Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Nita Puri v. Punjab National Bank
The Delhi High Court quashed Punjab National Bank's order declaring the petitioner a Wilful Defaulter, holding that such classification requires independent objective findings beyond forensic audit reports.
Ratul Puri v. Bank of Baroda
The Delhi High Court set aside the declaration of Ratul Puri as a Wilful Defaulter by Bank of Baroda, holding that the bank failed to independently establish intentional diversion of funds and did not comply with procedural safeguards under the RBI Master Circular.
Ratul Puri v. Punjab National Bank
The Delhi High Court set aside the declaration of Ratul Puri as a Wilful Defaulter by Punjab National Bank, holding that the bank failed to independently establish wilful default as required under the RBI Master Circular.
Nomil Rana v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld termination of a CISF probationer for suppressing a pending criminal case in his attestation form, affirming that such concealment justifies dismissal without inquiry.
Partha Mandal v. Special Commissioner of Police Vigilance
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking mandamus to compel departmental enquiry against a police officer, holding no cognizable offence was made out and no enquiry was pending.
Narinder Pal Verma v. Kamal Thapar
The High Court upheld the trial court’s order closing prosecution evidence after repeated adjournments and dismissed the petition seeking recall of the complainant for cross-examination under Section 311 Cr.P.C., finding no sufficient cause to interfere under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Hogar Controls India Pvt. Ltd. v. Anadasu Vijay Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the Plaintiff owns the trademarks “HOGAR” and “HOGAR CONTROLS” under the Shareholders and Subscription Agreement and restrained Defendants from using the marks, ruling that Defendants’ claims of ownership were unfounded.
Adarsh Enclave Residents Welfare Association v. Government of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court protected residents from demolition of their properties by the Forest Department where no prior notice was issued and the land was not forest land, directing administrative consideration of their claims.
Abhay Sapru & Anr. v. State Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging FIR No. 082/2023 as an abuse of process, holding that parties cannot file multiple petitions with conflicting grounds to circumvent court orders.
Rushikesh Balshiram Borhade v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that judicial interference with expert medical board findings on fitness for CAPF training is minimal and dismissed the petition challenging the medical boards' declaration of unfitness.
Devki Devi v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court protected the petitioner’s property from demolition by the Forest Department, holding that demolition notices against non-forest land without proper demarcation and prior notice are unlawful.
Chanchali Gowrinaidu v. Indian Coast Guard
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging rejection of candidature in Indian Coast Guard recruitment due to late submission of category certificate and held that mandatory conditions in recruitment advertisements must be strictly complied with.
Mohammad Hakim and Anr v. Delhi Development Authority
Delhi High Court set aside DDA's rejection of rehabilitation claims of first-floor Kathputli Colony dwellers lacking separate ration cards, directing allotment based on evidence of independent occupation and policy interpretation.
Geeta Ojha v. State (Govt.) NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The High Court quashed the criminal complaint under Section 138 NI Act against a petitioner who was not issued a statutory legal notice and was not a signatory to the cheque, holding that prosecution without these conditions is impermissible.
Dharamveer Singh v. Vidya Shree Devi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking leave to appeal against acquittal in a cheque dishonour case, holding that the respondent successfully rebutted the statutory presumption under Section 139 NI Act with consistent evidence and expert opinion.
Arti Arora v. Sh Diwakar Singh
The Delhi High Court modified a divorce decree granted on cruelty and desertion to one by mutual consent and expunged adverse observations following a settlement between the parties.
Baby Yadvi v. Vishal Bharti Public School & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a school must admit an EWS student shortlisted by the Directorate of Education through the computerized draw of lots if no representation against the seat matrix is filed within the prescribed period.
Keystone Solutions v. K7 Group Hospitality Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that a valid arbitration agreement existed and the petition was timely and unopposed.
Union of India & Ors. v. Shardadevi Widow of Late T Ashok Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal’s grant of disability pension to a retired air force personnel with composite lifelong disability, affirming the limited scope of certiorari jurisdiction in reviewing tribunal factual findings.
Union of India v. Ex NC E Chhatar Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension to an ex-serviceman, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are attributable to military service unless rebutted by the employer, and limiting its review to errors of law under certiorari jurisdiction.