Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Nagendra Singh v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner’s writ petition directing grant of one notional increment and consequential pension re-fixation in line with binding Supreme Court and High Court precedents applicable to similarly situated persons.
Shubham Malik v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed a fresh independent medical examination to resolve conflicting medical opinions on the petitioner's fitness for service due to alleged Inguinal Hernia.
Apeejay Education Society Regd. & Anr. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi Through Its Commissioner & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal seeking interim stay on construction of a Fixed Compactor Transport Station adjacent to a school, holding compliance with waste management rules and distinguishing prior case law.
Shashank Jain v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging removal from CISF service for negligence in safeguarding a service pistol that was used in a fellow personnel's suicide, holding that the disciplinary authorities acted within their jurisdiction and the penalty was justified.
Lokesh Bansal v. Indian Institute of Science & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging examination results for lack of territorial jurisdiction, directing the petitioner to approach the Karnataka High Court.
Baidyanath Mahto v. Anil Goswami & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that pension granted on benefit of doubt under the Freedom Fighters Pension Scheme is payable from the date of the writ petition, not the original application, and dismissed revival of contempt petitions alleging non-compliance.
Parveen Kumar v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed re-examination of the petitioner’s tattoo removal scar, holding that scars not impairing hand function cannot disqualify a candidate under CAPF medical guidelines.
Mohd Rafi v. State and Anr
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a POCSO and rape case, holding that the prosecution's evidence did not inspire confidence and the presumption under Section 29 POCSO was not satisfied at the bail stage.
Mahender Kumar Khandelwal v. Directorate of Enforcement & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that retention of seized property under PMLA beyond 365 days without complaint against the person or property is unlawful, directing return of seized items to the petitioner.
Komman People Welfare Society (Regd) v. Sukhbir Singh & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to permit filing of replication already submitted and dismissed the appeal challenging condonation of delay after costs were accepted.
Abhay Kumar Jha v. M/S Bosch
The Delhi High Court granted conditional leave to defend in a summary suit upon deposit of principal and security for interest, clarifying principles for leave to defend and pre-suit interest in Order XXXVII proceedings.
Manish Rachhoy v. Kamal Kant Rachhoya
The Delhi High Court reduced the exorbitant fee fixed for a Local Commissioner recording evidence abroad from Rs. 7.5 lakhs to Rs. 2 lakhs, emphasizing reasonableness and prevailing norms.
Uttam Chand Bhatia v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld a Labour Court award granting lump sum compensation instead of reinstatement for illegal termination after a long delay, dismissing the writ petition challenging the award.
M/S MACNEILL ENGINEERING LTD v. SMT. SHARMILA GOEL
The Delhi High Court dismissed the delayed appeal in a commercial lease rent arrears suit, rejecting condonation of delay and upholding the trial court’s decree after finding no denial of opportunity to lead evidence.
M/S EVERSHINE ENTERPRISES v. M/S PK MOTORS
The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of a summary suit on territorial jurisdiction grounds, restored the suit, and granted conditional leave to defend, emphasizing that jurisdictional issues and defence plausibility require trial.
Suresh Shankar Ranade v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking extension of retirement age and pension benefits beyond 55 years for a BSF officer, upholding the Supreme Court’s ruling that the retirement age for Commandant (Selection Grade) is 55 years.
Surinder Singh v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a war-injured BSF officer in Low Medical Category is entitled to exemption from Mandatory Field Service for promotion and directed promotion with effect from the date juniors were promoted.
D BALA MURUGAN v. STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS.
The Court dismissed the Habeas Corpus petition as the alleged detainee, being a major, was not under unlawful confinement and was free to decide her own affairs.
Nishesh Ranjan & Anr. v. Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that despite conflicting arbitration and jurisdiction clauses in multiple agreements, an arbitrator can be appointed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act to resolve disputes, recognizing incorporation of arbitration clauses by reference.
Sanjeev Kumar v. Sub Divisional Magistrate Dwarka and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking mandamus for execution of a recovery certificate, holding that the executing authority had taken appropriate steps and no unjustified delay or mala fide was shown.