Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Ravinder Kumar v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's application for condonation of a 1277-day delay in filing a restoration application, holding that no sufficient cause was shown to justify the delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
Sh. Manish Soni and Ors. v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 506 and 509 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Lokesh Sharma @ Sonu v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted pre-arrest bail to the applicant, holding he is not a relative of the deceased's husband and thus not liable under Sections 498A and 304B IPC, with custodial interrogation deemed unnecessary.
Dhruv @ Laddu v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to young accused in a grievous injury case, emphasizing the need to balance the gravity of offence with prolonged pre-trial detention and imposing conditions to safeguard trial integrity.
Mahboob Khan v. State Through SHO Chhawla
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the applicant accused of aiding kidnapping and sexual offences, emphasizing parity with co-accused bail and absence of risk to witnesses or trial.
I S v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 376 IPC after the parties solemnized marriage during investigation, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process.
M/S Jai Durga Industries v. Phool Chand Bhagat Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking reopening of cross-examination in a Section 138 NI Act complaint, holding that repeated adjournments and delay justified closure of cross-examination to uphold the summary nature of proceedings.
Manish Soni and Ors. v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of the Court's process.
Birender @ Beeru@Veerpal & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of the Court's process.
Alok Jolly and Others v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process.
Alok Singhal v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354, 354B, 506, 509, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process.
Babul Hussen v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to a 19-year-old accused in a POCSO case after prima facie evaluation of evidence and considering the rebuttable presumption of guilt under Section 29 of the POCSO Act.
Udit Thapar & Ors. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of the court's process.
Iliyas Khan v. Narcotics Control Bureau
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in an NDPS case, holding that uncorroborated disclosure statements of co-accused cannot alone deny bail and the embargo under Section 37 NDPS Act does not apply where reasonable grounds exist to believe the accused is not guilty.
Rakesh Mohan Agarwal v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging initiation of disciplinary proceedings against the CMD of ITI Ltd., holding such challenge premature and affirming applicability of CDA Rules mutatis mutandis to the petitioner.
Gopal Singh v. The State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 308/323/506/34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process.
Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation v. Punit Kumar @ Ashish and Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal’s order allowing amendment of the claim petition to correct the vehicle registration number, dismissing UPSRTC’s petition challenging the same.
VRC Constructions India Pvt Ltd v. National Highways Authority of India
The Delhi High Court directed the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation against the annulment of the tender and pass a reasoned order, without adjudicating on the merits.
Gautam Kumar Das v. NCT of Delhi through the Commissioner of Police & Ors.
The Delhi High Court emphasized the child's welfare in a custody dispute, directing mediation and interim visitation while leaving final custody determination to the Family Court.
M/S SHARUN WIRES PVT LTD v. M/S M & A ORIENT ACCESSORIES PVT LTD
The Court held that a sale of mortgaged property by a company in liquidation without court leave is prima facie void but may be validated if bona fide, while recognizing the secured creditor’s right under SARFAESI Act to enforce security by private sale.