Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Radico Khaitan Limited v. Nargesh Kumar
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, appointing an arbitrator through DIAC to resolve disputes arising from unpaid invoices where the arbitration clause was defective.
Shiv Jatia v. Gian Chand Malick & Ors.
The Supreme Court quashed the criminal complaint against appellants for lack of prima facie offence and improper issuance of summons without requisite police report under Section 202 CrPC in a pre-2006 complaint.
Swami Goverdhan Rangachariji v. M/S. A.J. Printers
The Supreme Court disposed of a landlord-tenant dispute by recording an amicable settlement granting the tenant time to vacate the premises under terms of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1995.
K. BALASUBRAMANI v. THE TAMIL NADU GOVERNMENT
The Supreme Court affirmed ejectment of tenants occupying temple shops beyond lease terms under the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959, while permitting limited occupation extensions subject to arrears payment and agreed conditions.
Hikal Ltd. v. Union of India
The Bombay High Court held that while the writ petition challenging the Principal Bench of NGT's orders is maintainable, it declined to entertain it on forum conveniens grounds, directing the petitioner to seek remedy before the Gujarat High Court.
Hikal Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that while the writ petition challenging the Principal Bench of NGT's orders is maintainable, it declined to entertain it on forum conveniens grounds, directing the petitioner to seek remedy before the Gujarat High Court.
Sunil Ramji Singh v. Central Bureau of Investigation
The Bombay High Court upheld the rejection of discharge for an accused in a bank fraud and corruption case, ruling that a private settlement does not warrant quashing serious economic offence proceedings under Section 482 CrPC.
Kamal J. Sheth v. State of Maharashtra
The High Court quashed the Magistrate's order directing investigation into alleged forgery for non-compliance with mandatory procedural requirements and failure to apply judicial mind.
City Center Mall Private Limited v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court declined to interfere with the electricity assessment order under Section 126 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003, directing the petitioner to pursue the statutory remedy under Section 127.
Anisa Arashad Diwan v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court allowed a writ petition quashing cancellation of an OBC candidate's engineering admission due to delay in submitting caste validity certificate, holding the delay was not attributable to her and the college's conduct implied waiver.
HBL Power Systems Limited v. Ultra Mega Power Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging an arbitral award on warranty claims for defective batteries, affirming limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
State v. Jai Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a sexual assault case due to material contradictions, unexplained delay, and lack of corroboration, emphasizing the prosecution's burden to prove foundational facts beyond reasonable doubt.
Surender Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed a habeas corpus petition filed by a father seeking custody of his adult married daughter, affirming her right to personal liberty and choice.
Th. Genlianmang v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the Departmental Promotion Committee lawfully considered the petitioner's penalty in denying promotion, dismissing the writ petition challenging the rejection order.
Shaviya Sharma v. Squint Neon & Ors.
The Delhi High Court recognized the harms of Doxing and directed removal of objectionable tweets and disclosure of subscriber information to protect the Plaintiff's privacy and enable legal recourse despite absence of specific statutory provisions.
Kunwarpal v. State Through SHO, P.S. Special Cell
Charges against the petitioner under the NDPS Act were quashed due to lack of grave suspicion, as mere CDR connectivity and inadmissible co-accused statements were insufficient to frame charges.
Narender Singh v. Prachi Jain
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's order directing the Husband to pay Rs. 1,00,000 per month interim maintenance to the Wife, rejecting his claim of lower income and concealment of assets.
Ayan Ansari v. State (GNCT of Delhi) and Anr
The Delhi High Court held that custody of a minor sexual assault victim in Habeas Corpus proceedings must prioritize the child's welfare and directed the Child Welfare Committee to consider the petitioner's custody application accordingly.
Raj Kumar Kukreja v. Principal Commissioner Delhi Goods and Service Tax and Anr
The Delhi High Court set aside the retrospective cancellation of GST registration due to lack of reasons and opportunity to be heard, emphasizing objective satisfaction and procedural fairness under Section 29(2) of the CGST Act.
Rupinder Singh Bedi & Ors. v. Department of Forest and Wildlife & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed fresh demarcation with petitioners' participation before any demolition on disputed forest land, emphasizing protection of property rights and use of scientific methods.