Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
JKG Infratech Private Limited v. Larsen and Toubro Limited
The Delhi High Court held that an entity registered as an MSME after contract execution cannot invoke arbitration under the MSME Act, dismissing the appeal against the arbitrator's order denying jurisdiction.
CRPL Infra Private Limited & Anr. v. Ministry of Food Processing Industries
The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of subsidy claims under PMKSY for expenditure incurred before application, holding that legitimate expectation cannot override clear scheme guidelines and administrative decisions are subject to limited judicial review.
Sanjay Gulati v. Harpreet Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the sentence under Section 138 NI Act, holding that compensation including simple interest was rightly awarded and the sentence need not be enhanced.
Bittoo v. Santosh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the application for condonation of a 955-day delay in filing a civil appeal, holding that the appellant failed to show sufficient cause or bona fide reasons, thereby dismissing the appeal as barred by limitation.
Lt. Col. Balraj Anand (Retd) v. Registrar, Co-operative Societies & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging arbitral proceedings and award under the Delhi Co-operative Societies Act, holding that statutory remedies must be exhausted before invoking writ jurisdiction.
ASUS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. THE GST OFFICER, WARD-91, ZONE-8 DELHI
The Delhi High Court granted ASUS India Private Limited an opportunity to respond to a GST show cause notice lacking signatures and DIN, directing the proper officer to adjudicate after personal hearing.
Guljit Singh Chopra v. M/S French Leather Factory
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against a summary decree for payment where the buyer accepted shipping documents and took delivery of goods but failed to pay, holding that unsubstantiated claims of defective goods and procedural objections were insufficient to avoid liability.
Vishal N.A. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed reconsideration of a pay reduction penalty imposed on a CISF officer for failure to detect a dummy IED, emphasizing the need for parity and non-discrimination in disciplinary punishments under Article 14.
PSK Engineering Construction and Co. v. National Projects Construction Corporation Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that writ jurisdiction is not available for recovery of money under commercial contracts and dismissed the petition challenging payment terms and withholding of dues.
Sharvan Jha v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that an order recording no present need for custodial interrogation does not grant anticipatory bail and set aside the direction requiring prior notice before arrest, affirming the investigating agency's statutory arrest powers.
Brij Bala Kapur v. Directorate of Enforcement Surat Sub Zonal Unit
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a provisional attachment order under the PMLA, emphasizing the availability of efficacious statutory remedies and the need to exhaust them before seeking judicial intervention under Article 226.
Shalini Khanna v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a Lookout Circular issued against a non-accused guarantor, holding that LOCs must be issued only in exceptional cases where departure is detrimental to India's economic interests, and mere loan default does not justify restricting fundamental rights.
Bipin Nagar and Others v. Office of the Principal District and Sessions Judge Headquarter Delhi and Others
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition seeking age relaxation for recruitment, holding that age relaxation is a policy decision beyond judicial interference unless arbitrary or unconstitutional.
Mukesh Kumar & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of the court's process.
Smt. Madhu Papreja v. Anil Kumar Chaddha and Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the partition suit, affirming daughters' equal share under the Hindu Succession Act, rejecting limitation and possession claims, and decreeing partition among all legal heirs.
Union of India v. Late Dr. Nusrat Hameed Khan through Lrs Mrs. Zeenat Hameed Khan & Ors.
Delhi High Court upheld CAT order allowing employees initially appointed on ad hoc basis against pre-2004 vacancies to count their entire service for Old Pension Scheme benefits.
Sumit Khurana & Anr v. Mohd Ibrahim
The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding the landlord's bona fide requirement genuine and denying tenants leave to contest under the limited revisional jurisdiction of Section 25B(8).
Sidheshwar Prasad v. M/S Vian Infrastructure Ltd
The High Court allowed the appellant additional time to produce original documents to substantiate his claim before the Official Liquidator and directed reconsideration of the claim accordingly.
PTA Users Association v. Union of India and Ors.
The High Court directed the Adjudicating Authority to independently reassess the impact of dumped imports on the domestic industry, treating the Appellate Tribunal's observations as prima facie and not binding.
Satendra v. Superintendent Circle -152, Central Goods and Services Tax & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside the retrospective cancellation of GST registration due to lack of particulars and opportunity to the petitioner, emphasizing the need for objective satisfaction and adherence to natural justice under Section 29(2) of the CGST Act.