Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Union of India v. M/S PNSC Infrastructure Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's appeal against the dismissal of a delayed Section 34 petition challenging an arbitral award, holding that the limitation period restarts upon return of the petition and delay cannot be condoned without sufficient cause.
Union of India v. M/S. Tech Mahindra Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award, holding that the award did not suffer from patent illegality and the arbitrator's contract interpretation and factual findings were justified.
MUFG Bank Ltd v. Commissioner of Income Tax 2 & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, an assessee can settle individual appeals independently without settling all appeals for the same assessment year.
MUFG BANK LTD v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2 & ANR
The Delhi High Court held that under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, a taxpayer can settle one or more disputes arising from an assessment year without settling all pending appeals or petitions.
Nandini Rai v. The State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of FIR alleging harassment and impersonation on Instagram, holding that the FIR discloses cognizable offences and investigation must be allowed to continue.
Sangeeta Beri v. Chander Kant Beri
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's dismissal of the petitioner's application for judgment on admission, holding that the respondent's defenses raised factual disputes requiring trial.
LARSEN AND TOUBARO LIMITED AND PASSAVANT ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT GMBH JV v. COMMISSIONER OF DELHI GOODS AND SERVICE TAX AND ANOTHER
The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order under Section 73 CGST for failing to consider the taxpayer's detailed reply and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication with opportunity of hearing.
Rajesh Kumar Sehrawat v. Laxmi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's appeal against eviction after lease expiry and rent default, upholding the eviction decree and denying further indulgence.
Upakarma Ayurveda Private Limited v. Rasayanum Enterprises
The Delhi High Court upheld the plaintiff's injunction against the defendant's deceptively similar trade dress for 'PURE SHILAJIT' products, allowing the defendant a limited period to adopt distinctive packaging for one product variant.
Pidilite Industries Ltd. v. Sanjay Jain & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking removal of the respondent's trademark 'POMA-EX KIWKHEAL', holding that the petitioner has no exclusive rights over the word 'KWIK' and the marks are not deceptively similar.
K.C.P INDIA v. THE COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND TAXES & ANR.
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration under Section 29(2) CGST Act requires objective reasons and opportunity to the taxpayer, and modified the cancellation date to the petitioner's application date.
Union of India v. Dr Suchita Ninawe
The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition challenging its earlier judgment upholding the Department of Expenditure's recovery order and clarified that review is not permissible without an error apparent on record or fresh grounds not raised earlier.
Pawan Kumar v. Sashastra Seema Bal
The Delhi High Court held that a candidate’s eligibility based on a clean service record must be assessed as on the date of certificate issuance and remanded the matter to determine if disciplinary proceedings were pending or contemplated at that time before rejecting candidature.
Sankara Subbu v. Registrar of Cooperative Societies and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition by a non-member resident seeking adjudication of disputes and an online grievance redressal mechanism, holding that only society members have statutory rights before the Registrar and courts cannot direct creation of new grievance mechanisms.
Amit Kumar v. State (Govt. of NCR of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 308 IPC based on an amicable settlement between step-brothers, emphasizing the court's inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Vikram Chahar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed a fresh medical examination for a CRPF sports quota candidate declared unfit due to overweight, emphasizing limited judicial interference but ensuring fairness and adherence to natural justice.
Central Bureau of Investigation v. A Raja & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted leave to appeal against the acquittal of accused in the telecom license allotment case, emphasizing that leave is warranted only if the trial court's acquittal is perverse or based on misappreciation of evidence.
Pawan Gupta & Anr. v. Kamal Gupta & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitrability of disputes arising from a family settlement deed, appointed a sole arbitrator, and dismissed intervention applications by non-signatories, emphasizing the special equity in family arrangements and the independence of arbitration clauses.
M/S L.R. BUILDERS PVT. LTD. & ORS v. M/S P.P. JEWELLERS PVT. LTD. & ORS
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiffs' application for interim injunction, holding that family settlement deeds among shareholders do not by themselves affect company property rights and emphasizing the courts' liberal approach to upholding bona fide family arrangements.
Greenfield Residents Welfare Society v. Sunny Khandelwal & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a contempt petition against respondents for derogatory WhatsApp messages, considering their apology and partial resolution of related appeals.