Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Balbir Singh v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that allotment of Tehbazari sites must be considered under the statutory vending plan framework and directed the petitioner’s representation to be considered by the Town Vending Committee once constituted.
Jawaid Tauhidi v. DTC
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's decision denying retrospective promotion to a petitioner due to adverse confidential reports and affirmed that seniority-cum-fitness requires consideration of such reports for promotion.
Nikhat Parveen @ Khusboo Khatun v. Rafique @ Sillu
The High Court held that allowing a witness to tender documents after examination-in-chief but before cross-examination under Section 311 Cr.P.C. does not violate Section 362 Cr.P.C. and dismissed the petition challenging the same.
GE Strategic Investments India (Pvt. Company with Unlimited Liability) v. Official Liquidator
The Delhi High Court allowed the Official Liquidator's petition and ordered the final dissolution of GE Strategic Investments India following compliance with statutory requirements under the Companies Act, 1956.
National Board of Examination in Medical Sciences v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside GST refund rejection orders for lack of personal hearing and improper reliance on an administrative circular, remanding the matter for fresh consideration in accordance with law.
National Board of Examination in Medical Sciences v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner, as an educational institution conducting examinations and structured courses, is entitled to retrospective GST exemption under the 2017 Notification, while screening and accreditation services remain taxable.
National Board of Examination in Medical Sciences v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside GST refund rejection orders for lack of personal hearing and procedural fairness, remanding the matter for fresh consideration in line with statutory provisions.
M/S Rahul Packaging v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a Show Cause Notice issued by an incompetent officer under the CGST Act vitiates the proceedings, and the appellate authority cannot decide the matter on merits but must remit it to the competent authority.
Smt Shail Kumari v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a judgment in rem mandating pension revision must be implemented for all similarly situated employees and their heirs, rejecting delay and record non-availability defenses, and directed payment of arrears with interest to the petitioner.
Rajesh Kumar Ravi v. P.O., Delhi School Tribunal & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed the dismissal of a school employee for violation of mandatory procedural rules and principles of natural justice, ordering reinstatement with consequential benefits.
Rajni Anand v. Cosmic Structures Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that a shareholding transfer and payments made prior to winding up petition in the ordinary course of business are valid, directing the Official Liquidator to de-seal and hand over possession of the property to the petitioner.
Rajinder Singh & Anr v. Union of India & Ors
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 2013 Act do not lapse if compensation is deposited, even if physical possession is not taken due to a stay order.
National Board of Examination in Medical Sciences v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside GST refund rejection orders for lack of supporting assessment and violation of natural justice, remanding the matter for fresh consideration.
Malsh Charitable Trust v. Lieutenant Governor, Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed a writ petition restraining coercive action by the Forest Department and directed adjudication of land demarcation disputes by the Deputy Commissioner under Section 28 of the Delhi Land Revenue Act, protecting possessory rights pending resolution.
M/S NBCC (INDIA) LIMITED v. M/S NANGIA CONSTRUCTION (I) PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award holding that the mobilization advance is a repayable loan despite wrongful termination, rejecting the subcontractor's claim for refund and limiting interest payable to the period after repayment to the Principal Employer.
Kunal Kumar v. Govt of NCT Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition of an animal shelter operator holding unauthorized occupation of government-acquired land, affirming the State's right to evict encroachers without violating legal principles.
Mukesh Kumar Jha and Ors. v. Manohar Parrikar Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses
The Delhi High Court analyzed whether MP-IDSA qualifies as 'State' under Article 12, applying tests of pervasive government control and function, to determine maintainability of writ petitions seeking service regularization.
SH SUNNY SACHDEVA v. ACP NORTH RTI CELL AND ANR
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the CIC order, holding that acceptance of amended RTI replies and initiation of departmental action preclude further judicial interference at this stage.
Vijay Yadav & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that in absence of notified Recruitment Rules, no promotion or retrospective promotion to upgraded BSF legal posts can be granted, dismissing the petitioners' claims despite administrative delays.
Sunshine Capital Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax - Circle-9(1), Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the limitation period for passing fresh assessment under Section 153(3) of the Income Tax Act begins when the Department becomes aware of the ITAT order, not strictly on formal receipt, and directed the Department to comply with the ITAT order including refund and release of attached properties.