Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Shiv Prasad v. Manju
The Delhi High Court dismissed the delayed appeal against a maintenance order and stayed execution of Non-Bailable Warrants pending the appellant's appearance in family court.
Priya Jain v. Usha Jain
The Delhi High Court disposed of appeals by directing production and admission of specified balance sheets in a probate suit, with parties agreeing to no further evidence or applications to ensure expeditious disposal.
Bhagwat Singh v. Delhi Transport Corporation
The Delhi High Court directed the Delhi Transport Corporation to dispose of the petitioner's pending departmental appeal within six weeks, emphasizing timely compliance with Tribunal orders and allowing further legal remedies if aggrieved.
Sh. Jai Pal v. Central Administrative Tribunal
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition to set aside the CAT's dismissal of the review petition and directed reconsideration in light of similarly placed employees' exoneration following a fresh inquiry.
Smt. Tersi & Ors. v. Bharti Axa General Life Insurance Co. Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and refused to condone the delay, holding that the Tribunal lacked territorial jurisdiction and the appeal was barred by limitation.
Shriram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Naushad Naz
The Delhi High Court held that the claimants proved rash and negligent driving causing death, set aside the no-fault compensation award, and remanded the matter for proper determination of compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
Sh. A.K. Buddhist v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court set aside the CAT order and directed the Union of India to grant ad-hoc and regular promotions to eligible junior wireless officers within one week.
Chandeep Singh S Awhney v. Ravinder Kumar Ahuja & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of an impleadment application, holding that the petitioner was neither a necessary nor proper party to a suit for mandatory injunction concerning property possession.
M/S GUFIC BIOSCIENCES LIMITED v. M/S SAARVASRI HERBS PRIVATE LIMITED AND ORS
The Delhi High Court recorded a settlement in a trademark infringement suit as a decree, binding the parties and disposing of the dispute between the plaintiff and Defendant No. 1.
Ruchir Rastogi v. Pankaj Rastogi
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and set aside the High Court's order quashing the FIR, holding that the FIR disclosed prima facie cognizable offences of theft, trespass, and criminal intimidation under IPC and must be investigated and tried.
Paranagouda and Another v. The State of Karnataka and Another
The Supreme Court upheld conviction under Section 498A and Section 306 IPC based on a reliable dying declaration but set aside conviction under Section 304B IPC due to lack of proximate nexus with dowry demand.
Chennai Metro Rail Limited v. M/S Transtonnelstroy
The Supreme Court held that unilateral increase of arbitrators' fees without party consent does not terminate the tribunal's mandate or establish bias warranting removal under Section 14 of the Arbitration Act.
Indrakunwar v. State of Chhattisgarh
The Supreme Court overturned a murder conviction due to insufficient evidence and upheld the fundamental right to privacy and fair trial protections for a woman accused of killing her newborn child.
Central Warehousing Corporation v. Thakur Dwara Kalan Ul-Maruf Baraglan Wala & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that an 8% cumulative annual increase over 11 years is a fair rate for determining just compensation in land acquisition, setting aside a 15% rate awarded by the High Court.
Infrastructure Leasing and Financial Services Ltd. v. HDFC Bank Ltd.
The Supreme Court upheld that lease rental receivables were validly assigned to HDFC, falling outside the asset freeze order against IL&FS, and dismissed IL&FS's appeal challenging the assignment's validity.
Initiatives for Inclusion Foundation v. Union of India
The Supreme Court directed the Union and State Governments to ensure mandatory and effective implementation of the Sexual Harassment at Workplace Act, emphasizing the pivotal role of District Officers and mandating timely appointment, training, and monitoring to uphold women's right to a safe workplace.
Keshav Bhaurao Yeole v. Muralidhar & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that the landlord's heirs are entitled to possession of 8.34 acres under Survey No. 291 based on the landlord's holding not exceeding one economic holding and the termination notice limited to that land, applying Section 33B(5)(b) of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.
Aarif & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan & Anr.
The Supreme Court held that invoking Section 319 Cr.P.C. to add accused requires a stricter prima facie satisfaction based on credible evidence, and set aside orders adding appellants as accused due to insufficient evidence.
Dasanglu Pul v. Lupalum Kri
The Supreme Court held that non-disclosure of deceased spouse's properties in election nomination affidavit is not a substantial defect warranting rejection if the candidate has no claim over such properties, and set aside the High Court's order invalidating the appellant's election.
M.A Biviji v. Sunita
The Supreme Court held that the nasotracheal intubation procedure performed was a medically justified alternative and not negligent, setting aside the compensation awarded for alleged medical negligence.