, and granted further opportunity subject to conditions including payment of costs.
M/S. RSPL Health Private Limited v. Reckitt and Colman (Overseas) Hygiene Home Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking removal of the “HARPIC DRAINXPERT” trademark, holding no confusing similarity or bad faith existed under Section 11(1)(b) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
The New India Assurance Company Ltd v. Lalita Devi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the motor accident compensation award, affirming insurance liability despite challenges to the driver's license and rejecting contributory negligence claims.
M/S GM Modular Pvt Ltd v. Sh. Gopal Shinghal
The Delhi High Court cancelled the respondent's trademark 'GMT' for being deceptively similar to the petitioner's prior registered mark 'GM' in Class 9, upholding the petitioner's rights under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
M/S RAMENDER OIL CARRIER v. M/S HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a serving officer's appointment as arbitrator based on the appellant's express written waiver under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration Act and estopped the appellant from belatedly challenging the appointment.
Siddharth Mishra & Ors. v. Union Public Service Commission
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the UPSC's CSAT Paper-II syllabus and qualifying marks, holding that judicial review cannot question the academic wisdom of experts in competitive examinations absent manifest arbitrariness or illegality.
Ankush Rishi v. Sarvesh Kumar & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's condonation of delay in filing written statement but granted the petitioner a four-week extension to file replication and affidavit to ensure fair trial.
Parveen Kumar v. Som Dutt Sharma
The High Court upheld the trial court's dismissal of the petitioner's application to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, affirming that triable issues requiring evidence cannot be decided at the threshold and revisional jurisdiction under Section 115 CPC is limited to jurisdictional errors.