Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Nitin Kedu Rajole v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging cancellation of appointment for failure to prove project affected status and for unexplained delay in filing the petition.
Blessing Amaka Okonko v. State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court rejected bail to the accused in a narcotics case, holding that procedural compliance under the NDPS Act was met and that the presence of commercial quantity narcotics and risk of absconding justified denial of bail.
Stanlee (India) Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. v. The Commissioner of CGST, Delhi North
Refund claims cannot be rejected on grounds of alleged excess Input Tax Credit without issuance of a Show Cause Notice under Sections 73 or 74 of the CGST Act, and withholding refunds without following due process is illegal.
Dhruv Mittal v. Commissioner of Customs
The Delhi High Court directed the Customs Department to comply with its order releasing detained goods without delay, emphasizing that unfiled appeals cannot justify non-compliance and imposing costs for delay.
Brij Lal v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging a land acquisition award on grounds of res judicata, holding that compensation under the 2013 Act is not available after possession was taken post-dismissal of earlier writ petitions.
Dr Neha Parashar v. National Board of Examination and Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the cancellation of a medical trainee's registration for prolonged unauthorized absence, emphasizing strict adherence to Leave Rules and deference to academic authorities in training matters.
Manisha Sharma and Anr v. M/S Olive Exim Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction order under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, affirming the landlord’s title and bona fide requirement, and held that prior permission under the Slum Areas Act was not necessary.
Rajesh Kumar Sen v. Union of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court held that a BSF constable who sustained permanent disability during government duty is entitled to disability pension and ex-gratia compensation under applicable rules and directed prompt payment.
Kuldeep Singh & Ors. v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a noncompoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Sections 498A/406 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.
Mohd Shuaib & Ors. v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute on the ground of amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.
Prabhash Mishra & Anr. v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute on the ground of amicable settlement and exercise of inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.
Union of India & Anr. v. Dr. Dhurjati Majumdar & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's quashing of disciplinary proceedings against a government scientist due to violation of natural justice in ICC inquiry, affirming that ICC reports must be treated as final inquiry reports conducted fairly under Rule 14 CCS (CCA) Rules.
Ritu Bhatia v. The State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 174-A IPC following compounding of the parent Section 138 NI Act offence, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process of court.
Divya Sharma & Anr. v. Shivam Sharma
The Delhi High Court enhanced the interim maintenance awarded to the wife and minor daughter after prima facie assessing the respondent's income as higher than previously determined by the Family Court.
Aryan Bajpai v. State of NCT of Delhi; Om Prakash v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court modified the charge against Aryan Bajpai from murder under Section 302 IPC to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 IPC and discharged co-accused Om Prakash for lack of evidence.
Mohar Singh v. Ram Devi
The Delhi High Court upheld the Sessions Court's order directing the husband to pay maintenance and provide residential relief to his wife, holding that his sale of the shared household without arrangements for her constituted economic abuse under the PWDV Act.
Bhateri Devi v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that the widow of a retired Army and RPF personnel is entitled to dual family pension under 2013 Government Memorandums despite retirement prior to their issuance, quashing the denial as arbitrary and violative of Article 14.
Shri Arun Kumar v. Smt. Sarla & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court’s interim maintenance order granting ₹45,000 per month to the wife and major unmarried daughter, affirming jurisdiction under both Section 125 CrPC and Section 20 HAMA Act to avoid multiplicity of proceedings.
Surendar Kumar v. Bar Council of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging Bar Council of Delhi election arrangements, directing the Special Committee constituted by the Supreme Court to consider the petitioner's representation, reaffirming that election supervision and grievance redressal lie exclusively with the designated Committees.
Union of India v. Shri Hari Prem Malik
The Delhi High Court held that employees who have availed Non-Functional Upgradation are not entitled to the 3rd MACP benefit, but those who have not availed NFU due to higher pay scale postings are entitled to the 3rd MACP.