Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Sanket Satish Patil & Ors. v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The Bombay High Court quashed an FIR under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 based on an amicable settlement and no objection from the complainant, emphasizing the court's power to prevent abuse of process.
State Trading Corporation of India Ltd. v. Ravinder Singh Indersingh Sehgal & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that contractual compensation under Clause 15 does not cap mesne profits, which arise independently from wrongful possession, and upheld mesne profit awards exceeding the contractual sum against State Trading Corporation of India Ltd.
State NCT of Delhi v. Kishan Lal
The High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a rash and negligent driving case due to insufficient prosecution evidence and emphasized the principle of benefit of doubt and appellate restraint in appeals against acquittal.
Axis Finance Limited v. Ankur Nag
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act after prima facie finding of an arbitration agreement, limiting judicial scrutiny to existence and leaving substantive issues to arbitration.
Atul Gandhi v. State Govt of NCT Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR involving non-compoundable offences based on an amicable settlement, applying inherent powers under Section 528 of BNSS while imposing costs on the petitioner.
Axis Finance Limited v. Saurabh Panchal & Dhara Saurabh Panchal
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that the court's role is limited to a prima facie examination of the existence of an arbitration agreement, leaving substantive disputes to arbitration.
CBRE South Asia Pvt. Ltd. v. Sphere Air Residency Maintenance Service Association
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 after prima facie finding an arbitration agreement and held that judicial scrutiny at this stage is limited to existence of the agreement, leaving validity and arbitrability to the arbitral tribunal.
M/S MONEYWISE FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT LTD v. MR. MOHD ASIF PROPRIETOR OF SARA TEXTILES AND ANR
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act upon prima facie satisfaction of the existence of an arbitration agreement, emphasizing limited judicial scrutiny and deferring substantive issues to the arbitral tribunal.
M/S XTRACOVER TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD v. M/S ONSITE PHONES PVT LTD & ORS
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, the court’s role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising from a loan agreement.
Tommy Hilfiger Europe B.V. v. Partha Chatterjee
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to Tommy Hilfiger against a defendant supplying counterfeit goods bearing its registered trademarks, proceeding ex-parte due to defendant's non-appearance.
Kapil Kumar v. Life Insurance Corporation and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction and damages assessed against a tenant under the Public Premises Act, ruling that the quantum of damages based on comparable leases was lawful and not subject to reappraisal at the writ stage.
Darshan Kumar Gupta v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the CAT order on delayed retiral benefits, holding that payment of interest at GPF rates with final settlement precludes entitlement to compound interest at market rates.
Employees State Insurance Corporation v. Uma Aggarwal
The Delhi High Court dismissed ESIC's petition, holding that disciplinary proceedings initiated without prior permission of the competent authority violate Article 311(2) and are invalid.
STAR INXS SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. v. ELECSHINE ENGINEERING PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, the Court’s role is limited to a prima facie examination of the existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising from the Work Order dated 09.02.2024.
Vinod Kumar v. Smt Asha & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that while imputing income for interim maintenance, the Family Court must apply the minimum wages applicable in the husband's State of residence, not the forum State, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration accordingly.
Manju & Anr. v. Krishan Kumar
The Delhi High Court enhanced interim maintenance and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication after finding the Family Court did not adequately consider the respondent's full income including disputed bank account credits.
Umesh Paswan v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for rape and related offences, holding that the victim was a major based on bone ossification tests with margin of error, and that credible victim testimony corroborated by DNA evidence sufficed for conviction despite delay in FIR.
Ram Kishore v. Kanwal Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a plaint cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC on res judicata or factual disputes without proper examination and evidence, setting aside the dismissal and restoring the suit.
P2 & P3 v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Section 498A IPC based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.
Ram Gopal & Ors. v. The State of Govt NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed FIR and proceedings under Sections 498A and 406 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement in a matrimonial dispute, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.