Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
MS Sumit Enterprises v. Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Services Tax
The Delhi High Court held that GST registration cancellation with retrospective effect requires objective satisfaction and cannot be mechanical, modifying the cancellation date and upholding rejection of cancellation application due to non-furnishing of required stock details.
Vizien Organics v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed adjudication on disputed valuation of seized goods, allowing the petitioner to respond to the show cause notice and requiring the authority to consider all relevant factors before final determination.
M/S Jagdamba Sales Corporation v. State (GNCT of Delhi) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the blacklisting and forfeiture of security deposit against a contractor for wilful failure to lift mustard de-Oiled cake despite repeated opportunities, rejecting claims of hardship due to demonetization and GST.
Veerendra Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the penalty imposed on an immigration officer for colluding in smuggling, holding that statements under Section 108 of the Customs Act and corroborative evidence suffice to establish guilt.
Haryana Pesticides Manufactures Association v. Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging rejection of pre-grant opposition due to improper service, holding that formal procedure for change of email address was not followed and notices sent to the old email were valid.
Rani @ Manju v. State (Govt.) of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside the Sentence Review Board's rejection of premature release for a life convict, directing reconsideration under the 2004 policy and clarifying that administrative decisions must apply relevant policy factors.
Income Tax Office v. Anil Tuteja & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order returning the complaint for lack of territorial jurisdiction over offences committed outside Delhi, holding that statements recorded in Delhi do not confer jurisdiction over the entire criminal conspiracy.
Abheepsa Gupta & Anr. v. Pooja Sharma Bajaj
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal setting aside the family court's dismissal order and directed transfer of the matter to the civil court upon respondent's application to ensure proper jurisdiction and expedition.
Sanjana Sharma v. Central Industrial Security Force
The Delhi High Court upheld the CISF sports policy eligibility criteria restricting NOC for sports coaching courses to personnel appointed under Sports Quota with international experience, dismissing the petitioner's challenge as an impermissible interference in policy.
Arun Kumar Goenka v. Central Bureau of Investigation
The Delhi High Court held that an accused has a constitutional right to access unrelied documents in possession of the investigating agency to ensure a fair trial, directing the CBI to supply certain withheld documents and mandating judicial scrutiny of confidentiality claims.
Kuldeep Sirohi v. Bureau of Indian Standards
The Delhi High Court held that ACRs for the period covered by retrospective in-situ promotions must be considered for subsequent promotions, directing the respondent to grant consequential benefits accordingly.
Afzal Khan v. Golf Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court transferred a nascent winding up petition under the Companies Act, 1956 to the NCLT, holding that such proceedings pending before High Courts must be transferred to the NCLT under the Companies Act, 2013 and Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Kaum Faqeer Shah v. Ministry of Labour and Employment
Delhi High Court directs time-bound recovery of backwages and immediate financial assistance to rescued child bonded labourers under statutory schemes with an accountability mechanism.
Himanshu Chopra v. M/S Equitas Small Finance Bank Ltd.
The Delhi High Court quashed proceedings against a former director in a cheque dishonour case, holding that liability under Section 138/141 NI Act does not extend to directors who resigned prior to the offence.
Upendra Kumar and Others v. Union of India and Others
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the CRPF's LDCE-HC/GD-2023 examination, holding that the respondents adequately addressed errors and that the revised bilingual language section created a fair level playing field without causing prejudice.
Ram Nath v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court allowed furlough to a life convict who had previously jumped parole, emphasizing rehabilitation and balancing societal interests under the Delhi Prison Rules, 2018.
Bhanwar Singh Saini v. State (GNCTD) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the magistrate's discretion to refuse police investigation under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. in a family property dispute involving alleged theft, dismissing the petition challenging the refusal.
Krishna Sharma v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the competent authority to treat the writ petition challenging forest land demolition notice as a representation, maintain status quo, and decide the matter after hearing the petitioner within a stipulated time.
M v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Court dismissed the Habeas Corpus petition seeking production of a minor child with the natural guardian, directing parties to resolve custody disputes in the Family Court.
Sh. Satyam Bhadoriya v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed reconsideration of the petitioner's candidature for Sub Inspector post based on a fresh medical report from AIIMS, ensuring fair medical fitness assessment.