Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Rajesh Marwah v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking additional evidence under Section 391 Cr.P.C., holding that the petitioner failed to show sufficient cause for delay and had already extensively cross-examined the complainant in a cheque dishonour case under Section 138 NI Act.
Suraj Mukhi v. The State and Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the police to register FIRs and investigate the disappearance of the petitioner’s husband, ordering monthly status reports to ensure accountability.
Sandeep Jain & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34, and 354 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of the court's process.
B. Sambi Reddy v. CBI
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's dismissal of the petitioner's application under Section 91 Cr.P.C to summon unrelated documents at the prosecution evidence stage, holding that such documents can be summoned only at the defense stage.
Gurpreet Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a commercial quantity NDPS case due to procedural irregularities in sampling, delay in trial, and delay in Section 52A compliance, emphasizing the right to speedy trial under Article 21.
Praveen v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's plea for parole due to major punishments for prison offences violating Delhi Prison Rules, but directed provision of legal aid to file an SLP.
Raman Kumar Mehta v. Govt of NCT through Registrar CGHS & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the authority of a cooperative society's General Body to levy higher maintenance and separate lift charges on tenants, dismissing a tenant's petition for lack of locus standi after he vacated the flat.
National Coop.Con.F.O I.Ltd. v. UOI & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed review of its earlier order and held that the petitioner is entitled to a retrospective concessional customs duty rate of 30% on fresh garlic imports under relevant notifications.
Dr. Senthil Kumar Dharman v. S. Thangalakhsmi
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellate order allowing a fresh domestic violence complaint alleging post-settlement acts, affirming that statutory rights under the DV Act cannot be extinguished by compromise and that multiple jurisdictions exist for filing such complaints.
Anita Jain and Ors. v. Anil Jain and Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to array daughters as parties in a partition suit under Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, setting aside the dismissal based on delay and directing the respondents to prove prior partition by admissible evidence.
Sunita Pandey v. State GNCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the habeas corpus petition seeking production of a missing minor daughter, directing police to file monthly status reports and keep the petitioner informed of investigation progress.
R. Trading Co. Proprietorship of Mr. Rajendra Kumar Bothra through Legal Heir Sh. Mudit Bothra v. Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Services Tax and Another
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration under Section 29(2) requires objective satisfaction and proper notice, and modified the cancellation to take effect from the proprietor's death date.
Hari Ram v. State (NCT) of Delhi
Bail application of accused carrying commercial quantity of ganja was dismissed as the bar under Section 37 of the NDPS Act applied, with quantities from co-accused clubbed for determining commercial quantity.
Okhla Industrial Area CETP Society Regd v. Commissioner of Industries & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a transfer notification issued without communicating the Appropriate Authority's order, emphasizing the mandatory procedural compliance and principles of natural justice under the CETP Act.
Manish Maini v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's order framing additional charges under Section 354 IPC and Section 10 POCSO Act based on prima facie material, but allowed the accused to recall victims for cross-examination on the new charges.
Shri Pitamber and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing ICAR to grant Deputy Secretaries pay parity with CSS employees as mandated by Bye-Laws and Cabinet Note, setting aside the tribunal's rejection.
Kuldeep Kumar v. University of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the University of Delhi's Junior Assistant recruitment process, holding that post facto challenges to the scheme are impermissible and minor errors not affecting results do not vitiate selection.
Ruchi Goyal v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of a sole, non-competitive bid in an e-auction for an industrial plot and dismissed the petition seeking allotment and quashing of the re-auction notice.
Indian Association of Clinical Cardiologists v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition, holding that the Central Government substantively complied with its 2019 directions by independently reconsidering IGNOU's PGDCC recognition application on merits after expert consultation.
Vishal Banga v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that the condition in the Will regarding maintenance of bank guarantees was satisfied upon repayment of liabilities, entitling respondent No. 2 to the NRE fixed deposits and directing issuance of Probate accordingly.