Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Nilesh Sharma v. Kamal Garg
The High Court allowed the petitioner's application to summon an additional defence witness under Section 311 Cr.P.C. to prove the cheque was issued from a proprietorship account, setting aside the Trial Court's dismissal and imposing costs for delay.
Jaideep Singh Senger v. CBI
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's application for suspension of sentence during appeal, holding that his medical condition did not warrant release and he had not served sufficient portion of his sentence to claim parity with co-accused.
Kamal Kashyap v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi
Delhi High Court upheld conviction under Section 394/34 IPC but reduced the sentence from three years to nine months considering the petitioner’s health and mitigating factors.
Airports Authority of India v. M/S M.S. Khurana Engineering Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award allowing price escalation claims computed from actual site handover date, dismissing AAI's challenge for patent illegality under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.
Ashok Kumar Sah v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted retrospective promotion to a petitioner who was unable to complete mandatory promotional training due to deputation and institutional delays beyond his control.
Sanjay Goel v. BKR Capital Pvt. Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner’s delayed application to cure defects in the written statement under Order VI Rule 15A CPC, setting aside the trial court’s order striking it off, emphasizing justice over procedural technicalities.
Amarjeet Singh Bammi & Anr. v. Master Fatehvir Singh (Minor) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed respondents access to disputed records subject to an undertaking restricting use to the litigation and clarified conditions for further court intervention.
Mukesh v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the State to continue efforts to locate the petitioner’s missing wife and report progress periodically, despite the petitioner’s conviction for rape.
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION v. KAPIL WADHAWAN
The Supreme Court held that filing a complete chargesheet within the statutory period extinguishes the accused's right to default bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C., even if further investigation is pending.
Prakashchandra Joshi v. Kuntal Prakashchandra Joshi
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and granted divorce on the ground of irretrievable breakdown of marriage under its discretionary power under Article 142 of the Constitution of India.
RANI CHANDER KANTA v. UNION OF INDIA
The Supreme Court upheld that ownership of evacuee property is limited to the area specifically sold and paid for, dismissing claims based on possession of a larger area.
OMDEO BALIRAM MUSALE v. PRAKASH RAMCHANDRA MAMIDWAR
The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition against the High Court's refusal to restore a long-delayed suit dismissed for default, emphasizing procedural compliance and the impact of inordinate delay rendering the suit infructuous.
Raja Naykar v. State of Chhattisgarh
The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant due to failure of the prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt on circumstantial evidence, emphasizing the necessity of a complete and conclusive chain of evidence.
Goa Foundation v. State of Goa
The Supreme Court upheld the State of Goa's forest identification criteria for private lands, rejecting the appellant's plea to lower canopy density and area thresholds, and dismissed the appeals challenging these criteria.
District & Sessions Court Employees Welfare Association v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that pay scale parity does not entitle employees to claim re-designation of their posts, as nomenclature is an administrative decision beyond judicial interference.
Prince Ben Nnaka v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a foreign national cannot be detained indefinitely in a deportation centre after completing sentence and being on bail, directing his immediate release and mandating visa consideration in compliance with Article 21.
Kamal Kant and Company LLP v. Raashee Fragrances India Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court restrained the Defendant from using the mark 'RAASHEE' due to its deceptive similarity to the Plaintiff's registered trademark 'RAJSHREE', allowing use only with a distinguishing prefix to avoid confusion.
Yasmin v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court directed continued police investigation and monthly reporting in a Habeas Corpus petition concerning a missing minor registered under Section 363 IPC, without ordering immediate production.
Bairrot Industries v. Ramesh Kumar
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Labour Court's order awarding compensation for illegal termination, holding that the petitioner failed to prove lawful termination or full and final settlement.
Ruslamn Petrov Metodiev v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of a foreign national accused of fake currency offences, holding that non-filing of the FSL report does not entitle default bail and that the gravity of the offence and incriminating evidence justify denial of bail.