Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Milind Patel v. Union Bank of India
The Bombay High Court held that banks must provide all relevant material and pass reasoned orders in wilful defaulter proceedings under the RBI Master Circular, ensuring adherence to natural justice and transparency.
Union of India v. S. M. Padwal; Yashwant Balu Lotale v. Union of India
The Bombay High Court held that confessional statements made during criminal investigation are inadmissible in departmental proceedings against employees not tried as co-accused, and disciplinary findings based solely on such statements lack evidentiary basis warranting judicial interference.
Neena Uppal v. The Union of India
The Bombay High Court directed provisional release of imported betelnuts after holding that the Customs authorities cannot deny clearance contrary to an advance ruling and FSSAI certification absent conclusive evidence of impurity.
West India Continental Oils Fats Pvt. Ltd. v. The Union of India
The Bombay High Court held that interest is payable on IGST refunded which was collected under unconstitutional notifications, overruling the respondents' rejection based on CGST Act provisions.
Shri Tarun Chander Malik v. M/S Varahi Diamonds and Finance Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that conflicting court jurisdiction and arbitration clauses in a lease deed must be harmoniously construed to uphold arbitration and appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Rishabh Kumar Gupta @Reshu & Ors. v. State Through SHO P.S. New Ashok Nagar & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A/323/34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce.
Raman Batra & Ors. v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR and criminal proceedings arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce.
TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. v. SMT. PREETI WIFE OF DECEASED & ORS.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal challenging the involvement of the offending vehicle in a fatal motor accident, upholding the Tribunal's award based on credible eyewitness and investigation evidence.
Godavari Projects (J.V) v. Union of India
Delhi High Court held that a contractual proviso delaying arbitration until alternative arrangements are made does not bar arbitration and appointed an independent arbitrator despite insolvency proceedings against a joint venture member.
Parul Gaur v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court declined to interfere via Habeas Corpus in a custody dispute pending before the Mahila Court, directing the petitioner to seek telephonic contact with her children through the Ministry of External Affairs.
CCS Computers Private Limited v. New Delhi Municipal Council & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a blacklisting order for lack of reasoned decision and violation of natural justice, directing fresh proceedings with proper notice and opportunity to respond.
Riteesh Mohan Bakshi & Anr v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors
The Delhi High Court granted interim protection to petitioners against a forest department notice alleging encroachment, directing due process and consideration of ownership claims before coercive action.
M/S PRACHI INFRA AND ROADS PVT. LTD. v. M/S KANTI PRASHAD MITTAL & ORS
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging a direction for CBI enquiry into unauthorized subcontracting under a government infrastructure contract, emphasizing that disputed factual issues require investigation and parties cannot rely on project experience pending enquiry.
SWISS BIKE VERTRIEBS GMBH SUBSIDIARY OF ACCELL GROUP v. RELIANCE BRANDS LIMITED
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction restraining defendant's use of the mark 'RALLEYZ' for bicycles, holding it deceptively similar to plaintiff's registered trademark 'RALEIGH' under Section 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
AMAR ENTERPRISES v. COMMISSIONER OF DELHI GOODS AND SERVICES TAX AND ANR
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration requires objective satisfaction and prior notice, and modified the cancellation to take effect from the Show Cause Notice date instead of an earlier retrospective date.
S SRI RADHA KRISHNA INTERNATIONAL v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order under Section 73 CGST Act for failing to consider the taxpayer's detailed reply and remanded the matter for re-adjudication with an opportunity to be heard.
M/S SALASAR TRADING COMPANY v. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF GOODS AND SERVICE TAX NORTH DELHI
The Delhi High Court set aside a retrospective GST registration cancellation order for lack of reasons and procedural fairness, emphasizing objective satisfaction and notice requirements under Section 29(2) of the CGST Act.
ZOMLIM INDIA TRADE INDIA PVT LTD v. DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE NEW DELHI & ANR.
The Delhi High Court directed the Customs authority to expeditiously consider the petitioner's request for release or provisional release of seized goods under Section 110 of the Customs Act, 1962, without deciding on the merits.
Jagat Singh & Ors. v. NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioners' challenge under Article 227 against the Trial Court's order directing fresh demarcation of disputed property at petitioners' cost, affirming the limited scope of supervisory jurisdiction.
Chandra Kanta Agarwala v. Ajay Gaur & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's refusal to summon records from a separate suit for handwriting verification, directing the petitioner to seek such relief before the competent civil court, affirming the limited scope of supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227.