Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
InterDigital Technology Corporation & Ors. v. Guangdong Oppo Mobile Telecommunications Corp. Ltd. & Ors.
Delhi High Court directs Defendants to deposit security for patent infringement claims, refuses modification of consent order without consent, and outlines confidentiality club protocols in SEP litigation.
Rajinder Singh Bhatia v. Manju Bhatia
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned order dismissing the interlocutory application, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration due to reliance on unpleaded facts and failure to consider a registered relinquishment deed.
Sohan Lal Gupta v. The Principal DAV Public School and Anr.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition as the school granted admission to the petitioner’s daughter as an EWS student in compliance with the RTE Act and DoE procedures.
BLUSMART FLEET PVT. LTD. v. ENERGY EFFICIENCY SERVICES LTD.
The Delhi High Court appointed an independent arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to resolve a dispute under a Dry Lease agreement, directing arbitration under DIAC rules.
Ram Nath v. State of Uttar Pradesh
The Supreme Court held that the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 overrides IPC Sections 272 and 273 for food adulteration offences committed after its commencement, quashing prosecutions under IPC and mandating exclusive reliance on the FSSA.
William Stephen v. State of Tamil Nadu
The Supreme Court set aside convictions under Section 364A IPC for lack of evidence of threats or ransom demand by the accused, convicting them instead under Section 363 IPC for kidnapping from lawful guardianship.
M. Vijayakumar v. State of Tamil Nadu
The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC, holding that the prosecution failed to prove mens rea and that the High Court erred in shifting the burden of proof under Section 106 of the Evidence Act.
Sudhir Santuji Murkute v. State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court held that a long-serving employee cannot be denied pension and retirement benefits on procedural grounds raised post-retirement, affirming pension as a statutory right protected under Article 21 and legitimate expectation doctrine.
Ashwini Sanjay Kale & Ors. v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that age relaxation under Maharashtra Judicial Service Rules, 2008 applies only to recognized backward classes and not to Economically Weaker Section candidates, dismissing their claim for appointment as judicial officers.
Shri Yogesh Rajendra Mehra v. Principal Commissioner CGST & Central Excise Raigad
The Bombay High Court allowed the writ petition directing refund of tax mistakenly deposited under a cancelled GST registration and held that procedural deficiencies cannot render an appeal barred by limitation if filed online within time.
Salasar Estate Developers LLP v. Rufina Walter Gomes & Ors.
The Bombay High Court set aside injunctions restraining development on ancestral property, holding that long-standing mutation entries and possession by one branch create a strong prima facie title against late challenges by other heirs who suppressed material facts.
Varsha Kapil Doshi v. State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court quashed the recovery of increments paid beyond five years and near retirement, holding such recovery impermissible and emphasizing equitable balance per the Supreme Court’s Rafiq Masih precedent.
Om Impex v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court held that revocation of voluntary GST registration cancellation without prior notice or hearing violates natural justice and quashed the retrospective cancellation orders.
Green Garden Apartments Co-operative Housing Society Limited v. Nitin Chaudhari and others
The Bombay High Court held that sale of TDR by a cooperative housing society was authorized and valid despite internal irregularities and non-registration, dismissing the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction.
Simla Holdings v. The Assistant Commissioner Central Tax Division Rohini, Delhi West
The Delhi High Court held that the limitation for filing an appeal against a tax demand order begins from the date the order is uploaded on the common portal, and dismissed the writ petition for non-maintainability due to availability of an alternative remedy.
MS Babaji Bags A Proprietary Firm v. Union of India Ministry of Finance Department
The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order due to defective communication of hearing notice and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication after affording the petitioner an opportunity of hearing.
Ajay Bajpai v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing allotment of an alternative plot to the petitioner whose land was acquired, holding that ownership of property outside Delhi does not disqualify entitlement under the Government's policy.
Sachin Kumar v. Ravi Ahuja & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the statutory 120-day limit for filing a Written Statement in a civil suit is inviolable and delay beyond this period cannot be condoned, dismissing the appeal against closure of the right to file the Written Statement.
Vibhor Sahai & Ors. v. The State Govt NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual divorce between the parties, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of the court process.
HERO INVESTCORP PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. v. ASHOK KUMAR AND ORS
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to the Plaintiffs against Defendants selling counterfeit 'HERO' motorcycle engine oil, holding that failure to contest the suit amounted to deemed admission of trademark and copyright infringement.