Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Orion Security Solutions P. Ltd v. DCIT Circle 19 (1) New Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that tax recovery pending appeal cannot exceed 20% of the crystallized tax demand as per the assessment order, including adjustments for TDS and TCS, and directed refund of excess amounts recovered.
Vikas Gupta v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act following an amicable settlement and mutual divorce between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Shubham Chhillar v. State and Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279, 337, and 338 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties and exercised its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -6 v. Mentor Graphics (India) Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revenue's appeal challenging the Tribunal's exclusion of certain comparables in transfer pricing for AY 2008-09, holding that the Tribunal's factual findings are final and no substantial question of law arises.
Surestha v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court disposed of the anticipatory bail application in a case involving assault on a minor, directing the petitioner to cooperate with investigation and allowing arrest only after four weeks’ notice.
M/S Topline Buildtech Pvt. Ltd & Others v. State and Another
The Delhi High Court upheld the summoning order under Section 138 NI Act, holding that alleged theft and invalidity of cheques are defenses to be examined at trial, not at the cognizance stage.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-7 v. Pepsico India Holding Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that provident fund deposits made on the next working day following a national holiday due date qualify for deduction under the Income Tax Act, but deposits beyond the due date cannot be claimed merely because they precede filing of the return.
M/S Topline Buildtech Pvt. Ltd & Others v. State and Another
The Delhi High Court upheld the summoning order under Section 138 NI Act, holding that defenses regarding stolen cheque and stop payment cannot be adjudicated at the summoning stage and must be raised during trial.
Sh. Mukesh Pal & Anr. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under multiple IPC sections based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Haldiram India Pvt Ltd v. S K Foods and Beverages
The Delhi High Court dismissed the defendant's frivolous application under Section 340 Cr.P.C. alleging fabrication by the plaintiff in civil proceedings, holding that misuse of criminal provisions in civil disputes is an abuse of process.
M/S G.D. GOENKA PVT. LTD. v. SHRI TIKAM CHAND EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST & ANR.
The Delhi High Court appointed an independent sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a MoU, without expressing any opinion on the merits.
Gateway Impex Pvt Ltd v. Tata AIG Life Insurance Co Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award awarding mesne profits at a reasonable rate, refusing to enforce an exorbitant penal rent clause, holding no patent illegality in the Tribunal's contract interpretation.
Glaxo Group Limited and Anr. v. Manoj Kumar Jain and Ors.
The Delhi High Court recorded a settlement in a trademark infringement suit and declared the mark BETNESOL as a well-known mark under the Trade Marks Act, 1999, restraining defendants from using deceptively similar marks.
Kulwant Singh Hazooria v. Harcharan Singh Hazooria
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's decree setting aside two Gift Deeds executed under undue influence by an elderly donor in a fiduciary relationship, ordering partition of the property as per the earlier Will.
Jai Pal v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner is entitled to 3rd MACP from 31.12.2012 applying the correct APAR benchmark and directed the respondents to grant benefits accordingly.
National Restaurant Association of India & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the CCPA's authority to regulate mandatory service charges by hotels and restaurants, directing interim measures to ensure transparency and prevent consumer confusion.
Vishwakant Singh & Anr. v. Sunita Mittal
The High Court set aside the Trial Court’s order closing evidence for non-appearance and allowed the petitioner to complete evidence subject to costs and conditions, as final judgment was not yet pronounced.
M/S TATA IRON & STEEL CO. LTD. v. M/S JHALANI TOOLS INDIA LTD
The Delhi High Court directed the Official Liquidator and EPFO to promptly settle and transparently disburse workmen dues in liquidation proceedings, allowing court fee exemptions during the COVID-19 pandemic subject to payment.
Satender Kumar Paswan & Anr. v. Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition alleging wilful violation of a Tribunal order directing appointment under Scheduled Caste category, holding that the respondents acted in accordance with the law prevailing at the time and that the later judgment has only prospective effect.
Defsys Solutions Private Limited v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that suspension of business dealings under Ministry of Defence Guidelines requires adherence to natural justice principles and cannot be indefinite or arbitrary, even in national security cases.