Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Dinesh Chand Jain v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging cancellation of allotment and eviction orders for unauthorized transfer of a licensed government property, upholding the validity of such cancellation under the DUSIB Act.
Saurav Chaudhary v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the patent agent to explain the abandonment of a patent application due to non-response to the First Examination Report and called for regulatory measures over patent agents, while considering restoration of the application.
Sitesh Kumar Mishra v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed a fresh medical review to determine if the petitioner’s congenital condition of dextrocardia impedes his ability to perform duties before declaring him medically unfit for promotion.
Union of India v. Shobhana Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal’s order directing backdated promotion and seniority from the date of departmental exam result for eligible candidates where initial vacancy calculation was erroneous.
Navpreet Singh v. State Through SHO
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a financial fraud case after considering the completion of investigation, chargesheet filing, and compliance with interim bail conditions, emphasizing that economic offences require case-specific bail analysis.
Sumer v. National Ins Co Ltd
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by assessing permanent disability at 100%, fixing income at actual salary, and increasing attendant and non-pecuniary damages based on medical evidence and Supreme Court precedents.
Silvermaple Healthcare Services Private Limited and Others v. Dr Ajay Dubey & Ors.
The Delhi High Court issued a corrigendum to correct the erroneous date and title of its judgment in CS (COMM) 570/2023, ensuring the record accurately reflects the judgment dated 28 August 2023.
Miloni Shah Nee Ramesh Vora v. Orbit Developers & Ors.
The Bombay High Court granted a summary decree for recovery of Rs. 2.00 crore with interest against defendants who failed to appear in a suit for refund of amounts paid for a commercial unit.
Hikal Limited v. Paxchem Limited
The Bombay High Court held that failure to serve fresh summons within the stipulated time does not mandate dismissal of a summary suit where the defendant has appeared, been served summons for judgment, and filed a reply.
Ramesh Nanalal Vora v. Orbit Developers & Ors.
The Bombay High Court granted summary judgment in favor of a Chartered Accountant for recovery of Rs. 1.20 crore with interest against developers who failed to appear and perform under a terminated MOU.
Sanjay Krushna Katkar v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.
The Bombay High Court held that appeals against bail orders under Section 14-A of the Atrocities Act lie before a Single Judge and that the Act applies to Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe members irrespective of their State of origin, ensuring pan-India protection against atrocities.
Derha v. Vishal
The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision reducing the appellant's share in Mitakshara coparcenary property to one-sixth, applying Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 and the principle of notional partition.
Pallavi v. Union of India
The Supreme Court held that the 2021 notification restricting OCI cardholders' eligibility for medical seats applies prospectively only, protecting rights of OCI cardholders issued cards before that date and allowing the petitioner to participate in NEET PG counselling as an OCI candidate.
Revanasiddappa v. Mallikarjun
The Supreme Court held that children born of void or voidable Hindu marriages, though conferred legitimacy under Section 16 of the Hindu Marriage Act, have property rights limited to their parents' self-acquired property and do not acquire coparcenary rights in ancestral property.
Harendra Rai v. State of Bihar
The Supreme Court reversed the acquittal, convicted respondent no.2 under Sections 302 and 307 IPC, imposed life imprisonment with fines, and directed compensation to victims' families considering the delay and State's deficient prosecution.
Union of India v. Manjurani Routray
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's invalidation of Rule 4(b) of the Flexible Complementing Scheme rules, holding that a challenge to a rule's validity must be specifically pleaded and relief sought before it can be declared ultra vires.
Satyendra Kumar Bind v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed a procedural application to correct the name of counsel in a prior order, directing issuance of a corrigendum.
The Indian Hume Pipe Co. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax
The Bombay High Court allowed the appeal holding that commission payments made under valid agreements to unrelated agents for services rendered are allowable business expenditure and cannot be partially disallowed without valid evidence.
Vinay B. Poddar v. Jayesh Pandya & Ashok Banwarilal Gupta
The Bombay High Court dismissed review petitions challenging restoration of an appeal, holding that no error apparent on record justified review and upholding the exercise of judicial discretion in condoning delay.
Sandeep Sunil Kumar Lohariya v. State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court upheld the rejection of prosecution's belated application to produce additional evidence under Section 173(8) Cr.P.C., holding that evidence known but omitted from the chargesheet cannot be treated as fresh and allowing it at a late stage prejudices the accused and violates fair trial principles.