Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Khilji Mohsinahmed Mustakali v. Assistant Director
The Bombay High Court upheld the rejection of bail in a money laundering case involving shell companies, holding that the applicant's acts of cheating and forgery tainted the proceeds as 'proceeds of crime' under PMLA.
Principal Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise v. M/S Nexus Alliance Advertising and Marketing Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld that incentives received by an advertising agency from media houses upon achieving revenue targets do not constitute taxable declared services under Section 66E(e) of the Finance Act, 1994.
Ruby Bansal v. C.G.S.T. Delhi East Commissioner & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed a writ petition permitting condonation of delay in filing appeal against retrospective GST registration cancellation, emphasizing the need to consider unintended consequences and granting a hearing on merits.
Asha Rani v. State Bank of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking compassionate appointment under a revised scheme, holding that the scheme applies prospectively and the petitioner’s case did not qualify for retrospective consideration.
Renu Chowdry & Ors. v. Vivek Sharma & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiffs to file additional documents at a late stage in a partition suit challenging a Will, emphasizing the court's discretion to admit relevant evidence to ensure complete adjudication without causing prejudice.
Ashish Kumar Gupta & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR involving commercial transaction offences on the basis of an amicable settlement, exercising its inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS, while imposing costs on the petitioners.
Shuhham Satish Chandra Tripathi v. Vikrant Malik
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act after prima facie finding of an arbitration agreement in a partnership dispute, limiting its inquiry to existence and leaving validity and arbitrability to the tribunal.
MYPREFERRED TRANSFORMATION AND HOSPITALITY PRIVATE LIMITED v. SUBIN JOSEPH
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, limiting its role to a prima facie examination of the arbitration agreement's existence, leaving substantive disputes to arbitration.
CLIX CAPITAL SERVICES PVT LTD v. RADHABEN J ZALA & ANR
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, appointing a sole arbitrator upon prima facie satisfaction of the existence of an arbitration agreement, emphasizing limited judicial scrutiny at this stage.
State v. Nadeem & Anr
The High Court upheld the acquittal under Section 308 IPC, emphasizing the double presumption of innocence and the need for conclusive proof of injuries and intent, and dismissed the State's appeal.
Waman Mahendra Navnath v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a candidate honourably acquitted of criminal charges is entitled to be considered suitable for CISF employment, quashing the rejection based on MHA guidelines that do not apply to acquittals on merits.
M/S UGRO CAPITAL LIMITED & ANR. v. M/S MOBILE PLUS & ORS.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a business loan Facility Agreement containing a valid arbitration clause.
Avik Sanyal v. The State (N.C.T of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court quashed FIR under Section 30 of the Arms Act, 1959, holding that mere possession of a live cartridge without conscious knowledge does not constitute an offence.
Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd v. Bansal Tex Fab Pvt Ltd and Ors
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that the court's role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement without examining arbitrability or merits.
NLB Technology Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Aaga Commercial Services Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act after prima facie finding an arbitration agreement, limiting judicial scrutiny to existence and leaving substantive disputes to arbitration.
Panaesha Education Society v. Sh. Varun Goenka & Ors.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, upon parties' mutual consent, reserving rights including counterclaims, to resolve disputes under a lease agreement.
M/S ONCQUEST LABORATORIES LTD v. MORESTEP PATHLABS PVT. LTD
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that the Court's role is limited to prima facie satisfaction of the existence of an arbitration agreement, leaving all substantive disputes to arbitration.
GLOCAL THINKERS PVT LTD v. INSTRUMENTATION AUTOMATION SURVEILLANCE COMMUNICATION SECTOR SKILL COUNCIL
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, holding that the Court's role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement, leaving substantive disputes to arbitration.
Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Ltd v. Bhoruka Classic Finance Private Limited and Anr
The Delhi High Court held that the arbitration clause in the principal Loan Agreement governs disputes under both the Loan Agreement and the Deed of Guarantee forming a single composite transaction, and appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Bhosale Akash Gajanan v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging disqualification from CISF recruitment due to defective colour vision, upholding medical board findings conducted per prescribed standards.