Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Ashish Kumar Chauhan v. Commanding Officer
The Supreme Court held that armed forces personnel receiving free medical services are not consumers under the Consumer Protection Act and dismissed the appellant's claim of medical negligence and compensation for HIV infection allegedly contracted via blood transfusion.
Malik Mazhar Sultan v. U P Public Service Commission
The Supreme Court upheld the established practice of judicial recruitment in Haryana through a Selection Committee involving the High Court and Public Service Commission, dismissing the State's attempt to conduct recruitment solely via the Public Service Commission.
Commanding Officer, Railway Protection Special Force, Mumbai v. Bhvanaben Dinshbhai Bhabhor
The Supreme Court held that a Railway Protection Force constable is a 'workman' under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, and that claims under this Act are maintainable despite alternative remedies under the Railways Act, 1989.
Ajeet Gurjar v. State of Madhya Pradesh
The Supreme Court held that a Children's Court must conduct a mandatory inquiry under Section 19(1)(i) of the Juvenile Justice Act before trying a child as an adult, and set aside the trial for non-compliance.
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 14 v. JASJIT SINGH
The Supreme Court held that for persons other than the one searched, the six-year assessment period under Sections 153A and 153C of the Income Tax Act begins from the date the seized materials are received by their Assessing Officer, not the date of the original search.
Rahimal Bathu & Others v. Ashiyal Beevi
The Supreme Court held that revision under Section 115 CPC is not maintainable against an order rejecting review of an appealable decree, and the aggrieved party must file an appeal instead.
Union of India & Ors. v. Major Anish Muralidhar v. LT COL V RAVEENDRAN KUTTY RETD
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming that the burden lies on the employer to prove non-attribution to military service and limiting writ review to errors of law.
Star Health and Allied Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Office of Insurance Ombudsman Mumbai & Goa
The Bombay High Court upheld the Insurance Ombudsman's award directing the insurer to pay a health insurance claim for accident-related disc prolapse surgery, rejecting the insurer's contention of a chronic condition exclusion.
CitiusTech Healthcare Technology Pvt. Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle-1(2)(1)
The Bombay High Court held that reopening of income tax assessment based on a mere change of opinion without failure to disclose material facts is impermissible and quashed the reassessment notices and orders.
Shakuntala Karamveer Sarsath v. Atul Mohite & Ors.
The Bombay High Court dismissed the petition challenging the lawful detention and rehabilitation of a beautician identified as a victim of prostitution, holding no violation of fundamental rights occurred.
Jyoti Sharadchandra Lohokare v. The Managing Committee, Shreeji Ville CHS Ltd. & Ors.
The Bombay High Court upheld the validity of a co-operative housing society's levy of charges for cultural activities approved by its General Body under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act and bye-laws.
Brihan Mumbai Electric Supply and Transport v. BEST Jagrut Kamgar Sanghatana
The Bombay High Court upheld the condonation of nearly six years' delay in filing a labour complaint by casual workers, emphasizing a liberal approach to delay and directing adjudication on merits.
M/S MAXX FOOD ENTERTAINMENT & ANR. v. M/S SAGAR RATNA RESTAURANT PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging the imposition of costs on the petitioner for filing a meritless application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, affirming the mandatory nature of pre-institution mediation under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
LYFT, INC. v. GOER TECHNO INFRA PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and mandatory reliefs to Lyft Inc. against Goer Techno Infra Pvt. Ltd. for trademark infringement and passing off of the mark 'LYFT'.
Raja Ram @ Chota Raja v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed parole to a long-term prisoner despite alleged non-surrender, emphasizing the need to balance reformation and public safety and the absence of proof of intimation about surrender dates.
Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd. v. Nishiland Park Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that Section 340 CrPC proceedings before the DRAT are not maintainable post disposal of appeal and directed expeditious disposal of a long-pending recovery application.
Theobroma Foods Private Limited v. Karan Narula and Ors.
The Delhi High Court decreed a trademark dispute suit based on a court-recorded settlement clarifying use, territorial restrictions, and enforcement rights of the marks "THEOBROMA" and "THEOS" between competing bakery businesses.
D S Cargo Agency v. Commissioner of Customs
The Delhi High Court held that a Customs Broker is not liable for offences committed by importer firms after clearance of goods and set aside the revocation of the broker's license while upholding a penalty.
H-D U. S. A., LLC v. Vijaypal Dhayal Owner/ Proprietor of Red Rose Industries
The Delhi High Court held that a broadly worded power of attorney authorizes filing suit for trademark infringement and granted interim injunction restraining defendant's use of the infringing mark pending suit disposal.
New Bharat Offset Printers & Ors. v. National Council of Educational Research and Training
The Delhi High Court upheld NCERT's tender condition mandating printing machines from the year 2000 or later, ruling it neither arbitrary nor discriminatory, and dismissed the petition challenging it.