Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Arun Naidu @ Anna v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court acquitted appellants in a robbery and stabbing case due to unreliable identification evidence without prior TIP and doubtful recoveries, emphasizing the necessity of proper identification procedures and credible forensic linkage.
Sunil Bihari alias Shakti Singh v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted bail to a murder accused after prolonged pre-trial detention and hostile witnesses, emphasizing timely trial and the right to liberty.
Rajan & Ors. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR involving cheque fraud under Sections 419, 420, 468, 406 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Ashish Kumar & Anr. v. State (Govt. NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Jai Kumar & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC based on an amicable settlement between matrimonial parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Ajay Kumar & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34, 354(A), and 509 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
ZEE ENTERTAINMENT ENTERPRISES LIMITED v. MOHALLA TECH PRIVATE LIMITED
Delhi High Court holds it has territorial jurisdiction over a copyright infringement suit against an online platform despite exclusive jurisdiction clauses in prior agreements.
Babita & Anr. v. Geeta
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the refusal to set aside an ex-parte decree, holding that mere blaming of counsel without sufficient cause and delay justification is inadequate for relief.
Vicky v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The High Court held that non-compliance with Section 195 CrPC bars trial only for offences under Section 186 IPC and does not preclude trial for distinct offences arising from the same facts, dismissing the petition challenging trial for such offences.
The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Sh Vikram Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld a 50% enhancement for future prospects in a motor accident compensation claim involving a permanently employed 26-year-old victim, dismissing the insurer's appeal.
Rahul Gupta @ Ganja v. State of NCT Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a robbery case considering prolonged incarceration, non-identification in TIP, parity with co-accused, and stage of trial despite serious allegations.
United India Insurance Company Ltd v. Badal
The Delhi High Court upheld a motor accident compensation award, rejecting insurer’s plea of contributory negligence and affirming compensation based on claimant’s residence and wages in Delhi.
Tarique R Siddiqui v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to re-approach after disciplinary proceedings conclude, disposing of the petition as withdrawn.
Sgt Ankit Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition and disposed of the case accordingly.
Rohit v. Indian Coast Guard
The Delhi High Court directed a medical examination of the petitioner suffering from hemorrhoids to determine fitness for candidature before considering his application.
State (Through Chief of the Air Staff) v. Mansi Aggarwal
The Delhi High Court directed the Armed Forces Tribunal to decide a long-pending case within six months, respecting the Tribunal's procedural autonomy amid multiple recusals and allowing transfer to Bombay Bench only with the respondent's consent.
Manoj Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the cancellation of the petitioner's appointment due to correction of evaluation errors discovered shortly after recruitment, emphasizing the necessity to maintain merit and fairness.
Major Anish Muralidhar v. Ex Sub Asok M S
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's writ petition, upholding the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension based on established precedents and medical findings.
Fahad Ahmed Siddiqui v. Mahesh Kumar & Anr
Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by reassessing functional disability, applying future prospects, increasing non-pecuniary damages, and remanding for future medical expenses related to prosthetic limb replacement.
Gorakh v. Naresh Kumar
The Delhi High Court modified the motor accident compensation award by applying the Raj Kumar test for loss of earning capacity, granting future prospects to the claimant, enhancing non-pecuniary damages, and remanding recovery rights issues against the driver and owner.