Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Ajit Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the competent authority to decide the petitioner's pending representation against dismissal within six weeks, without interfering with the dismissal order itself.
Employees State Insurance Corporation v. Inder Dutt Sharma & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order granting notional promotion and consequential benefits to senior employees if their juniors were promoted, dismissing the petition challenging the same.
Lt. Col. B. P. Pathak v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging non-empanelment for promotion in the Indian Army, holding that the selection was based on fair comparative merit without bias.
Santosh v. Rajender
The Delhi High Court disposed of the appeal against dismissal of a contested divorce petition on the basis of a mutual settlement, allowing the parties to file a joint petition for divorce by mutual consent.
Amar Nath v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that a street vendor must vend strictly in accordance with the terms of the Certificate of Vending issued under the Street Vendors Act, 2014, and directed the MCD to permit vending within the designated zone subject to those terms.
Sumitra v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the enquiry report that rejected the claim of bonded labour due to absence of bonded debt or agreement under the Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976.
Pancham Chaurasiya v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the Municipal Corporation of Delhi to permit the petitioner to vend within the specified zone strictly in accordance with the terms of his Certificate of Vending under the Street Vendors Act, 2014.
Noor Jahan and Anr. v. MCD and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the MCD to allow street vendors holding valid certificates to vend peacefully within their zones subject to compliance with certificate terms, while permitting further representation to the Town Vending Committee.
Pappu Sahani v. MCD and Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed a street vendor to vend within his designated zone strictly in accordance with his Certificate of Vending and directed authorities to permit peaceful vending without hindrance.
Sabbir v. Anjuman
The Supreme Court held that a suit for specific performance filed after an inordinate delay without showing readiness and willingness is barred by limitation and dismissed the respondents' suit, restoring the First Appellate Court's decision.
Shirdi Nagar Panchayat v. Kishor Sharad Borawake
The Supreme Court upheld the validity of conditions requiring landowners to surrender amenity space to the Municipal Council under a Government Notification, dismissing delayed challenges by landowners and plot holders.
Balwinder Singh v. Narcotics Control Bureau; Satnam Singh v. Narcotics Control Bureau
The Supreme Court overruled prior precedents to hold that confessional statements recorded under Section 67 of the NDPS Act before NCB officers are inadmissible, acquitting Balwinder Singh while upholding Satnam Singh's conviction based on independent evidence.
Nazar Mohamed Mohaideen S v. Jawaharlal Nehru University and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that JNU must assign a Ph.D supervisor as per its Ordinances and quashed the cancellation of the petitioner’s Ph.D candidature for lack of supervision.
Ocean Seven Buildtech Pvt Ltd v. Sh. Sri Bhagwan
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against an interim arbitral order, allowing full arbitral reconsideration and extending the arbitral mandate without expressing any opinion on merits.
Sri Pubi Lombi v. State of Arunachal Pradesh
The Supreme Court held that judicial interference in government transfer orders is limited to cases of malafide or statutory violation and that transfers based on MLA recommendations do not per se vitiate such orders.
Pawan Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed an application to record the presence of the respondents' advocate omitted in the original judgment by issuing a corrigendum.
Kamla Industrial Park Ltd & Ors. v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that the MCGM cannot impose a regularization penalty on a corporate debtor post-IBC resolution plan approval if such penalty was not claimed during insolvency, emphasizing extinguishment of prior liabilities and municipal inaction.
Kamla Industrial Park Ltd v. Ramchandra Sankpal
The Bombay High Court held that the MCGM cannot impose a regularization penalty on a corporate debtor post-IBC resolution plan approval if the penalty claim was not included in the plan, emphasizing municipal inaction and the 'clean slate' principle under the IBC.
Mustafa Ibrahim Nadiadwala & Ors. v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The Bombay High Court quashed land acquisition proceedings and restored possession of the petitioners' 50% share in the land, relying on the Supreme Court's prior ruling that non-compliance with Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act renders acquisition null and void.
Mahesh Sitaram Raut v. National Investigation Agency & State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court granted bail to the appellant accused under the UAP Act, holding that the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case against him beyond hearsay evidence and prolonged pre-trial detention warranted bail.