Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Ajit Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court granted bail to Ajit Singh in a murder conspiracy case, holding that weak prima facie evidence and mere suspicion do not justify denial of bail under Article 21.
Union of India v. Jagdish Rai
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing that the respondent's entire service period, except a specified gap, be counted for pension benefits due to absence of termination and limitation not starting before retirement.
Commissioner CGST Delhi South v. M/S Nitin Industries
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against a refund order under the CGST Act on the ground that the tax effect was below the prescribed threshold and no constitutional or legality challenge was raised.
M/S K.M Food Infrastructure Pvt Ltd v. The Director General DGGI Headquarters, New Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that seizure of currency under Section 67(2) of the CGST Act is impermissible as money is excluded from 'goods', and directed the return of seized cash to the petitioners.
Bahadur Singh v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that a belated Section 11 application challenging a 1958 Bhumidhari Certificate is barred by limitation and res judicata, and only a person in cultivatory possession has locus to maintain such a claim under the Delhi Land Reforms Act.
Axis Bank Ltd v. UV Assets Reconstruction Co
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award awarding ECGC claim monies to the assignee, holding that limited grounds under Section 34 do not permit setting aside the award despite overlapping insolvency proceedings and limitation objections.
Nokia Technologies OY v. Vivo Mobile Communication Co., Ltd
The Delhi High Court recorded a global settlement between Nokia and Vivo resolving all patent infringement and FRAND disputes, leading to dismissal of the suit and connected proceedings.
Nokia Technologies OY v. Guangdong Oppo Mobile Telecommunications Corp., Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court recorded a global settlement between Nokia and Oppo resolving patent infringement disputes and dismissed the suit and counterclaims accordingly.
Nokia Technologies OY v. Vivo Mobile Communication Co Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court recorded a global settlement between Nokia and Vivo in a patent infringement suit, dismissed the suit and counterclaim as withdrawn, and allowed deletion of confidential records.
Nokia Technologies OY v. Guangdong Oppo Mobile Telecommunications Corp. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court recorded a global settlement between Nokia and Oppo in a patent infringement suit involving SEPs, dismissed the suit and counterclaims, and directed refund of pro-tem deposits.
Hem Chand v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the Government to dispose of the petitioner's representation regarding land demarcation within eight weeks, without prejudicing jurisdictional objections.
Devendra Singh Rana v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that withdrawal of a voluntary retirement request by a government servant requires Appointing Authority approval, and rejection of such withdrawal without reasons is not legally impermissible, dismissing the petitioner’s challenge.
Sarita Garg v. Aman Gupta & Ors.
The court held that a suit challenging a registered Will and seeking consequential reliefs like Partition is maintainable if filed within three years of knowledge, and such reliefs can be claimed in the same suit under Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act.
Nicholas Nzube Ukaegbu v. Narcotic Control Bureau
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in an NDPS case due to non-compliance with mandatory sample-drawing procedures under Section 52A, which vitiated the prosecution's primary evidence.
Meena Devi v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the rejection of a freedom fighter's pension claim under the Swatantrata Sainik Samman Pension Scheme, holding that evidentiary requirements were not met and the State Government's recommendation is not binding on the Central Government.
Vipin Saini & Anr. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC in a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement and divorce decree, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of the court's process.
Surender Kumar v. Late Sh. Dhani Ram through LRs and Ors
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and restored the partition suit after holding that rejection of plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC does not attain finality if liberty to file a fresh suit is granted, and that multiple suits for partition are permissible if distinct reliefs are sought.
Tejashwi Prasad Yadav v. Hareshbhai Pranshankar Mehta
The Supreme Court quashed a defamation complaint after the petitioner unconditionally withdrew the offending statements and clarified their context, exercising its powers under Article 142 to do complete justice.
Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation
The Supreme Court directed comprehensive compliance with its earlier orders on bail procedures, police conduct, and support to poor prisoners, incorporating a Standard Operating Procedure to ensure uniform implementation across States and Union Territories.
DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT v. NIRAJ TYAGI & ORS.
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's interim orders staying investigations and restraining coercive action, reaffirming that courts must not stay investigations or grant blanket protection without cogent reasons under Section 482 CrPC.