Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Paras Enterprises v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order under Section 73 CGST Act for failure to provide the petitioner an opportunity of hearing and remanded the matter for re-adjudication.
GAC SHIPPING INDIA PRIVATE LTD. v. THE SALES TAX OFFICER CLASS II DELHI
The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order under Section 73 CGST Act for failure to provide adequate hearing and remitted the matter for re-adjudication with opportunity to the petitioner.
Federal Bank Ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner DGST
The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order under CGST Act for lack of adequate hearing opportunity and remitted the matter for re-adjudication with proper procedural safeguards.
M/S FRIENDS MEDIA ADD COMPANY v. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF GOODS AND SERVICE TAX WEST DELHI
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration requires objective satisfaction and proper notice, setting aside the retrospective cancellation and limiting it to the date of the Show Cause Notice.
KOXAN INDIA v. ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF GST & ANR.
The Delhi High Court held that GST registration can be cancelled retrospectively only on objective grounds with prior notice, and modified the retrospective cancellation order to commence from the last filed return date.
D.C. SALES THROUGH PROPRIETOR DINESH BANSAL v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order under Section 73 of the CGST Act for lack of opportunity to be heard and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication.
M/S Dashmesh Wires and Cables (India) v. Commissioner of GST & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration requires objective satisfaction and reasoned order, and modified the cancellation to operate from the date petitioner ceased business.
M/S. M.K. ENTERPRISES v. M/S. VOHRA RUBBER AND ELECTRICALS & ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that a settlement recorded in a police station does not automatically constitute an admission under Order XII Rule 6 CPC, and dismissed the petition challenging the trial court's refusal to grant a decree on admission in a commercial recovery suit.
Rudal Prajapati v. Jain Samnopasak Sr. Sec. School and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court’s award dismissing the petitioner’s claim of illegal termination, holding that failure to complete 240 days of continuous service precluded protection under Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act.
M/S Envisage v. M/S SAK Buildtech Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the setting aside of an arbitral award where the sole arbitrator was unilaterally appointed without the respondent's consent, affirming that such appointment lacks jurisdiction under the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.
GEE INTERNATIONALS v. DELHI TOURISM AND TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act due to respondent's delay in dispute resolution, directing parties to attempt settlement before arbitration proceeds.
Sh. Tarun Kataria v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a mid-process change in recruitment criteria, holding that a candidate who participates without protest waives the right to later challenge the selection procedure.
Naresh Kumar Mehta v. P.O., Labour Court, The Mgmt of ...
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court’s award dismissing the petitioner for misconduct during inquiry, holding that misbehavior with the enquiry officer constitutes valid grounds for discharge under the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act.
Anil Yadav Security Agency v. Indian Oil Corporation Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging early termination of a security services contract, holding that the termination was lawful under the contract terms and that arbitration was the appropriate remedy.
Castrol Limited v. Rajesh Kumar Tuteja and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the Defendants' deceptive use and bad faith registration of a mark confusingly similar to the Plaintiff's well-known "CASTROL" trademark constituted infringement, granting permanent injunctions, damages, and costs in favor of the Plaintiff.
Praveen Kumar Malhotra v. Arun Kumar
The Delhi High Court held that it can condone delay in filing leave to contest eviction petitions under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act if delay is beyond tenant's control and a substantial case is made, setting aside eviction order and remanding for fresh consideration.
Prashant Nagpal v. Arti Gupta and Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the appeal by consent directing the appellant to vacate the property by a specified date, pay occupation charges, and file an undertaking, thereby terminating all related proceedings.
Priyanka Arora v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi; Kapil Dev Arora v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed bail to appellants accused under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and IPC, holding that the invocation of the Act and denial of bail were unjustified given the civil dispute background and lack of prima facie evidence.
Department of Land Resources v. Mukesh and Associates
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to set aside an arbitral award, holding that procedural irregularities did not invalidate the contract and that interest under the MSMED Act is payable independent of statutory dispute resolution invocation.
Prof. Krishna Mohan Shrimali v. University of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that withholding a university professor’s increment without issuing a show cause notice as mandated by contract and Executive Council resolution was illegal and directed the University to reconsider the increment grant.