Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Sharad Devidas Shelke v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court upheld the disqualification of a candidate for incorrectly stating his educational qualification in the recruitment application, emphasizing the candidate's responsibility for accuracy and refusing to disturb the completed selection process.
The New India Assurance Co Ltd v. Promila Prabhakar
The Delhi High Court upheld compensation based on UK minimum wages for a British national deceased in a motor accident, holding the registered owner and insurer jointly liable despite unregistered vehicle transfer and rejected insurer's plea of non-liability due to permit and policy transfer issues.
Shiv Raj Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the discharge of accused in a criminal case involving alleged forged transfer of company shares, holding that the trial court must consider the chargesheet and investigation material rather than relying solely on NCLT orders at the charge framing stage.
Guriqbal Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that upgraded below benchmark ACRs must be considered retrospectively for promotion and seniority restoration, quashing the denial based on a DoP&T OM applicable only prospectively.
Aney Pal Singh v. Ashok Kumar Kholi
The Delhi High Court set aside dismissal of eviction petitions under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding that lease expiry alone does not bar eviction if no dispossession steps were taken, and remanded for fresh adjudication.
Chanpreet Singh Bammi v. Sukhmani Kaur Oberoi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition against the respondent for non-compliance with a family court order that was subsequently modified and no longer subsisted, holding that contempt requires willful disobedience of a subsisting order.
Haldiram India Pvt. Ltd. v. Berachah Sales Corporation & Ors.
The Delhi High Court declared 'HALDIRAM' a well-known trademark, granted permanent injunction against defendants' infringing use, and awarded damages for trademark infringement and passing off.
Yogesh Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted bail and suspended sentence of a convicted appellant in a POCSO case pending appeal, citing material contradictions, unexplained FIR delay, and incomplete investigation without expressing final opinion on merits.
Gupta v. Ekta Kapur
The Delhi High Court allowed the husband's appeal granting divorce on the ground of mental and physical cruelty by the wife under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, setting aside the Family Court's dismissal.
Suman Kumar Bhan v. Durga Bhan Nee Haifz
The Delhi High Court dismissed the husband's appeal seeking divorce on grounds of cruelty and desertion, holding that he failed to prove the respondent wife's cruelty or desertion, and that his own conduct amounted to cruelty compelling her to leave.
State v. Virender @ Billu & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal and upheld the acquittal of accused for gang rape under Section 376G IPC due to unreliable prosecutrix testimony and insufficient corroborative evidence.
State v. Afroz @ Sharib & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of accused in an acid attack case due to contradictions and investigative deficiencies but directed victim compensation and rehabilitation.
Anupam Trivedi v. Ram Singh Rathwa and Another
The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition for non-compliance with an order that did not expressly permit the petitioner to continue in TRIFED, holding that the Chairman lacked authority to override the Ministry’s repatriation order.
Sunil Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of a jail superintendent accused of facilitating an organized crime syndicate operating from inside Rohini Jail, holding that the stringent conditions under Section 21(4) of MCOCA were not met.
Maple ODC Movers Private Limited v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court set aside a GST demand order passed without proper notice and hearing, directing re-adjudication after affording the petitioner an opportunity to respond.
M/S A. B TRADERS v. COMMISSIONER OF DELHI GOODS AND SERVICE TAX & ANR.
The Delhi High Court set aside a cryptic GST demand order for failing to consider the taxpayer's detailed reply and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication with proper examination and hearing.
Canara Bank v. Assistant Commissioner, DGST
The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order under Section 73 CGST for failure to consider the taxpayer's detailed reply and remitted the matter for re-adjudication with opportunity for hearing.
KAILASH INTERNATIONAL v. COMMISSIONER OF DELHI GOODS AND SERVICE TAX & ANR.
The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order for failure to consider the taxpayer's detailed reply and remanded the matter for re-adjudication after affording opportunity of personal hearing.
Bona Vita Technologies Pvt. Ltd. v. The Sales Tax Officer Class-II Avato Ward 94 Zone 8 New Delhi 110002
The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order under Section 73 CGST Act for non-consideration of the taxpayer's detailed reply and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication with opportunity to be heard.
Manpowergroup Services India Pvt Ltd v. The Sales Tax Officer Class-II Ward-I Zone-I Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the petitioner to respond to show cause notices alleging irregular input tax credit with procedural safeguards, without adjudicating merits.