Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Union of India v. Vivek Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing reconsideration of an empanelled officer's promotion to General Manager post after vigilance clearance, emphasizing timely and fair administrative action.
The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax – Central -1(OSD) v. Vishnu Apartments Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the deletion of a Rs. 47.07 crore addition by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ruling that a genuine collaboration agreement accepted and taxed in the recipient's hands cannot be treated as a sham transaction by the Assessing Officer.
POWERGRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED v. SPML INFRA LIMITED
The Delhi High Court held that the mandate of an Arbitral Tribunal cannot be extended after the Award has been delivered under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, dismissing the petition for post-Award extension.
Anish Pramod Patel v. Kiran Jyot Maini
Delhi High Court remanded interim maintenance orders under PWDV Act for fresh adjudication after parties file affidavits of income disclosure, directing interim payment to wife pending fresh decision.
Rajesh Marwah v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's dismissal of a belated application to recall the complainant for cross-examination under Section 311 Cr.P.C., emphasizing that such power must be exercised judiciously and not to cause undue delay.
Somdutt Singh v. NCB
The Delhi High Court granted bail to accused in an NDPS case holding that confessional statements of co-accused are inadmissible against others and Section 37 rigours do not apply without recoveries from the accused.
Azad Singh & Ors. v. Krishna Devi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed second appeals challenging the validity of a registered Will, holding that an unregistered family settlement photocopy was inadmissible and could not override the Will's ownership rights.
Vikas Sharma v. University of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the eighteen-month validity period for recruitment advertisements applies to both Teaching and Non-Teaching posts, and a candidate has no vested right if the recruitment process is not completed within this period, thereby dismissing the appellant's claim for appointment.
Fahad Rahber v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of an FIR under IPC for impersonation and cheating, holding that police discretion in invoking relevant laws during investigation must be respected and quashing at the FIR stage is an exceptional remedy.
Ravinder Kaur v. Rekha Patwa & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to place five sale deeds on record as evidence of alternate accommodation in eviction proceedings without requiring amendment of pleadings, leaving the substantive dispute to the Trial Court.
G.S. Raju v. CBI
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of a public servant for demanding and accepting bribe under the Prevention of Corruption Act, affirming that demand and acceptance can be proved by direct or circumstantial evidence even if the shadow witness turns hostile.
Shaileh Rai v. Surender Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's refusal to recall the complainant witness under Section 311 Cr.P.C. after a four-year delay, emphasizing the discretionary nature of such power and the need to prevent abuse of process.
Mrs. Anita Sachdeva & Ors. v. The State (Govt. of NCT Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted Letters of Administration with Will annexed to the petitioners upon proof of a valid Will and no objection from the sole surviving legal heir.
RSPL Limited & Anr. v. Tata Sons Private Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a trademark infringement and passing off suit by consent, with the defendants agreeing to cease use of contested marks and modify their branding to avoid confusion.
Smt. Rubina & Ors. v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash FIR and criminal proceedings in a kidnapping and sale of a minor child case, holding that such serious offences cannot be compromised away despite parental settlement.
Akbar Ali v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that complaints under Section 138 NI Act cannot be quashed at pre-trial stage on the ground of time barred debt, as enforceability is a trial issue to be decided on evidence.
UMAXE PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED v. AIR FORCE NAVAL HOUSING BOARD
The Delhi High Court set aside arbitral awards on the ground that the arbitrator was ineligible and the petitioner did not waive its right to object despite participating in the arbitration proceedings.
Ram Naresh v. State of U.P.
The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction for murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC, affirming that common intention can be inferred from joint participation in the crime even without prior conspiracy.
Shashikant Sharma v. State of Uttar Pradesh
The Supreme Court quashed the charge under Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST Act for lack of prima facie evidence that the accused knowingly committed a serious IPC offence against a Scheduled Caste member, while upholding other charges and continuing the trial.
THE KOUSHIK MUTUALLY AIDED COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY v. AMEENA BEGUM
The Supreme Court held that a Civil Revision Petition under Section 115 CPC is not maintainable against an order dismissing an application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC to set aside an ex-parte decree, and the correct remedy is an appeal under Order XLIII Rule 1(d) CPC.